ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Good point.'Adapting', I think, would be a better verb.
I was going to say "hybridising", but thought it sounded a bit too "sociology 'A' level" .
Good point.'Adapting', I think, would be a better verb.
I think it's enough that they've identified themselves as the enemy.Well perhaps given what BA has posted, those who have said it doesn't matter could explain, with some evidence perhaps, why it doesn't matter?!
Being proud of being working class is one of the stupidest ideas imaginable. We, as a class, are defined by by being exploited, by being dispossesed and having no control over what we do for a living. What kind of dimwit takes pride in that? What is there to be proud about in being working class?
They're nowhere near being synonymous, though, especially as the caste system is almost entirely static, it leaves very little room for what, in a class system, might be labelled "social mobility".
That description could be applied to some of the aristocracy!we wore hand-me-downs, had a carpet that was worn through, ate the cheapest food mr sainsbury had to offer, and had rotting mattresses in the garden.
This perception causes some Americans to say 'there's no class system in America'. But there is. Culturally and economically. Try getting into a New England club, and fitting in, if you're 'trailer trash'. There very much are cultural/social mores. But the salient point is wealth and power.I may have misunderstood, but you seem to be judging class entirely by an individuals wealth, as I understand it the "class system", which I see as being more of a hereditory system, is more like the caste system of India as it now exists.
I disagree. I'd say it's more of an obvious (and therefore more remarked upon) phenomenon in the UK, but is just as prevalent (although sometimes partially hidden within other forms of social categorisation and relations) anywhere that capitalism holds sway.
If I was Ma Bluestreak I'd give you a clip round the ear and tell you not to be so cheeky.
There was some tedious programme on a while ago with Prescott going on about class. This bunch of inner city council estate teenage girls seemed confused by the question 'what class are you?' One said she was middle-class and couldn't be working class "because I haven't got a job".
I'd say it's probably just that in the UK economic "class" is more closely tied up with cultural "class" than it is in other countries.
An interesting thing about Britain is that someone's accent can give away a lot about their class (and other things). I get the impression that in, say, the US, this is not so much the case (although this may just be that I am not so sensitive to US accent variations so don't pick up what others might).
I mean, just by speaking to an American you might get an idea of how articulate and maybe educated they are, but talking to a Brit, you can often tell what class they grew up in. As in, a well educated, articulate working class background Brit will sound very different to a well educated articulate upper class background Brit. I'm not sure to what extent you could say the same for the states, or other European countries.
This is how people think. Class consciousness is learned, not automatic.
No, accent definitely has a social meaning in the US, just like it does here.
No, accent definitely has a social meaning in the US, just like it does here.
This is how people think. Class consciousness is learned, not automatic.
Maybe simply more cleverly disguised by the smokescreen of a certain economic classes definition of cultural class charicteristics.
The caste system in India is a similar smokescreen - a legitimisation of presently existing economic class relations through the eyes of a feudal style idea of inevitability and natural order.
Both are lies.
I'm not andy cap or fat slag or a 'chav' although I may have a bit of all of them in my cultural being. I am working class though.
(I suppose my spelling is classic working class though... )
There is, though, occlusion and confusion in the UK, much of it deliberate, to muddy the picture. That way people think it's only about accent, or whether or not they eat avocados. So of course they'll say that doesn't matter. If it were only that, I'd agree with them - why would it matter? But that isn't what its about. It's about where wealth and power is concentrated. (The cultural capital behind that is where the cultural side of the picture gets interesting).I'd say it's probably just that in the UK economic "class" is more closely tied up with cultural "class" than it is in other countries.
Yup. That's the kind of thing my New England cub/ trailer trash example was aimed at.No, accent definitely has a social meaning in the US, just like it does here.
This perception causes some Americans to say 'there's no class system in America'. But there is. Culturally and economically. Try getting into a New England club, and fitting in, if you're 'trailer trash'. There very much are cultural/social mores. But the salient point is wealth and power.
Culture is part of the picture. Of course it is. There was the recent story about the hilarious faux pas the mother of the girlfriend of one of the Princes caused recently. (Was it Kate Middleton's mother?) I can't remember exactly what she got 'wrong', but she showed herself up by saying lavatory instead of toilet, or something. And something about tomatoes.However try getting into a New England club as "trailer trash" who's just won the lottery, chances are you wont, it's not just wealth.
Why do you use the term "smokescreen"? Do you mean that members of one class will deliberately adopt the cultural habits of another in an attempt to pretend that they are not the (economic) class they are? And that they will do this more in the UK than other countries?
However try getting into a New England club as "trailer trash" who's just won the lottery, chances are you wont, it's not just wealth.
Yes it's very old-fashioned.We're told it's "old fashioned" to think it does. But does it?
Why? And what's your come-back on this?Yes it's very old-fashioned.