Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Filth by name. . .

to appease you i'll drop it till the police investigation find no fault on the behavior of the police involved


ta
good news, they've said no police vehicle - or any other vehicle - was near them at the time of the crash. And there's cctv. So you can drop it now 😎
 
I lost count of how many times people nearly rode into me on the pavement when I commuted in London. There absolutely needs to be more regulation.

TBF there is enough regulation, at least about their use - above a certain speed (IIRC 15 and a bit MPH) they are to be treated as motor cycles, with all that entails (licence, insurance, numberplate etc).

What is lacking is enforcement on the firms involved (in terms of the bikes capable of doing > 15mph), many of whom are at best described as dubious, and education of the public in the sense of these e-bikes generally. I am not sure they provide any social benefit and the risks from collisions and the batteries burning down peoples homes are way out of proportion to the benefits they bring, if indeed there are any.
 
Ahem. Police confirm the boys were being followed but the reason they weren't closer was the bollards


Did the police run them down with the van? No.

Did they contribute to the accident in some way? That answer could be Yes.
 
Last edited:
TBF there is enough regulation, at least about their use - above a certain speed (IIRC 15 and a bit MPH) they are to be treated as motor cycles, with all that entails (licence, insurance, numberplate etc).

What is lacking is enforcement on the firms involved (in terms of the bikes capable of doing > 15mph), many of whom are at best described as dubious, and education of the public in the sense of these e-bikes generally. I am not sure they provide any social benefit and the risks from collisions and the batteries burning down peoples homes are way out of proportion to the benefits they bring, if indeed there are any.
I helped my brother move a load of his stuff into a storage unit last year whilst he was mid house move. In the unit next to his was a young scouse lad building these bikes to order for two and a half grand. He had a website and orders for months in advance. A fair few of these bikes end up used in County Lines activity. Even here in sunny Wrexham you can have your 20 bag delivered to your nearest bus stop by a ballied up yoof on his Merseybike. Certainly more problematic that scooters.
 
I think that's debatable. The only thing stopping them from directly following the bike was the bollards/railings at the end of the road, so the police van appeared to have been going around the obstacles via the road route. The police have said they were following the bike a mere minute or two before the boys were killed.

The intent to chase/follow/pursue was there even if the physical proximity wasn't. It certainly appears from the CCTV so far that the police van was trying to intercept them further along the road, after the bollards. Allegedly.
 
Previous enquiries into the number of children strip searched revealed 99 had been carried out in 2021. The Met now indicate this number was inaccurate and the actual number is 271.

Commenting in response, Ms Russell said: “Almost a year after I asked for Met data on the strip searching of children, the Met cannot even provide the location of a fifth of those that took place.

“This data from 2021 had not been recorded properly, leading to almost a year of delay in answering my question on locations of strip searches and the correction of a previous answer, which now shows three times more children were being strip searched by police.

She added: “Each strip search means another child traumatised by an interaction with the Met.
 
I think that's debatable. The only thing stopping them from directly following the bike was the bollards/railings at the end of the road, so the police van appeared to have been going around the obstacles via the road route. The police have said they were following the bike a mere minute or two before the boys were killed.

The intent to chase/follow/pursue was there even if the physical proximity wasn't. It certainly appears from the CCTV so far that the police van was trying to intercept them further along the road, after the bollards. Allegedly.
Yeh cos they say the van was told of a road traffic incident - the boys crashing - at which point the van put the lights on and went to the crash site. But I find it very difficult to believe that in two minutes someone sees the crash, phones 999, talks to someone, who relays the details to a strangely conveniently located van. There's some bollocks going on there I think
 

You must be watching a different video. Try this one.


Screenshot 2023-05-25 10.23.35 AM.png

A witness, whose CCTV captured the police van in Frank Road, said she and their four-year-old niece had had to jump out of the way of the bike and van.

“You could see the boys were panicking and trying to get away from the police,” she said. “The boys were petrified.”


If you want to do semantics (following/chasing) that's up to you. The end result is the same. Two petrified kids ended up dead after being 'followed' (and, according to some, regularly harassed) by the police.

And I don't think this is a thread to talk about regulation of e-bikes. Start your own, those of you who would rather deflect attention away from more obvious police lies.

Oh and add in Harry Stanley, the man with 'a gun' in Hackney that turned out to be a table leg.
 
Yeh cos they say the van was told of a road traffic incident - the boys crashing - at which point the van put the lights on and went to the crash site. But I find it very difficult to believe that in two minutes someone sees the crash, phones 999, talks to someone, who relays the details to a strangely conveniently located van. There's some bollocks going on there I think
yup
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ax^
Woah, it's like being back in the Met
Police whistleblower says Bournemouth Police 'Force Support Group' nurtured a culture of 'racist, misogynistic and homophobic' behaviour.
 
Content warning for child sexual abuse.

.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

A former Met police officer has been jailed for sexually abusing a child under the age of 13 at a party.

Pc Farhan Ghadiali, of Woodford Green, Essex, attacked the girl while off duty in September 2019.


Chelmsford Crown Court heard this caused the victim, who was under the age of 13, ‘profound psychological issues’.


Kate Davey, prosecuting, stressed the girl had been ‘traumatised at every level’, ‘cries a lot, she’s very scared’ and has ‘self-harmed because of this’.

Farhan Ghadiali, aged 44, was suspended from duty in December 2020, after an investigation was launched by Essex Police. He was sacked earlier this month "after the panel considered the allegations proven to be gross misconduct."

Ghadiali was sentenced to 30 months and made the subject of an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order.

Ex-Met police officer jailed for sexually assaulting a child
 
Not sure if this should be in the Cat and kittens thread. British Transport Police Constable and partner jailed for fraud and breaches of Animal Welfare Act, after selling neglected and sick kittens and claiming to be a vet.
 
tbh whether it is classed as a chase, a pursuit, a chance encounter or simply keeping an eye on the boys is immaterial, from my pov the police played a clear and direct role in what happed shortly after the van was forced to detour
absolutely, there's no way that the police actions didn't contribute to the crash - as I said yesterday they might not have actually run them down in the van but CCTV clearly shows their actions a mere two minutes prior.

Whatever words were used - and it is just words and word games - police in that van are complicit in the deaths. Given the time that elapsed, how could they not be?
 
Back
Top Bottom