Sorry, I momentarily forgot about your inability to think.
Who do you mean by the establishment? And how do they control Private Eye?Both stories were covered up because they were embarrasing for the establishment. Private eye ignored the stories Scallywag published them.
You didn't read that article by Simon Regan that I posted did you!Who do you mean by the establishment? And how do they control Private Eye?
When it decided to go "commercial," shortly before Richard Ingrams left, it was on the insistence of WH Smith and John Menzies that every issue must be read by their own libel lawyers - who never let anything through which could ever be slightly contentious. So, in effect, Private Eye became "tame".
No, I have a limited span on this Earth and better things to do with several weeks of itYou didn't read that article by Simon Regan that I posted did you!
surprised me the other day in a rare interview with hislop - openly admitted that he was a tory.
Same claim was made about Kincora, which turned out to actually be more of a Prod "old boy network" thing than a conspiracy to cover up the involvement of "top politicians".So you are saying that 'top' politicians were involved in such paedophilia?? Interesting.
1 Fuck all really? I thought you said you had never read it?
One half remembered story ?? So the Kincora boys home scandal and Portillo lilley are just half a remember story? It finished publishing years ago and no i dont remember all the stories but seeing as you cant even remember the stuff from this thread today please be gentle with me......
And as for your pathetic slimey little comment that i have refused to say whether i believe it or not.......Where belboid where?
Your conclusion that i have never read it and i am a sad little man is great coming from a political giant like yourself.......
"Scallywag" didn't break the Kincora story. It had been "out in the wild" for over 15 years before "Scallywag" picked it up, you tart.
Where to start eh? Neither i or Scallywag claimed they had broken the story.
But what they did was highlight a particular part of the scandal and publish it when others were probably too scared.
As for me being a Tart!!!! I try my best.
Why would any media outlet be "too scared" to re-publish a story that had passed without a writ way back in the mid and late 1970s, balders? All "Scallywag" ever wrote on Kincora was their take on events, pushing a line ("top politicians" being involved) that was also aired back in the mid and late 1970s.
No, them all being Oxbridge ex-public schoolboys does.But that hardly makes it 'establishment'
I'm very old. I still think of it like this.And it was even more oxbridge before Hislop
Surely all papers are owned by "establishment" interests though, unless you restrict your reading to badly photocopied anarchist newsletters handed out on street corners by bored looking youth and slightly suspicious looking beardy menNo, them all being Oxbridge ex-public schoolboys does.
many of their contributors have never been anywhere near oxbridge tho.
Well, some of them anyway.
And it was even more oxbridge before Hislop, yet had a much more anti-establishment image
Yes.Surely all papers are owned by "establishment" interests though
What a cretin.
I'm very old. I still think of it like this.
Funny as Hislop is on HIGNFY, I have trouble seeing the CofE-loving, Baden-Powell admiring posho as anything other than deeply reactionary.It's dropped the homophobia now. Most of it anyway...
aah, you're ignoring the previous post I see. i wonder why.
Is it because you'd have to admit that you never even read Scallywag, which is why you can hardly remember anything about it?
and for those of us with the ability to read critically,.
Funny as Hislop is on HIGNFY, I have trouble seeing the CofE-loving, Baden-Powell admiring posho as anything other than deeply reactionary.
Oooooh belboid you are so clever.......Go on give us some more of your awe inspiring analysis of the establishment.......