Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

General aviation/airplane news and chat

Oh, so you have come across the scale modelling community before then? :D



Fogz5hGWIAAmhXC








AAA.png


Operation Solomon. Took off with 1086 passengers from ADD, landed TLV with 1088.
 
Not read this web page, just copied this quote...


As I cross the west coast of Florida near Ft. Meyers, a major airline route, ATC denies the descent request from Delta flight number 1366, an Airbus. “Unable your request, traffic your one o’clock, climbing through your altitude, a WW II fighter” There is a pause and the airliner pilot replies: “Say the type aircraft?”. Miami Center responds, “Ah, it’s a North American P-51 military fighter”. A long pause follows during which I spot the airliner’s contrails off my right wing. The pilot replies:” Oh, way cool!”. I am trying to imagine cruising in the Airbus cockpit at FL390 and being told that a WW II prop fighter is climbing through my altitude!

 
Hydrogen-powered flight developments:


As ever, storage is an issue, but I could see something like this being very viable for the short hop flights in Scottish islands for example. Plus they could manufacturer it from wind-generated electricity up there to be more sustainable.
 
I’ve just checked in for a helicopter flight (I’m working offshore for the next couple of weeks) at an airport I’ve not used for a couple of years. There is a new safety regulation…I’ve had to take my Bluetooth earphones out of the charger case…put the charger case in my pocket and the earpieces in the checked bag 🤷
They never X-ray stuff coming the other way, so you know it’s just being enforced on outbound flights. Oh, and I have to wear a mask 😷 . We had masks come back for a few months but for normal flights they gave up at the start of this month.

I’d love the job of inventing arcane regulations to make the travel experience a little more shit. Where do I apply?
 
It's the battery in the charger isn't it? If it goes off in the hold everyone dies but if it goes off in your pocket you get a bad burn and the plane fills with noxious smoke but will be manageable.

Just had a quick google and found this.

 
Whereas I don’t deny air travel in its present form is far from environmentally friendly, such navel-gazing articles are both over-simplistic and pointless. Countless activities or industrial processes are and will remain environmentally unfriendly for the foreseeable future. But that doesn’t mean we should cut it out altogether.

A greater degree of moderation and a drive to encourage less usage of environmentally inefficient activities is absolutely fine by me. I’m fully on board with initiatives such as those recently introduced by the French government to ban domestic flights on routes that their high speed trains can cover in under four hours.

But, some people (luckily mostly constrained to the fringes of internet forums) regularly argue that nobody should be allowed to fly even occasionally. That’s utter bullshit of course, and an hypocritical position to hold the moment you scratch them and examine their own life choices.

There’s no single activity undertaken by ordinary people that’s so devastatingly damaging to the environment that they should banned from doing. Reduce? Sure. Eliminate? No, not really.

So by all means, try to encourage or dissuade people by whichever carrot or stick economic initiatives from taking superfluous flights that could be achieved by land travel within a reasonable time frame. But screw any proclamations that people should refrain from ever taking even the odd leisure flight a couple of times per year. Ditto a total ban on anything else, from driving a motor vehicle to eating meat.
 
Back
Top Bottom