Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
The bloke’s a fuckwit. Every word of her judgement was pretty much spot on. As regards his witterings on the allegations, it’s all based on what he and Assange say, not on any indisputable evidence which is how he presents it. Typical conspiracy nonsense.I almost stopped reading after the second word - if this chap wants to be taken seriously & be considered impartial, writing judge in inverted commas is not a sensible way to start. He might as well have written "so called judge" whilst pouting with his tongue out...
And what does the fact that the judge's husband went to Eton have to do with the validity of her ruling? Could this bloke possibly be any more ad hominen? How about attacking the ruling, on the ruling's merits, rather than the person making it? Maybe she's a total posh cunt who deserves a good kicking, quite frankly I couldn't care less, I'm more interested in what she said & whether that stands up to scrutiny.
You’re right about putting judge and lady in inverted commas too. Straight out of the playground and drives a coach and horses through the credibility of everything that follows.
Last edited: