Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Government Obesity & Bike Scheme

Anyone who actually manages to get one of these £50 repair vouchers is going to be very disappointed when they rock up at the bike shop with it to be told 'sorry, we're booked solid for the next six weeks and we can't get half of the parts you need to repair your 15 year old 26" mountain bike because all the suppliers are out of stock'.

This is true. My local bike shop had a months wait before the repair vouchers started. I expect it will be worse now.
He genuinely cycles a lot already. He used to cycle past my place of work on his way home from city hall. Always gave him an earful.

He used to. He's not allowed to cycle since becoming PM.
 
My workplace is about 12 miles from my home, according to Google Maps. Fuck cycling that distance twice a day every weekday, in British weather. Especially if I can't use a decent-sized electric motor to help me up the foothills of the Chilterns. Is the government going to help me with funding (I don't have a bike) and getting the appropriate licence? Are they FUCK!

As for the idea of getting rid of bus stops, I think we should instead get rid of the people who come up with such absolutely fucking stupid ideas. It would be better than putting people with mobility issues into bother!
 
Going by the media, the focus of this anti-obesity thing seems to be bikes. Which I find kind of strange. I mean exercise is all well and good but is diet not more important in terms of cutting obesity? And why choose a form of exercise that requires equipment (ie a bike) and that many people will never do because they don't feel safe cycling? (And yes, people should feel safe cycling and yes, increase the number of cycle lanes etc but that takes quite a lot of time to implement.)

Why not encourage people to walk more, given it's free, doesn't require any equipment and is something many people will safer doing than cycling? If you want to encourage people, what about giving out free (cheap) pedometers and introducing a 'walk x steps a week and get rewarded with something' instead? (Okay off the top of my head but you know...)

It's what the media are running as it's just a hook that works for them atm, the idea is that they'll be a whole package of things. And yeah exercise is a rubbish way to lose weight, it's diet really that's the key. But that's a really complex problem to sort out, even more so than smoking, not holding out much hope!
 
Last edited:
But is the bike thing for obesity reduction or for pollution reduction? :confused:

Those obese people are going to expel a massive amount of CO2 becoming non-obese again.
They are basically walking carbon stores.

I think a total re-think is required. :(
 
The £50 voucher is a good start but it really needs to be expanded. If Birmingham city council could give away a bunch of bikes a few years ago, why can't the government? I'm sure there's some scope for giving the tender to one of their mates whereby a £300 bike costs the government £500. Everyone's happy then, surely?
 
I need new handle bar tape and possibly a mini service. :hmm:

I looked on the website last night and it was very vague as to what you were allowed to do. weepiper have you been given any guidance as to what is allowable?

e2a: missed this will be back in a few minutes as there is guidance I will get for you

from the information for shops
The repairs must be necessary to make cycles roadworthy and fit for purpose, this may include:
  • Repair or replace tyres, tubes, wheels and related components
  • Adjust, repair or replace braking system components
  • Adjust, repair or replace transmission system components.
  • Repair or replace other essential components which prevent safe use of the cycle e.g. deteriorated grips or saddle
  • Repair or replacement of components for permanently fitted lighting systems
Repairs which are NOT eligible:
  • replacement or upgrade of existing safe and roadworthy components
  • replacement or repair of removeable lighting accessories
https://fixyourbikevoucherscheme.es...ke Voucher Scheme - Shop Information Pack.pdf

page 12



The one I go to is run by a working class guy, Mo, who’s had the shop for years. Two of the lads who work there are ex builders who got onto the bikes after the 2008 crash. He also employs three young lads giving them apprenticeships. Multi racial, working class. Dead friendly, really helpful.

Top class:

View attachment 224132

BPR are great, my second choice of cycle shop - I got to Birmingham Bike Foundry in Stirchley usually, partly because I know some of the people who run it and partly because it's a co-op but it's great having two excellent bike repair places on my doorstep.

Going by the media, the focus of this anti-obesity thing seems to be bikes. Which I find kind of strange. I mean exercise is all well and good but is diet not more important in terms of cutting obesity? And why choose a form of exercise that requires equipment (ie a bike) and that many people will never do because they don't feel safe cycling? (And yes, people should feel safe cycling and yes, increase the number of cycle lanes etc but that takes quite a lot of time to implement.)

Why not encourage people to walk more, given it's free, doesn't require any equipment and is something many people will safer doing than cycling? If you want to encourage people, what about giving out free (cheap) pedometers and introducing a 'walk x steps a week and get rewarded with something' instead? (Okay off the top of my head but you know...)

I've been listening to radio news today (or yesterday maybe it was) and the focus of that has been on the advertising rule changes, really not much about cycling when talking about the obesity thing, although there's been lots of other cycling things like the repair voucher scheme and the plans for new cycling infrastructure.
Thing about bikes is you're killing three birds with one stone - physical activity, rush hour congestion and air pollution/climate change. Walking is also being promoted through the cycling & walking schemes paid for through new infrastructure which will also hopefully address the safety issue. There's been new guidance released by the highways agency which I haven't had the chance to look at myself but I'm reliably informed is looking really good (as long as it's acted on anyway) so fingers crossed.

Where I live is one of the places in Birmingham that has been mentioned earlier in the thread as getting a filtered neighbourhood treatment which is going to include a short pedestrianised section on one of the side streets off the high street (sadly kings heath high street itself is a major A road and there's no real opportunity for a bypass for all the through traffic as it'd be great if that would be pedestrianised as well, but they are taking out on street parking to widen the pavements (has already happened because of covid-19) as well as putting in the filters to prevent rat running down the residential side roads off the high street. It should all help encourage people to walk rather than drive to the high street, as well as improving things for cyclists.

My workplace is about 12 miles from my home, according to Google Maps. Fuck cycling that distance twice a day every weekday, in British weather. Especially if I can't use a decent-sized electric motor to help me up the foothills of the Chilterns. Is the government going to help me with funding (I don't have a bike) and getting the appropriate licence? Are they FUCK!

As for the idea of getting rid of bus stops, I think we should instead get rid of the people who come up with such absolutely fucking stupid ideas. It would be better than putting people with mobility issues into bother!

The cycle to work scheme has some major flaws but if you don't get caught by them it's really brilliant scheme from the govt. Your employer buys the bike, claims back the VAT and doesn't charge it on to you, so you immediately save ~20%. You pay for it over 12 months, interest free, taken from your pay packet before tax, so you don't pay income tax/NI on it either, which reduces the price further by a % that depends on your tax bracket. There's a bigger payment at the end but I can't remember the details of how that works. It can save you a lot of money on a bike and you pay for it over a year. You can also use it to buy accessories like lights, helmet etc.

The problems are that it's a maximum £1,000 which is entry level for an ebike afaik. There has been talk of raising that limit but I don't think it's happened. Other problem is that employers cannot, by law, make deductions from your pay that would take you below minimum wage. This is simply not allowed for any reason, so someone in a minimum wage job can't use the cycle to work scheme, even though they are the people who will benefit most :( If you're close to minimum wage you might not be able to spend the full £1,000.
You also can't use it for second hand bikes, which is especially bad right now since I understand that new bikes under £500 are hard to come by.

You also don't need a licence for a bike or e-bike but most councils offer cheap or free adult cycling training which would be recommended.
 
Last edited:
So is the site ever coming back up?

ETA: It was down every time I checked today and now says no vouchers available :hmm:
 
e2a: missed this will be back in a few minutes as there is guidance I will get for you

from the information for shops

https://fixyourbikevoucherscheme.est.org.uk/Downloads/Fix Your Bike Voucher Scheme - Shop Information Pack.pdf

page 12





BPR are great, my second choice of cycle shop - I got to Birmingham Bike Foundry in Stirchley usually, partly because I know some of the people who run it and partly because it's a co-op but it's great having two excellent bike repair places on my doorstep.



I've been listening to radio news today (or yesterday maybe it was) and the focus of that has been on the advertising rule changes, really not much about cycling when talking about the obesity thing, although there's been lots of other cycling things like the repair voucher scheme and the plans for new cycling infrastructure.
Thing about bikes is you're killing three birds with one stone - physical activity, rush hour congestion and air pollution/climate change. Walking is also being promoted through the cycling & walking schemes paid for through new infrastructure which will also hopefully address the safety issue. There's been new guidance released by the highways agency which I haven't had the chance to look at myself but I'm reliably informed is looking really good (as long as it's acted on anyway) so fingers crossed.

Where I live is one of the places in Birmingham that has been mentioned earlier in the thread as getting a filtered neighbourhood treatment which is going to include a short pedestrianised section on one of the side streets off the high street (sadly kings heath high street itself is a major A road and there's no real opportunity for a bypass for all the through traffic as it'd be great if that would be pedestrianised as well, but they are taking out on street parking to widen the pavements (has already happened because of covid-19) as well as putting in the filters to prevent rat running down the residential side roads off the high street. It should all help encourage people to walk rather than drive to the high street, as well as improving things for cyclists.



The cycle to work scheme has some major flaws but if you don't get caught by them it's really brilliant scheme from the govt. Your employer buys the bike, claims back the VAT and doesn't charge it on to you, so you immediately save ~20%. You pay for it over 12 months, interest free, taken from your pay packet before tax, so you don't pay income tax/NI on it either, which reduces the price further by a % that depends on your tax bracket. There's a bigger payment at the end but I can't remember the details of how that works. It can save you a lot of money on a bike and you pay for it over a year. You can also use it to buy accessories like lights, helmet etc.

The problems are that it's a maximum £1,000 which is entry level for an ebike afaik. There has been talk of raising that limit but I don't think it's happened. Other problem is that employers cannot, by law, make deductions from your pay that would take you below minimum wage. This is simply not allowed for any reason, so someone in a minimum wage job can't use the cycle to work scheme, even though they are the people who will benefit most :( If you're close to minimum wage you might not be able to spend the full £1,000.
You also can't use it for second hand bikes, which is especially bad right now since I understand that new bikes under £500 are hard to come by.

You also don't need a licence for a bike or e-bike but most councils offer cheap or free adult cycling training which would be recommended.

Thank you BigTom, so technically I qualify for the griptape. It is getting fucked and I am skint so may give it a go.
 
So is the site ever coming back up?

ETA: It was down every time I checked today and now says no vouchers available :hmm:

I thought you were talking about this site for a second - as if everything wasn't already confusing enough! :D
 
So is the site ever coming back up?

ETA: It was down every time I checked today and now says no vouchers available :hmm:

The official line is that they are releasing them in batches so as not to overload the available supply of bike mechanics, which does make some sense but could definitely be handled better than an occasional mad rush for people to try to claim the batch of 50,000 vouchers they release. Let people register, put them in a queue and give them a date when they'll get their voucher rather than release batches occasionally.
 
The official line is that they are releasing them in batches so as not to overload the available supply of bike mechanics, which does make some sense but could definitely be handled better than an occasional mad rush for people to try to claim the batch of 50,000 vouchers they release. Let people register, put them in a queue and give them a date when they'll get their voucher rather than release batches occasionally.
We can only assume that such great good sense would have incurred slightly higher costs and therefore lower margins for the corporation holding the out-sourced contract to administer this 'scheme'. Hence, it won't happen.
 
You also don't need a licence for a bike or e-bike but most councils offer cheap or free adult cycling training which would be recommended.

You do need a licence if you want to legally ride an e-bike on the public roads with a motor of more than 250 watts, which is a fucking pathetic limit in my opinion. Plus some other shit limitations I can't remember right now.
 
You do need a licence if you want to legally ride an e-bike on the public roads with a motor of more than 250 watts, which is a fucking pathetic limit in my opinion.

Too high? Too low? Too "non-imperial units"?

<it sounds quite high>
 
Too fucking low. You can buy hairdryers with better output.

They produce heat.
Pro cyclists put out about 200 to 300 watts in motive force (on average, over a long race).

It's about a third of a horse.

I'm not factoring in drive train loss, and ebikes are heavier than regular bikes too, but it still seems like a fair bit.

(not a bike expert)
 
Too fucking low. You can buy hairdryers with better output.

I was highly skeptical of ebikes and then used a friend's briefly the other day. I think they're brilliant now, and hers was an old model. How much power do you want, it zoomed up hills! I think the advantages of newer ones are better battery life and a lower weight now.

I'd totally get one when I was unable to cycle as normal, or had a very long commute. I'd highly recommend people give them a go if they think they might be useful for them, they fill a really nice gap between cycling and a car I think.
 
Last edited:
They produce heat.
Pro cyclists put out about 200 to 300 watts in motive force.

It's about a third of a horse.

I'm not factoring in drive train loss, but it still seems like a fair bit.

Pro cyclists are using just their muscles, so little wonder their output doesn't amount to much. Horse aren't that much either. They can get blown by the shittiest moped or scooter.
 
Pro cyclists are using just their muscles, so little wonder their output doesn't amount to much.

Yeah, but being in the 'muscles' range of things is why you don't need a license.
If you have your own muscles plus some decent e-muscles powering your bicycle, that seems like a fairly generous limit.

You want a motor vehicle that goes more in the person-killing range of speeds, get a fucking license.

</road safety campaigner performative anger>
 
According to Strava, when I was 52 years old with a BMI of 33 on a heavy bike, mostly gently uphill, when I was making a bit of an effort on the local railway path I averaged 250 watts over 9 miles / 37 minutes / average speed 14.4mph.
 
Back
Top Bottom