Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ghostbusters reboot

The Internet, which is dominated by geek boys, many of whom are idiots.

The "critic" for Cinemassacre", refuses to review the film and has been called "heroic" for it. Somehow he didn't mind reviewing all the male lead reboots, remakes and somesuch: Twitter Shits Itself After Whiny Man-Baby Refuses To Review 'Ghostbusters'


To be fair to James Rolfe (aka the angry video game nerd) he mainly reviews bad video games. He has a fan base who being part of this not so great audience really want him to to one of his angry rip it to shreds reviews like he does for atrocious video games. He just made a video explaining why he wasn't looking forward to the movie and wasn't going to review it.

also he has never reviewed a ghost busters movie. Just the games.

He is a big ghost busters fan and has done related videos but only really parody videos and the like


hi new video really does feel like a follow up to this video he made in 2007 talking about the possibilities of there being a GB III

Ghostbusters 3 – My Honest Thoughts
 
Last edited:
We saw this today and all agreed that it was rather fun.

The kids found it just terrifying enough and enjoyed the big guns etc and we liked the jokes that went over their heads and looking out for members of the original cast. Worth the ticket price, I'd say. Not a bad effort.
 
We saw this today and all agreed that it was rather fun.

The kids found it just terrifying enough and enjoyed the big guns etc and we liked the jokes that went over their heads and looking out for members of the original cast. Worth the ticket price, I'd say. Not a bad effort.

Did you see it in 2D or 3D? Apparently it's well worth seeing in 3D
 
Did you see it in 2D or 3D? Apparently it's well worth seeing in 3D
3D is lost on me since I can only see through one eye at a time. But there were lots of big "surprise" ghosts so it probably would lend itself to it very well. I'm afraid I have no idea how 3D works for others though - if you've never had any depth perception it's hard to imagine!
 
It was an odd way to market it, choosing all of the parts of the film that weren't funny or scary to put in the trailer, but somehow that seems to be what happened. :confused:

Better because the trailer normally makes the film redundant.
 
I fucking LOVED it.

I cried at the end, not gonna lie. I was obsessed with Ghostbusters as a kid and this film was like every pretend-game and Ghostbusters story I ever made up about it. Seeing a film with women in the leads where none of them are raped, or assaulted, or mocked, or demeaned in any way, was so refreshing I didn't realise how much I needed to see it until it was up there on screen. It gives subtle, funny nods to the originals without making it clear HEY THIS WAS IN THE ORIGINAL FILM which meant if you'd never seen the 1984 film you're not going to miss anything. The script is hilarious, the cast are awesome, and there are some genuinely creepy moments.

I hope it's a massive, incredible success and the shitbag racists and haters now hounding the cast suffer seeing women being excellent in all films from now on, because that's the least they deserve.
 
I saw this at the weekend, quite funny in places - good dialogue and I particularly liked the idea of a dumb male secretary.
 
I've never been a huge fan of the original Ghostbusters, I've got a feeling that I'll probably prefer this version.
 
Had zero interest in the Total Recall reboot, the Clash of the Titans, Man of Steel, Spiderman, Strawdogs, The Day the Earth Stood Still or dozens of other "reboots".

But now its a judgement on you not to like a reboot.




Did like the Christopher Nolan Batmans. The inference here is clear. :facepalm:
 
Haven't we known this for well over a decade or two by now ?

Her theory about Ghostbusters and how the studio turned around the backlash sounds plausible but I'm not going to agree or disagree till I see it myself (which will be a while, it's not a priority and I'm not going to go to a cinema for this)

Most reboots have been crap, but some I liked. I think the new Planet of the Apes films are the best Hollywood blockbusters currently going. The Star Trek reboot films have also been well received (two out of three anyway) and I too liked Nolan's Batman films.

If audiences keep flocking to films which are part of known franchises and if they don't support original films then that's what we will be getting for some time to come.
 
Last edited:
I think we should start calling them remakes again, rather than reboots. Lazy studio values shouldn't be rewarded with sexy new language.

I think Ghostbusters is perfect for an all female team. Whether it's any good or not, I don't know yet, but I fancy checking it out.
 
Just seen it. I kinda liked it.

It's mostly well put together but I felt the climax was weak.

The main problem was the humour. I found myself wincing almost as much as I smiled.

The dumb comedy kept booting me out of the movie.
 
Chris Hemsworth's Kevin was pretty analogous to Louis Tully, except without 'normal' guys around him (like Venkman and Stanz) people notice it more :D
 
I think we should start calling them remakes again, rather than reboots. Lazy studio values shouldn't be rewarded with sexy new language.

I think Ghostbusters is perfect for an all female team. Whether it's any good or not, I don't know yet, but I fancy checking it out.
I think rehash is best.
To boot is to load a program, and I think reboot means restarting a series of films specifically, rather than a one-off remake.
 
Reboot makes sense with something like Batman where they change the whole universe and mythology. Not so much with Ghostbusters where they just revive an old Franchise
 
I think rehash is best.
To boot is to load a program, and I think reboot means restarting a series of films specifically, rather than a one-off remake.
If Ghostbusters is successful, the purpose is to get a whole series of films going. Hollywood likes to make as a much money from as few ideas as possible and unless a film flops the idea always is to get a new franchise going.

They always tried to make more of a series of the previous Ghostbusters. The reason they never went beyond one sequel was because they didn't contract Bill Murray for more than one film and after the second film didn't turn out that well, he kept rejecting the screenplays for other sequels.Then a couple of years ago just as it looked they could get Murray to commit after all, Harold Ramis died.
 
I think rehash is best.
To boot is to load a program, and I think reboot means restarting a series of films specifically, rather than a one-off remake.

That's right. In my more extensive missive to Kermode, I have made the same distinction and suggested "remake" for individual films with the same story, and "rehash" for returning series. I agree with you.
 
Just seen it. I kinda liked it.

It's mostly well put together but I felt the climax was weak.

The main problem was the humour. I found myself wincing almost as much as I smiled.

The dumb comedy kept booting me out of the movie.

After some thought I can't help but feel disappointed in the film. If you asked me bits of the film I disliked I could list a bunch but if you asked me to name stuff I liked I would struggle to name more than one or two things.

The film isn't a disaster and I kinda enjoyed it but it is a disappointment. I can help but feel a little dubious about the inevitable franchising they are going to attempt.
 
I reckon it might have been a marketing strategy to get everyone to hate it

There was a thing that it was going to be awful, then it turns out that it's ok, lots of people wanted it to be awful. If it hadn't been 'the most hated trailer ever' then probably nobody would have cared
 
I reckon it might have been a marketing strategy to get everyone to hate it

There was a thing that it was going to be awful, then it turns out that it's ok, lots of people wanted it to be awful. If it hadn't been 'the most hated trailer ever' then probably nobody would have cared
Pretty sure it isn't the trailer which has caused the controversy.
 
Back
Top Bottom