I don't think there's anything nefarious going on. Someone has taken a photo and done a half-arsed job of tidying it and made some shitty Photoshop blunders. The hand thing, I can do that and I'm 49.
It's cock-up, not conspiracy. If it was a conspiracy They wouldn't have left in GCSE level photoshop mistakes.
It just follows the conspiracy theory train of thought "X is an all-powerful organisation" also "X while being an all-powerful organisation leaves obvious mistakes for those who are not sheeple to see"
Definitely AI.This is the best I can do
View attachment 415505View attachment 415506View attachment 415507View attachment 415508
Definitely AI.
we have a whiteboard at work we ask users to write things on now and again. last week we asked them to name women who had inspired them, for international women's day. one of my colleagues put up kate middleton. it was a display of arslikhan i hope never to see the likes of again.I'm often surprised by the near veneration there is of Kate here in the UK. So many otherwise normal people are deeply invested in her life. Why? Apart from marrying well what has she actually done? My sisters and a niece are besotted by Kate.
kill on sight, it should have beenAmongst all the hilarity, which I find pretty boring tbh, the interesting thing surely is the "Kill notice". The kill notice that hasn't stopped every newspaper repeating the pic this morning.
That 'kill notice' isn't nothing. All is not well in the fantasy land of royalty.
Good. Fuck 'em.
Swum the channel.Apart from marrying well what has she actually done?
we have a whiteboard at work we ask users to write things on now and again. last week we asked them to name women who had inspired them, for international women's day. one of my colleagues put up kate middleton. it was a display of arslikhan i hope never to see the likes of again.
I once got into trouble for posting the pic of the sainted Kate in the see through dress she modelled as a student. I was reminded that she should be respected for who she is, “our future queen.”Swum the channel.
Fought ninjas who were trying to kill the queen.
Discovered the ancient city of Atlantis.
But she wore it yes?I once got into trouble for posting the pic of the sainted Kate in the see through dress she modelled as a student. I was reminded that she should be respected for who she is, “our future queen.”
I can do it easily without needing to touch my other hand or any other object. . . and I am far from a supple young lad wigglin' his hands all day.I can't do it without nearly dislocating my other fingers. Plus try doing it with index folded in?
First thing I thought of too, not any dodgy photoshop. There is no way she could be sitting comfortably in those jeans after major abdominal surgery. Although I guess they could be undone to give her colostomy bag some room...I can maybe forgive the shitty photoshop, but we're meant to believe that a woman had major abdominal surgery a few weeks ago then has a photo taken sitting down in skinny denim?
Absolute horseshit.
I can maybe forgive the shitty photoshop, but we're meant to believe that a woman had major abdominal surgery a few weeks ago then has a photo taken sitting down in skinny denim?
Absolute horseshit.
Yes she did, and yes she must have been.But she wore it yes?
Was she disrespectful to herself for wearing it?
Do you know something the rest of us don't?...Unless they've killed the kids and faked the picture to cover it up, this just isn't news.
Who fucking cares though? Why are people getting worked-up about it?
It's a picture of a woman and her children that might have been fucked about with a bit.
Unless they've killed the kids and faked the picture to cover it up, this just isn't news.