Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Global financial system implosion begins

I agree things are bad. Never said I didn't. But I don't think things ARE as doom and gloom and unrecoverable as people are saying.

As I posted, I guess that depends upon whether you are "still making on it. A lot".


Many, many, tens of millions of peeps have been royally fucked-over by those "still making on it" - a majority unlikely to recover in a generation.





:(



Woof
 
Gerald Celente reckons the bailout bubble is about to burst, leading to the the collapse of the financial system.

link

:eek:
 
You missed the freedom of speech bit of the credit agencies defense:rolleyes:

Oh well, no takers on this, pity a few thoughts revolved this afternoon. Freedom of speech is the defense the credit rating agencies are using in the US - what we are offering is opinion and in no way can opinion legally implicate us to commercial decisions made from hearing it...and so the credit rating agencies avoid culpability in the US. would like to know what UK defense is, to stick to same avoids large bill, but my understanding is that UK defamation rules are different, slander (spoken) you can't compalin if someone says what they like provided they can prove it, liable (written) all you have to prove is does you disservice.....if all credit rating is just an opinion then surely a bad credit rating is liable under UK law. Bearing in mind the same logic as stopped people writing negative comments on references.
 
Oh well, no takers on this...

I agree that it seems extraordinary that the credit ratings agencies who rated complex financial assets as triple A, when they were anything but, should turn around and state that they should not be expected to reform. They are generally paid by the banks to rate the assets and it is therefore suggested that they tend to do what their paymasters tell them to do.

It would seem obvious that the credit agencies need to be above reproach and I would suggest that their independence needs to be assured at the very least.
 
This conflict of interest (the issuer of debt derivatives paying the agencies to get their "AAA" banners slapped on dogs-dinner-debt,) was one of the central problems in my view.

Until this is resolved, it'll be more of the same.



Woof
 
This conflict of interest (the issuer of debt derivatives paying the agencies to get their "AAA" banners slapped on dogs-dinner-debt,) was one of the central problems in my view.

Until this is resolved, it'll be more of the same.



Woof

I agree - we also need to find a way to let the banks fail while maintaining the supply of money to the people... If the banks bankrupt themselves then fine, but atm they seem able to do so and then still get paid thru a bailout.

It is thus not too surprising that other industries are complaining that they are not getting support when faced with the sharp end of the market/competition - until this crisis it was government policy to let failing companies fold thus enabling more flexible and smaller companies to rise and take their place. Schumpeter called it Creative Destruction.
 
I agree - we also need to find a way to let the banks fail while maintaining the supply of money to the people... If the banks bankrupt themselves then fine, but atm they seem able to do so and then still get paid thru a bailout.


Let all banks fail as they might.

Nationalise the Co-Op bank (or something similar, pay the members a few hundred quid each).


Pump any needed public money into this bank and give free money to all comers in small, medium business or individuals.

It would be far cheaper and far more effective than pissing money away into the abyss of CDS's.

Of course, after the first, knee jerk, GBP 100,000,000,000 had been chucked into these sectors, a more measured approach could be taken. Unlike what we have now, where many more tens, or even hundreds, of billions of dollars will be thrown into the black hole of the finance sector ....... "banks".

Madness!




It is thus not too surprising that other industries are complaining that they are not getting support when faced with the sharp end of the market/competition - until this crisis it was government policy to let failing companies fold thus enabling more flexible and smaller companies to rise and take their place. Schumpeter called it Creative Destruction.


It's the nature of the beast. Every western politician is in thrall of (and in the pocket of,) the wealthy. Ergo, the wealthy get the bail out.


I'd havge started with chucking GBP 100b at the wee gals and guys and let the banks fuck off.


But then, I'm not in thrall of, nor in debt to, The Masters of The Universe.




The UK is likely to take on getting close to an additional GBP trillion of debt over the next few years (unless no-one will buy it, or public spending cuts are introduced that make Maggie look like a socialist Goddess).


With GBP 100b, every UK adult could probably receive, @ GBP 3,000 tax free cash in the first tranche, including all those losing their jobs as a result of the bank meltdown.


A trillion GBP would give each of them @ GBP 30,000. I'm sure that would stimulate the economy.


Obviously this is a first draft, but I guess it all depends whether you believe in a trickle down or a bottom up approach.


Details can be worked out.


:)


Woof
 
Gerald Celente reckons the bailout bubble is about to burst, leading to the the collapse of the financial system.

link

:eek:

He sounds like a fucking tool

“When this bubble bursts, there’s no reinflating it because of the government intervention into it so deeply,”

“We could call this fascism lite,” he said, referring to the government involvement in free enterprise. “After these kind of catastrophic collapses, sometimes they’re followed by war.”
 
Pound strong against dollar again, amid signs of recovery:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8076713.stm

Still quite possible that things will collapse further but there are certainly signs that recovery is coming, with the longer term damage perhaps restricted to certain sectors (eg car manufacturing).

Oil price is also rising again, as it always does at this time of year, but the media dont seem to refer to the routine seasonal changes like they used to, its all about the global economy recovering apparently.

If things do recover by years end then I will give a little more credence to the theory that all of this could well have ben oil supply related, supply didnt keep up with demand, brakes were slammed on, buffer between supply and demand grows rapidly, behavioural changes occur, release breaks.
 
The World Economic Situation and Prospects 2009 update has just been published and it pretty much undermines any talk of a recovery geting roling - as does a US Commerce Department on the first quarter of 09 release over the weekend - which also contained this nugget:

financial sector income, which soared by 94.9 per cent
 
Pound strong against dollar again, amid signs of recovery:

Or alternatively Dollar weak against a basket of currencies?

The World Economic Situation and Prospects 2009 update has just been published and it pretty much undermines any talk of a recovery geting roling - as does a US Commerce Department on the first quarter of 09 release over the weekend - which also contained this nugget:

Interesting link, thanks. I don't see many green shoots either.

GM faces bankruptcy.

Car giant General Motors (GM) has filed for bankruptcy protection, marking the biggest failure of an industrial company in US history.

The White House is also due to announce an extra $30bn (£18.5bn) of aid for GM.

...

GM, which had already received $20bn of state aid since the end of last year, said in its bankruptcy filing that its current debts total $173bn.
 
In recessions you don't tend to see economic decline in a straight line, so you will tend to see green shoots - and small spurts of growth in certain sectors. Once these small spurts peter out though, you get another period of decline, followed by further small spurts of growth, with each contraction taking things lower than the previous one. The overall trajectory, over time, looks to be down.
 
Depends on what the USGs holding of 60% of the company ends up being worth really...

Heh!

Socialism in the US.

The nationalisation of the car industry.

:D

What fun. British Leyland all over again - American Stylee.




Oh dear peeps.

Game over.

Batten down the hatches.

When I say "peeps", of course, I mean ordinary peeps - the millions that are going to lose their livelyhoods and homes (over 30 million in China already).

Cut back, fast.There will be many "green shoots" and "dead cat bounces" in the coming decade.


And the fat cats will take the cream (and even the milk) from these bounces and then viciously "short" during the downturns, to cream themselves again as we slide into global poverty.


Beware.

This is "The Big One".


:(



Woof
 
I don't see many green shoots either.

GM faces bankruptcy.
Here are the greenshoots people see.
Treasury 10-year yields surged the most in six months as stocks and commodities advanced on signs that the recession is abating, damping demand for the safety of government debt and stoking concern inflation may increase.

U.S. government securities fell for the first time in three days as yields on mortgage-backed bonds climbed, spurring investors to sell Treasuries as a hedge against rising interest rates. Reports showed manufacturing shrank at a slower pace and construction spending rose. The difference between two- and 10- year yields widened to 2.67 percentage points, approaching the record 2.76 percentage points set on May 27.

“The numbers were stronger than expected,” said Donald Ellenberger, who oversees about $6 billion as co-head of government and mortgage-backed securities at Federated Investors in Pittsburgh. “There’s a real debate on whether we should be worried about deflation or inflation. More recently the debate has turned to inflation.”

Spending on construction in the U.S. rose 0.8 percent in April, the biggest gain since August, Commerce Department figures showed in Washington. Manufacturing in the U.S. shrank in May at the slowest pace in eight months.
Bloomberg story
The US governement has made guargantuan amounts of money available for financial institutions and other sources to spend. Some of that money is now filtering into the economy slowing the rate of decline and in some places creating small upticks as growth, or so it seems to me.
Cut back, fast.There will be many "green shoots" and "dead cat bounces" in the coming decade.

Well the vast gap in pensions is not getting filled, people who were spenders 2 years ago now need to accumulate wealth for retirement. All that government and private debt will need to be payed down and if the US does not show significant growth soon people will begin to doubt its ability to grow and start charging more too lend to the US.

On the other hand official Chinese statistics have it growing at about 6% pa. Much of their stimulus is supposed to have gone to the less well off. The same old problem exists with China though and that is the veracity of the official version.
 
When I say "peeps", of course, I mean ordinary peeps - the millions that are going to lose their livelyhoods and homes (over 30 million in China already).
Still, more pain for some U.S. factories and workers is ahead. Detroit-based GM, the world’s largest carmaker until its 77-year reign ended last year, said it will close 12 more plants by the end of 2011 under an accelerated plan to shutter 30 percent of its U.S. factories.
link
 
2009-03-04%20absence%20of%20bounce%20in%20economy%20Stevens%20600.JPG



:hmm:


Woof
 
Back
Top Bottom