Ranbay
The same rules apply
He's on the politics show with the neil in a bit.
Best one yet, they called him out on loads of stuff for a change.
He's on the politics show with the neil in a bit.
Best one yet, they called him out on loads of stuff for a change.
How do people think Robinson handled it, imo, he did 'very well' and managed to get his points out, appear as a 'family man' , batted away questions on his past and only got flustered at points where he took a drink then got back on track, it wasn't Neils finest hour, I think TR is now getting some very good media training, I think he could move away from being a figure of satire.
How do people think Robinson handled it, imo, he did 'very well' and managed to get his points out, appear as a 'family man' , batted away questions on his past and only got flustered at points where he took a drink then got back on track, it wasn't Neils finest hour, I think TR is now getting some very good media training, I think he could move away from being a figure of satire.
I think I'd largely agree that he 'did well' with some pretty obvious, pre-prepared responses to the obvious questions that Neil would throw at him. Thought Neil's researchers left his accusations looking rather vague, and hence fairly easy for TR to rebuff. Neil also seemed a little clueless about how to engage with a pressure/political group with a claim of no formal membership list. Difficult to discern to what degree TR's media ability is down to training or raw intellect/nerve, but his nervous looking, off camera glances (to 'minders'?) and the reliance on the cup of coffee prop did give the (intended?) impression of the under-dog.
Most worryingly, I can imagine that my working class, UKIP voting father would have found alot of what he said attractive.
At least they backed up the claims, normally they say stuff and he's just lies his way around it. Was hoping they would show the "send the black cunts home" video or the nazi salutes ones from the other week.
treelover said:How do people think Robinson handled it, imo, he did 'very well' and managed to get his points out, appear as a 'family man' , batted away questions on his past and only got flustered at points where he took a drink then got back on track, it wasn't Neils finest hour, I think TR is now getting some very good media training, I think he could move away from being a figure of satire.
malatesta32 said:its NWI - infidels. a splinter group who are much more far right and hate tommy - cos tommy is on telly and they aint!
I imagine it's possibly to do with why the state quite likes A-to-B marches - legitimising an outlet for dissent that can then be controlled.He comes accross better than he used to, but it's still not hard to catch him out. I don't think most people believe the "we're not racist, honest" stuff and never have - the EDL won that reputation for themselves by acting consistently racist since they started. Racist chants at demos and nazi salutes don't help. The way they act makes people think they're just a re-run of the NF, and it's one of the reasons why they ended up declining because that sort of stuff alienates a lot of people who might otherwise support the anti-Islamic extremism stuff.
The more interesting question is to do with why is he getting all the publicity now? They're getting indulged massively, more than Griffin ever was and Griffin actually had a much more solid claim to be being entitled time on the BBC, on the back of his MEP status and the number of councillors the BNP had, than the EDL ever has.
I imagine it's possibly to do with why the state quite likes A-to-B marches - legitimising an outlet for dissent that can then be controlled.
Just had a long drawn out argument with an EDL member on Twitter. Asserts that he's not racist. Didn't really cover much but I suggested that we do a proper blog discussion at some point and he was up for it. Good idea?
Do you want to have a pointless argument with comment sections full of trolls? Fair enough, some people enjoy that sort of thing, but if you don't then no.Just had a long drawn out argument with an EDL member on Twitter. Asserts that he's not racist. Didn't really cover much but I suggested that we do a proper blog discussion at some point and he was up for it. Good idea?
Why would that be politically good? That would be the absolute worst thing surely - precisely because of what you go on to point out in your second paragraph.
As someone not involved, yes! If he/she is willing to engage in a debate, have it.
Reads a bit like a shitty hatchet job to me, with no real reply from UAF, though some of the criticisms are valid and have been voiced in this thread.
But they're doing that thing of lumping all anti-fascists together as the UAF, which is not ever the case, even if it's UAF-organised events people turn up for.
Reads a bit like a shitty hatchet job to me, with no real reply from UAF, though some of the criticisms are valid and have been voiced in this thread.
But they're doing that thing of lumping all anti-fascists together as the UAF, which is not ever the case, even if it's UAF-organised events people turn up for.
These 'strong' EDL fronts seem to be being treated differently by the police than the EDL itself is
No, I thought it was a typo of NWI at first. But if you look at that screenshot NWA is referred to a few times, and then there's a post by the "North West Alliance".