Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Driving Standards

It's perfectly legal to use a handheld phone when driving, whether in motion or stationary, as long you don't use an interactive communication function on it.
How do you figure that one out?
Breach of requirements as to control of vehicle, mobile telephones etc.
A person who contravenes or fails to comply with a construction and use requirement—

(a)as to not driving a motor vehicle in a position which does not give proper control or a full view of the road and traffic ahead, or not causing or permitting the driving of a motor vehicle by another person in such a position, or

(b)as to not driving or supervising the driving of a motor vehicle while using a hand-held mobile telephone or other hand-held interactive communication device, or not causing or permitting the driving of a motor vehicle by another person using such a telephone or other device,

is guilty of an offence.
It doesn't cease being an interactive communication device (or a telephone) just because you're currently doing something else on it.
 
It’s also currently legal to use it for interactive communications as long as it’s not in your hand .

Indeed and this age of hands free devices it does make you wonder why so many people still choose not to use them.
 
How do you figure that one out?
It doesn't cease being an interactive communication device (or a telephone) just because you're currently doing something else on it.

Case law:
 
Beyond telling the time what other usage does a phone have that is not considered an interactive communication?
How do you figure that one out?
It doesn't cease being an interactive communication device (or a telephone) just because you're currently doing something else on it.


Filming: Mobile loophole for filming drivers 'to be closed'
 
How do you figure that one out?
It doesn't cease being an interactive communication device (or a telephone) just because you're currently doing something else on it.
Platinumsage is right. It does (unless there's been a law change since July 2019). There are however, plenty of other things you could be done for (without due care and attention etc)

 
How do you figure that one out?
It doesn't cease being an interactive communication device (or a telephone) just because you're currently doing something else on it.
Platinumsage is right. It does (unless there's been a law change since July 2019). There are however, plenty of other things you could be done for (without due care and attention etc)


So using it as a camera or voice recorder doesn't count.
 
So a weird loophole which is being closed. OK.
There's nothing weird about it. The law was against making hand held telephone calls or texting. Using another function is doing neither of those things so the judgement was eminently sensible. If you want to stop all use of smartphone functions then make that the law, but don't start whining that the law isn't being correctly applied when it is.
 
Last edited:
There's nothing weird about it. The law was against making hand held telephone calls or texting. Using another function is doing neither of those things so the judgement was eminently sensible. If you want to stop all use of smartphones then make that the law, but don't start whining that the law isn't being correctly applied when it is.

What are you on about now? :D
 
What are you on about now? :D
Well it's not a loophole is it? It's just the law and it's the law being applied sensibly as opposed to it being interpreted incorrectly to suit a situation. It's pretty straightforward stuff. If you want to ban all smartphone usage then that's what the law needs to say, but you're heading down the route of making every other non-driving activity illegal too. Ban people for having a conversation while driving? Taking a swig of a drink? Changing radio channels or adjusting the volume? Even whilst the vehicle is at a standstill in motionless traffic and the engine's auto-stopped?
 
I know an Amazon driver that used to watch films when travelling to other Amazon depots on motorways.
 
Beyond telling the time what other usage does a phone have that is not considered an interactive communication?
:confused: Camera, stopwatch, photo library, voice recorder, music, torch, timer, calculator .... how many do you want?
 
Last edited:
And of course, satnav. But until very recently it was illegal to touch it even for just that function, but a TomTom was alright.
 
:confused: Camera, stopwatch, photo library, voice recorder, music, torch, timer, calculator .... how many do you want?
Don't forget television (or I suppose technically just a video playback device you don't receive "tele" video).
I was nearly run over by a driver who was watching something on their phone and didn't notice a fucking mini roundabout on the road they were driving on, and thus did not give way to me. Busy shopping street too with zebra crossings. I properly lost it when I caught up with them at traffic lights and saw the phone playing video.

I think there's been talk about creating a general "distracted driving" law which makes sense to me.
 

A hit-and-run driver had downed eight double vodkas in a pub shortly before he crashed his van into a heavily pregnant cyclist - causing devastating injuries which led to the loss of her unborn child.

Gary Marston is thought to have been using his mobile phone and travelling at an estimated speed of 54mph when he struck the rider from behind in Aylestone Road, Aylestone, Leicester in December last year.
 
Don't forget television (or I suppose technically just a video playback device you don't receive "tele" video).
I was nearly run over by a driver who was watching something on their phone and didn't notice a fucking mini roundabout on the road they were driving on, and thus did not give way to me. Busy shopping street too with zebra crossings. I properly lost it when I caught up with them at traffic lights and saw the phone playing video.

I think there's been talk about creating a general "distracted driving" law which makes sense to me.

Well there’s this but they didn’t bother updating it for televisions that aren’t cathode ray tubes, although courts have interpreted rather generously:

 
Asleep at the wheel :eek: (sorry if posted elsewhere). Both driver and passenger flat on their backs sleeping while their tesla was doing 90mph. So many issues with this
BBC News - Canada Tesla driver charged over 'napping while speeding'

The ante is always being upped.

Kids party in a Tesla drinking alcohol whilst it’s driving down the motorway in autopilot.


Cool Tik Tok video tho bro :facepalm:
 
Back
Top Bottom