GM faces bankruptcy.[/URL]
Bankruptcy protection in the US is a standard mechanism for keeping creditors at bay while restructuring the company. Its not equivalent to bankruptcy here
GM faces bankruptcy.[/URL]
Len Blum, managing director at investment banking firm Westwood Capital LLC in New York, told Bloomberg News. “The only thing that’s been holding GM back is labor contracts and relationships with debtors and franchisees. All that should be cleansed in a bankruptcy.”
This would be the Chinese economic miracle you've previously spent whole threads praising, or is that a completely different Chinese economic miracle?
One of America's top mortgage tycoons, Angelo Mozilo, was charged with fraud and insider dealing today for allegedly lying to investors about a toxic build-up of billions of dollars in reckless loans at his Countrywide Financial homeloans empire.
Mozilo has been widely vilified as the "sub-prime king", accused by unions and politicians of exploiting customers with predatory mortgages. Charles Schumer, a prominent Democratic senator for New York, recently suggested that Mozilo should be "boiled in oil - figuratively".
In one 2006 message to a colleague, Mozilo wrote: "The bottom line is that we are flying blind on how these loans will perform in a stressed environment of higher unemployment, reduced values and slowing home sales."
The company subsequently caused a rumpus in Congress when it emerged that several influential politicians, including the chairman of the Senate banking committee, Christopher Dodd, were given special mortgages as part of a VIP list of "friends of Angelo".
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The U.S. economy likely lost another half-million jobs in May, economists say, bringing the total number of nonfarm payrolls lost in the recession to more than 6.2 million, with few signs of a recovery in the badly battered labor market.
But the US figures are very badly massaged.The unemployment rate is expected to rise from 8.9% in April to 9.2% in May. It would be the highest jobless rate since 1983.
Millions more workers still have a job but have had their hours cut back. With unemployment rising, workers have little bargaining power with bosses over wages. Income from private-sector wages and salaries has fallen at a record 5% annual rate since October, squeezing families just as their wealth has eroded and credit is harder to obtain.
"We continue to expect the unemployment rate to rise well into 2010, peaking somewhere around 10.6%," wrote economists for Wachovia.
The Congressionally-appointed panel overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) recommends running again the stress tests on US banks, as economic conditions have worsened, its chair, Harvard University professor Elizabeth Warren, told CNBC Tuesday.
"We actually make recommendations to do it all over again right now," Warren told "Squawk Box."
"We've already blown past the worst-case scenario on unemployment," she added.
Under the tests, whose results were released in May, the Obama administration asked federal regulators to examine how financial institutions would hold up under two different economic scenarios as well as how much new capital they would need to raise to shore up their balance sheets.
No, no. Apparently the green shoots are growing all over the place, property is going to resume its permanent upward trajectory, credit lines are being loosened up, and all is well with the world. I, for one, welcome the shortest-lived catastrophic global depression in history
From the London Review of Books:
'It's Finished' by John Lanchester
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n10/lanc01_.html
We are basicaly going to experiance the 1980s we never had because a) we had oil to bring in cash on foreign exchange b) London managed to retain its self as a world leading financial center through the 'big bang' deregulation and stronger pound. Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong, NY, and many other centers are keen to get in on the action and a weakening pound may see a flight of capital undermining the already weak state of the financial sector.From the London Review of Books:
'It's Finished' by John Lanchester
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n10/lanc01_.html
There is also the demographic changes in the west, the retirement of the babyboomers. The worlds great consumer societies will have a smaller portion of their populations buying as much. And as you say the imbalances will mean those of working age will be earning less or unemployed.IMO, This s probably "The Big One" and is only just beginning.
There will be dead cat bounces, but.........
The imbalances in the global economy have become so severe that it will take years to reach bottom, and possibly decades before "the west" enjoys the standards of living taken for granted until 2006.
The "banking crisis" was the result of global economic imbalance and the ensuing global recession. And the unwinding of this financial mess, will almost certainly create a future economic and social climate unseen by most posters here and almost unconceivable, to most, in its severity.
This is the beginning.
*is always the optimist*
Woof
Well, quite. Even the Swiss franc is in trouble with the size of their banks. Canadian or Aus dollars I reckon. Any rich country with a shit load of minerals.Though on the other hand everyone is always saying 'get out of the pound'. Ive never worked out which currency you are supposed to get into?
From the London Review of Books:
'It's Finished' by John Lanchester
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n10/lanc01_.html
If the global economic crisis can be reduced to one single phenomenon, it is this: the fact that nobody knows which banks are solvent.
Well, quite. Even the Swiss franc is in trouble with the size of their banks. Canadian or Aus dollars I reckon. Any rich country with a shit load of minerals.
Gold?
On the whole minerals are not much good if there is a world oversupply of them and mines are shutting down.Well, quite. Even the Swiss franc is in trouble with the size of their banks. Canadian or Aus dollars I reckon. Any rich country with a shit load of minerals.
They have a very healthy trade surplus
The crisis represents a dramatic fall not only for Mr Schwarzenegger but for America’s Golden State. It faces a $24 billion (£14 billion) deficit in the fiscal year starting on July 1 — nearly $700 per head of population.
The story of today’s deficits starts in January 2001, as President Bill Clinton was leaving office. The Congressional Budget Office estimated then that the government would run an average annual surplus of more than $800 billion a year from 2009 to 2012. Today, the government is expected to run a $1.2 trillion annual deficit in those years.
You can think of that roughly $2 trillion swing as coming from four broad categories: the business cycle, President George W. Bush’s policies, policies from the Bush years that are scheduled to expire but that Mr. Obama has chosen to extend, and new policies proposed by Mr. Obama.
We are basicaly going to experiance the 1980s we never had because a) we had oil to bring in cash on foreign exchange b) London managed to retain its self as a world leading financial center through the 'big bang' deregulation and stronger pound. Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong, NY, and many other centers are keen to get in on the action and a weakening pound may see a flight of capital undermining the already weak state of the financial sector.
Though on the other hand everyone is always saying 'get out of the pound'. Ive never worked out which currency you are supposed to get into?
Gold?
And its plans for further regulation of the credit agencies are also vague as to how they will "strengthen the integrity of the ratings process" and "reduce the use of credit ratings in regulations and supervisory practice".