Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Golliwog in the window - should this really be in court?

How do you build class solidarity with white people in economically disenfranchised communities if your spiel is that they’re privileged? It’s bonkers.

Not sure about that. My parents grew up in poverty. Lived in derelict houses etc. The male side of the family was just mentally fucked up. Drugs and alcohol featured. We were and still are privileged because of the colour of our skin. I think all of us would have had worse experiences if we had not had white skin. I try to imagine it and it just twists my head up. I have found it hard enough.
 
I dunno. Not sure how that means you shouldn’t be aware of your privileges
You think police bullying is unique to black people? That the police are racist cunts shouldn’t be a reason to place economically disadvantaged white people in some special category.
It’s this sort of thing that turns people away from progressive politics. That Spymaster can see this but you can’t is truly perplexing.
 
Not sure about that. My parents grew up in poverty. Lived in derelict houses etc. The male side of the family was just mentally fucked up. Drugs and alcohol featured. We were and still are privileged because of the colour of our skin. I think all of us would have had worse experiences if we had not had white skin. I try to imagine it and it just twists my head up. I have found it hard enough.
I work in a well paid job in London. Several of my BAME colleagues drive sleek motors and have never complained about being pulled over because of it. Maybe they live in the right areas…
 
You think police bullying is unique to black people? That the police are racist cunts shouldn’t be a reason to place economically disadvantaged white people in some special category.
It’s this sort of thing that turns people away from progressive politics. That Spymaster can see this but you can’t is truly perplexing.
It's not that it's unique, it's that statistically black people are subjected to police attention more often than white people, and as a result have a specific relationship generated that is less prevalent in white populations. It's obviously inaccurate to suggest that white people can't experience police bullying, and class-related factors can easily reproduce (or on the flip side partly eliminate) similar symptoms of prejudice/habitual activity, but it's not systemic across the entire white population based on that instant visual cue and the actions required to work through it are thus different, likely with an added layer of complexity.
 
I'll tell you who hates, absolutely fucking hates, "checking their privilege"...

...white, middle-class, middle-aged straight men. They (we?) cannot stand the idea that their (our?) position in society is the result of anything except their (our?) individual hard-work and wise choices.
 
It's not that it's unique, it's that statistically black people are subjected to police attention more often than white people, and as a result have a specific relationship generated that is less prevalent in white populations. It's obviously inaccurate to suggest that white people can't experience police bullying, and class-related factors can easily reproduce (or on the flip side partly eliminate) similar symptoms, but it's not systemic across the entire white population based on that instant visual cue and the actions required to work through it are thus different, likely with an added layer of complexity.
The police are racist cunts so I won’t argue that BAME can attract more grief from them. But at a time where we have both a BAME prime minister (with a bank account filled with millions) and Home Secretary, the term has plumbed new depths as to how useful it is to actually attract disenfranchised people towards class politics imo.
 
It's not that it's unique, it's that statistically black people are subjected to police attention more often than white people, and as a result have a specific relationship generated that is less prevalent in white populations. It's obviously inaccurate to suggest that white people can't experience police bullying, and class-related factors can easily reproduce (or on the flip side partly eliminate) similar symptoms of prejudice/habitual activity, but it's not systemic across the entire white population based on that instant visual cue and the actions required to work through it are thus different, likely with an added layer of complexity.
Yeah, and this is where intersectionality can be very useful, but only if one of the categories it considers is economic class. Otherwise you end up with things like the grotesque Women's Party, or whatever it was called, fronted by extremely rich white women claiming to represent the political interests of all women. No, a woman working in a factory shares political interests first and foremost with the people she is working alongside, female or male, not someone in the boardroom deciding how best to cut all their wages just because she's a woman.
 
Yeah, and this is where intersectionality can be very useful, but only if one of the categories it considers is economic class. Otherwise you end up with things like the grotesque Women's Party, or whatever it was called, fronted by extremely rich white women claiming to represent the political interests of all women. No, a woman working in a factory shares political interests first and foremost with the people she is working alongside, female or male, not someone in the boardroom deciding how best to cut all their wages just because she's a woman.
I loathe how class is a spoke on the wheel of intersection theory. It should be the axle.
 
Yeah, and this is where intersectionality can be very useful, but only if one of the categories it considers is economic class. Otherwise you end up with things like the grotesque Women's Party, or whatever it was called, fronted by extremely rich white women claiming to represent the political interests of all women. No, a woman working in a factory shares political interests first and foremost with the people she is working alongside, female or male, not someone in the boardroom deciding how best to cut all their wages just because she's a woman.
Are you speaking on behalf of working class women?
 
Also, if (a big if, I'll grant you) it is to have any use as a tool I figure it entails a reflection upon one's own privileges rather than attempting to tell others theirs.

Yeah I think so. I mean I agree with a lot of the criticism here of the way identity politics is used but equally I think that rejection can be used to prop up the sort of attitudes you can see when someone pops up on a thread about gendered violence for example to start with the not all men pickiness.
 
Do you mean more about day to day stuff like getting followed in shops or searched by the police or convinced by juries etc? cos I would regard all of that as racism.

Maybe the privilege term has a different meaning to different people at the moment. But am I 'privileged' in not getting harased in town by the police cos I'm white? I suppose it's the term I don't much like, obviously the social issues are very real and important.
It’s not just about getting more hassle from the filth.
There’s so much more that skews the system against minorities - from education to health to employment. I’m not going to educate you on it. You’ve been reading the same things I have.
And I’m not sure why you think white people should feel guilty. Perhaps you have a guilty conscience cos I’ve never felt any pressure or expectation to feel guilt about an accident of birth
 
Thread about racism against black people turns into "what about white people".

Of course there is discrimination against white working class people.

But why not start a different thread about it?
 
Yeah, and this is where intersectionality can be very useful, but only if one of the categories it considers is economic class. Otherwise you end up with things like the grotesque Women's Party, or whatever it was called, fronted by extremely rich white women claiming to represent the political interests of all women. No, a woman working in a factory shares political interests first and foremost with the people she is working alongside, female or male, not someone in the boardroom deciding how best to cut all their wages just because she's a woman.

That's explicitly the opposite of what intersectionality was supposed to be, no? The whole point of its conception was that feminism tended to centre the concerns of wealthy white women over others.
 
That's explicitly the opposite of what intersectionality was supposed to be, no? The whole point of its conception was that feminism tended to centre the concerns of wealthy white women over others.
Yes, and Fay Weldon spoke about how she regretted some of the forms feminism took in the 60s and 70s for this very reason. But that's the point about including social/economic class in the mix. Centring on it, even, as Magnus said. Not everyone who is using the tools of intersectionality does this. It's a good idea that can easily get mangled, as seen with the recent women's party.
 
Given we’re mates I imagine they would.
Not necessarily.jyst because they haven't complained about being pulled over or told you about being pulled over, it doesn't mean that they've never been pulled over by the police.

Go and read the statistics regarding black stop and search Vs white stop and search. Go and read about how black children are six times more likely to be subjected to a strip search that white children.
 
When these people are saying they're not racist, they're not claiming they don't hate people because of their ethnicity, they're claiming that the way they behave is deemed culturally acceptable and therefore you're not allowed to insult them over it.
Recently had an argument with (white American) drinking associate, who reckons he's liberal and he's of the opinion that BLM and trans rights have "gone too far".

What does that even mean?

Straight white males are trembling at the thought of some kind of equality?
 
That's explicitly the opposite of what intersectionality was supposed to be, no? The whole point of its conception was that feminism tended to centre the concerns of wealthy white women over others.
I think the dynamics differ somewhat in the US, where I suspect the theory stems from, than the UK. Which confuses it somewhat given how UK centric this board is.
 
Straight white males are trembling at the thought of some kind of equality?
I suspect the greater tremble is to do with a sense of being loosed from the comfort of sameness. Knowing your position in the world and its general ruleset is a big, scary pillar to kick away and for all the puffery about toughness and stoic competence, most blokes aren't well equipped for that even before you get to the bit of making room for others.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom