Limejuice
Well-Known Member
I have a long-standing concern over media companies owning the sport they televise.
They have an intrinsic bias to chase paying-audience metrics. It's called surrogation bias. It ignores measures such as "product quality", customer satisfaction and loyalty, reinvestment, and so on, to chase that one extra pair of eyeballs in Kuala Lumpur.
We only have to look at the clusterfuck that is American football. The telly people didn't even control the sport, but nevertheless were able to mess around with the laws of the game to benefit their income, and turn the game into something unwatchable.
I think Netflix does interesting documentaries, but it has no petrol in its soul. Those long, lingering shots of unidentifiable celebs infesting the team garages, most of whom seem to have a new film / album / perfume being released...?
They have an intrinsic bias to chase paying-audience metrics. It's called surrogation bias. It ignores measures such as "product quality", customer satisfaction and loyalty, reinvestment, and so on, to chase that one extra pair of eyeballs in Kuala Lumpur.
We only have to look at the clusterfuck that is American football. The telly people didn't even control the sport, but nevertheless were able to mess around with the laws of the game to benefit their income, and turn the game into something unwatchable.
I think Netflix does interesting documentaries, but it has no petrol in its soul. Those long, lingering shots of unidentifiable celebs infesting the team garages, most of whom seem to have a new film / album / perfume being released...?
Last edited: