Personally I'm thinking of moving to HK or Sing for a bit........
Give me a call, hipipol.
I'd be happy to work with (or place,) you and, if place, I'll split the placement fee with you (70%/30% - me/you).
Fair?
R-to-R's an interesting area.
Woof
Personally I'm thinking of moving to HK or Sing for a bit........
thats really about market structure surely?
Your only going to move in size if you can take the hit such a market event will provoke - or if you're Citi and you actually want to create the wave in the first place (the German Govt were not amused, and fined them several million Euros, but they were nearly 2b bucks up and dinnae gae a fuck)
Most HFT are small and really just create a froth, dont really move the market at all.
Personally I'm thinking of moving to HK or Sing for a bit........
To me (reading between the lines,) it says: "China - the biggest eva bubble."
Tom Holland's been churning out some really insightful stuff in the "Monitor" column for the last few weeks (daily on the back page of the Business Post, Mon - Fri).
A record 37.2 million people, or about one out of every eight Americans, received food stamps in September, as the recession drove a surging jobless rate, according to a government report.
Drugs and crime chief says $352bn in criminal proceeds was effectively laundered by financial institutions
Drugs money worth billions of dollars kept the financial system afloat at the height of the global crisis, the United Nations' drugs and crime tsar has told the Observer.
Antonio Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, said he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were "the only liquid investment capital" available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result.
This will raise questions about crime's influence on the economic system at times of crisis. It will also prompt further examination of the banking sector as world leaders, including Barack Obama and Gordon Brown, call for new International Monetary Fund regulations. Speaking from his office in Vienna, Costa said evidence that illegal money was being absorbed into the financial system was first drawn to his attention by intelligence agencies and prosecutors around 18 months ago. "In many instances, the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor," he said.
Some of the evidence put before his office indicated that gang money was used to save some banks from collapse when lending seized up, he said.
"Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities... There were signs that some banks were rescued that way." Costa declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drugs money, saying that would be inappropriate because his office is supposed to address the problem, not apportion blame. But he said the money is now a part of the official system and had been effectively laundered.
"That was the moment [last year] when the system was basically paralysed because of the unwillingness of banks to lend money to one another. The progressive liquidisation to the system and the progressive improvement by some banks of their share values [has meant that] the problem [of illegal money] has become much less serious than it was," he said.
^^
ffs! I suppose it doesn't really come as a big surprise...
Costa said evidence that illegal money was being absorbed into the financial system was first drawn to his attention by intelligence agencies and prosecutors around 18 months ago.
Who's 'we've'?
It is an exploration of the dangers, not a forecast.
Under the French bank's "Bear Case" scenario (the gloomiest of three possible outcomes),
Guilty as charged, m'ludUndiscriminating people link to article with misleading title, probably without reading it:
More than calling for cooperation, today I had state government implement various emergency measures meant to ensure Arizona’s fiscal solvency. Among them:
- I ordered the Arizona Department of Corrections to return to the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) -- as soon as possible -- all non-violent criminal aliens as is allowed under existing law. These inmates are the responsibility of the federal government (as is securing our border with Mexico). Arizona should not have to bear this cost.
- I am restating my Arizonans-only directives to state agencies to ensure that public benefits are provided only to those who are legally in this country and who reside in this state.
- Effective immediately, I have ordered all state agencies who benefits to citizens to implement means testing and sliding fee schedules. While the government safety net must stay in place, we need to secure help only for the neediest among us.
Many US states are going bust. Arizona is the first, amidst a sea of faux-statistics designed to manufacture an illusion of "recovery", to have reached the point where it cannot be disguised any more.
Here is the text of a letter from its Governor to Arizonans:
A famously gun-happy State turning loose prisoners, switching off public services and withdrawing support (for border control) from the Federal government? It does have the ring of a near-future Dystopian Hollywood movie about it, doesn´t it?
The false recovery was manufactured by the Federal Government borrowing trillions. The interest repayments (on top of the loan repayments) kick in next year, while of course there has been no increase in the supply of energy and therefore of the physical production of goods and services to fund them. So more States will tip over the edge.
Merry Christmas.
Gibeon said:Yeah its a terrible situation for the motor city that.
I remember reading that sections of it get closed off and are run by private security firms. It might be a load of rubbish but this is the article:
http://www.almartinraw.com/public/column417.html
Millions of Chinese are pursuing property with a zeal once typical of house-happy Americans. Some Chinese are plunking down wads of cash for homes. Others are taking out mortgages at record levels. Developers are snapping up land for luxury high- rises and villas, and the banks are eagerly funding them. Some local officials are even building towns from scratch in the desert, certain that demand won’t flag. And if families can swing it, they buy two apartments: one to live in, one to flip when prices jump further.
“Once the bubble pops, our economic growth will stop,” warns Yi Xianrong, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences’ Finance Research Center.
Economists estimate that half of all local government revenue comes from selling state-owned land.
Companies in the chemical, steel, textile, and shoe industries have started up property divisions too: The chance of a quick return is much higher than in their primary business.
One is the anger of ordinary Chinese. In a recent survey by the People’s Bank of China, two-thirds of respondents said real estate prices were too high.
In early December five professors at Peking University wrote to the National People’s Congress calling for changes to a land seizure and demolition law and accusing developers of usurping the government’s role when taking land for construction.
The law is leading to “mass incidents” and “extreme events,” the professors warned.
The government is reluctant to crack down too hard because construction, steel, cement, furniture, and other sectors are directly tied to growth in real estate. In November, for example, retail sales of furniture and construction materials jumped more than 40 percent.
There has been zero net job creation since December 1999. No previous decade going back to the 1940s had job growth of less than 20 percent. Economic output rose at its slowest rate of any decade since the 1930s as well.
Middle-income households made less in 2008, when adjusted for inflation, than they did in 1999 -- and the number is sure to have declined further during a difficult 2009. The Aughts were the first decade of falling median incomes since figures were first compiled in the 1960s.
And the net worth of American households -- the value of their houses, retirement funds and other assets minus debts -- has also declined when adjusted for inflation, compared with sharp gains in every previous decade since data were initially collected in the 1950s
Yes but that has been underpinned by huge surges in government borrowing replacing consumer borrowing. Governments around the world are needing to cut back on spending and that means drops in employment and reduction in pay increases. What will drive growth this decade as the baby boomers need to hoard cash to retire?The financial crisis is, for all practical purposes, over, and forecasters are now generally expecting the job market to turn around early in 2010 and begin creating jobs. The task ahead for the next generation of economists is to figure out how, in a decade that began with such economic promise, things went so wrong.
Immigration.What will drive growth this decade as the baby boomers need to hoard cash to retire?
America's love affair with the automobile could be sputtering to an end. Some 14m cars were taken out of action in 2009, 4m more than rolled off the assembly lines and onto the roads, a report from the Earth Policy Institute said today.
Eh?U.S. residential mortgage originations are expected to plummet 40 percent in 2010 to their lowest level in a decade, eclipsing a forecast drop made just one month ago, the industry's main trade group said Tuesday.
Lenders will underwrite $1.28 trillion in home loans this year, down from $2.11 trillion in 2009, the Mortgage Bankers Association said in its latest forecast. That would be the lowest since $1.14 trillion in 2000.
The forecast was downgraded from December, when the MBA predicted originations would fall about 24 percent.
a rise in interest rates from record lows would bring mortgage originations "to a pretty hard stop."
CNBCInterest rates are expected to rise when the Federal Reserve completes its pledge to support the mortgage securities market with $1.25 trillion in purchases.
But then agains as others are keen to point out. I dont really know what Im talking about .
. . .
Dunno, the chances of a rates increase may be slight without a big surge in inflation.