That's the name of itsays "first love foundation" lol
Oh, here we are. It's not an odd US one, it's a faith charity. Again with the religion.
http://www.charityjob.co.uk/RecruitersAZ/18246/First Love Foundation.aspx
On the subject of America, Fox News' Bill O'Reilly is having Tommy Robinson on his hour of hate on Thursday. I'm actually really interested to see how they will spin it.
cesare
I think for a lot of especially older people having the support of the community is a bit of a lifeline. There are a lot of old people who go to the local shul which ive been going to on and off (mostly off tbh ) for years who probably wouldnt get out much at all, dont have any family in the area, quite alot of of them are disabled, some of them escaped during the war etc and a lot of them would not have any social support were it not for the people they know there, and it's not even necessarily about religion. I know it's the same at Churches as well, they are full of old people and i'd imagine it is in mosques as well. I have my own issues with it but I think that unless they are deliberately exclusionary/preaching hate etc then i dont think there's all that much wrong. I also think that there's a difference between the religious side and the social side and many people just go to these things for the social side.
I think this type of stuff is the sort of stuff that "the left" for want of a better word used to be a lot better at, I know they are a lot better in places like Italy for it, chilango, Fedayn etc probably know more about that than I do!
Cheers for the heads up.
I'd have missed this interesting diversion as I don't keep much of an eye on EDL threads.
But yeah, bang on.
Churches (of whatever faith) do a lot of the stuff that a "rooted" Left would/should do.
I keep saying that the first thing the Left needs is the rebuilding of community and the ideas of solidarity, mutual aid etc. and this starts with mundane "apolitical" stuff like chatting to your neighbours over a cup of tea, street parties/communal pot luck meals/BBQs, child care/play activities etc.
Dog shit politics if you like.
Stuff that the LibDems, fash and Greens have all dabbled in with a measure of success.
Stuff that the IWCA tried.
Stuff that self-righteous lefties will dismiss.
Stuff that elsewhere, where the Left is (or at least has been) part of the w/c community they do. Autogestione innit?
Stuff that in most places in the UK is left to the church. The problem with hat not being their theism so much as that the community they build is not built around class.
There is a lot more that could and should be said I guess, but 8 a.m. On an EDL thread is probably not the time nor place.
We can help you choose which lookDotty says next I'll be getting a dog on a string ffs
We can help you choose which look
If we defend the right of preachers to stay we're in danger of assisting homophobia etc.
No, we're defending freedom of speech. Just because you don't like what they say doesn't mean they should be suppressed. You're letting them speak so they can be exposed as homophobic / racist /whatever. And maybe, just maybe, by open debate, they'll be persuaded of the wrongness of their views.
No, we're defending freedom of speech. Just because you don't like what they say doesn't mean they should be suppressed. You're letting them speak so they can be exposed as homophobic / racist /whatever. And maybe, just maybe, by open debate, they'll be persuaded of the wrongness of their views.
step, there is something quite lovely about a girl dressed like that. i heart this girl though!
I bet she hates that picture now, served her time and probably has nothing to do with radical politics now.
same as you, you mean.I bet she hates that picture now, served her time and probably has nothing to do with radical politics now.
There's a difference between defending freedom of speech and supporting what's being said, you know?
What about if people have to listen to that shit?
what would you do if a bunch of people were saying "quartz is a cunt and a terrorist and so are all his family and he should get out of the country" in a public place?
Don't judge others by your own standards.
That being factually false, legal action would swiftly follow. You are responsible for your speech. q.v. a certain recent case of someone being accused of being a paedophile. But if something is true, you should have the right to say it, no matter how distasteful others find it.
Quite true, and it's a nuance many don't get. But look at it this way: before you can decide to support something or not, first you have to hear of it.
Who's forcing you to listen?
That being factually false, legal action would swiftly follow. You are responsible for your speech. q.v. a certain recent case of someone being accused of being a paedophile. But if something is true, you should have the right to say it, no matter how distasteful others find it.