what sources are you using?
I won't answer that.
Anyhow the Harrow one is on and some Nigerian Christian group is supporting it. Its seems like it is gonna be an ultra-christian do by the sounds of it.
what sources are you using?
A question
If Choudry and co can have the right to march then isn't it consistent that another group opposing Islamic Fundamentalism also have that right, leaving aside who the group may consist of, just the principle...
dates for future appearances?
Choudry's mob out in Lewisham on August 1st for their Islamic Road Show. They should be no platformed.
dates for future appearances?
Be cool.
Thirties blackshirts and fascist marches.
A wave of attacks on synagogue's in the 40's
Serious threats of the lynching of black people in Notting Hill in the 50's.
A wave of attacks on Asians and the left in the 70's.
The left is not as yet facing, as it did in the 70's, a British Movement, a group Searchlight estimated had 3,000 members at it's height, made up of mainly young white males, many recruited from the football terraces, led by a milkman. With many amongst it's ranks holding duel membership with the main fascist grouping of the time, the NF.
I suspect this EWDL/CU is a tempting vehicle by some for a new British Movement, whose targets this time will be any 'Muslim' and their 'left supporters'?
If so, I'm with those thinking time to nip this in the bud.
As for the BNP? They'll hope to make some gains from this and perhaps they will? It also may turn out to be a poisoned chalice?
Does The Left care that there is a difference between EDL/Casuals United, BNP, NF, C18, aryan martyrs brigade(!), BFF, WNP, BPP?? Seems like they are all "Nazis", do people think that this backfires? I mean the BNP are supposedly Nazi's but they got almost 1 million votes?
Arrogant, but true in it`s facts. If UAF had not mobilised the youth, the it would have been the result? As it was clear that, a few mistakes aside like the attack on the Trades council folk, only nazis were targetted by the youth. It wasnt as if innocent bystanders had got attacked or something as all of the reports indicate otherwise- this was multiracial groups against nazi youththe uaf's response to saturdays events is absolutely fearless in its arrogance.
"The UAF counter demonstration acted as an important focal point for the anger that many people in Birmingham, especially those from the Muslim community, rightly felt about the fact that a gang of thugs was being allowed to hold a racist march in the city centre. Our rally was noisy but peaceful. The trouble that arose took place after it had ended and was sparked by a group of racists who broke off from the EDL demonstration and marched towards the anti-fascist rally to goad protesters.
The blame for the violent scenes that ensued lies wholly with the racist football hooligans that came to Birmingham to intimidate and attack the Muslim community. The police should have heeded the many warnings from the local community that this group was intent on anti-Muslim provocation, instead of naively accepting EDL claims that they were "not racist" at face value".
http://www.uaf.org.uk/news.asp?choice=90808
"Nobody – least of all the police – should be taken in by the EDL's pretence that these marches and rallies are not aimed at whipping up race hatred against Muslims and Asians. They are racist demos and we should not allow them to take place. Unite Against Fascism was right to help organise opposition to the EDL and we will endeavour to do the same against any similar demonstration."
Arrogant, but true in it`s facts. If UAF had not mobilised the youth, the it would have been the result? As it was clear that, a few mistakes aside like the attack on the Trades council folk, only nazis were targetted by the youth. It wasnt as if innocent bystanders had got attacked or something as all of the reports indicate otherwise- this was multiracial groups against nazi youth
Arrogant, but true in it`s facts. If UAF had not mobilised the youth, the it would have been the result? As it was clear that, a few mistakes aside like the attack on the Trades council folk, only nazis were targetted by the youth. It wasnt as if innocent bystanders had got attacked or something as all of the reports indicate otherwise- this was multiracial groups against nazi youth
maybe read uaf's statement while watching the youtube footage of the young lad in green getting a kicking. A few mistakes aside indeed.
Oh what twaddle.Certainly if you take away the bnp's presense in this what you have is essentially the uaf defending islamic fundamentalism.
completely untrue mate, in its facts.
Ironically EDL in its statement admitting it fucked up, recognising its mistakes, almost apologetic in its failure to get over the fact they're not a racist group
Whether or not the uaf were involved the local lads were never going to stand for these racist twats taking the piss. The uaf are merely a sideshow.
UAF statement might as well be titled Full steam ahead into the trap.
I think you are over-estimating any bad publicity over this- none of the papers particualrly condemn the muslim community for defending itself
the fascist demo
So you're saying that anyone that sees an image of a white kid being kicked by an Asian kid is racist because they will automatically assume the white kid couldn't possibly deserve it?They don't have to, the photos/images will surely do the talking in many peoples minds
I think it is agreed that the man in green was one of the fascists and not an innocent bystander. The only report of innocents being targetted is the Trades Council people?
4 boneheads turned up, all looking the part. Took one look at the "Black and White Unite" banner of the EDL and left.