The
study linked to earlier gives some sort of relative efficacies for different types of mask; if I've understood it properly, a cloth mask might be something around 50%, one of those basic medical ones maybe 60% and a "N95 respirator" 99%. So are those FFP2 ones that eg you can buy at Boots basically equivalent to what they call an "N95 respirator"?
(My image of what a "respirator" is, is based on things I've used for doing building work which are relatively complex things with valves and a rubber seal around the face and so on, not a fabric-type mask)
Also, that study is looking at the effect on what the wearer breathes out rather than what they breathe in. I can see that you could assume to some extent that the effect would be similar in reverse but are there any equivalent studies looking specifically at protection for the wearer?