Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do you read Private Eye?

Do you read Private Eye?

  • Yes, I do.

    Votes: 52 35.1%
  • No, I don't.

    Votes: 32 21.6%
  • Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't.

    Votes: 60 40.5%
  • I'm cancelling my subscription. Yours, Norfolk Enchance.

    Votes: 4 2.7%

  • Total voters
    148
Who do you mean by the establishment? And how do they control Private Eye?
You didn't read that article by Simon Regan that I posted did you!
When it decided to go "commercial," shortly before Richard Ingrams left, it was on the insistence of WH Smith and John Menzies that every issue must be read by their own libel lawyers - who never let anything through which could ever be slightly contentious. So, in effect, Private Eye became "tame".
 
So you are saying that 'top' politicians were involved in such paedophilia?? Interesting.
Same claim was made about Kincora, which turned out to actually be more of a Prod "old boy network" thing than a conspiracy to cover up the involvement of "top politicians".
 
1 Fuck all really? I thought you said you had never read it?
One half remembered story ?? So the Kincora boys home scandal and Portillo lilley are just half a remember story? It finished publishing years ago and no i dont remember all the stories but seeing as you cant even remember the stuff from this thread today please be gentle with me......

And as for your pathetic slimey little comment that i have refused to say whether i believe it or not.......Where belboid where?

Your conclusion that i have never read it and i am a sad little man is great coming from a political giant like yourself.......

"Scallywag" didn't break the Kincora story. It had been "out in the wild" for over 15 years before "Scallywag" picked it up, you tart. Colin Wallace (who worked for British army intelligence at Lisburn Barracks) broke it, in the mid 1970s, to (IIRC) an Ulster daily paper, as well, a few years later, as Robin Ramsay's "Lobster" and to Paul Foot.
Interestingly, one of Wallace's concerns (besides the fact that the RUC were ignoring child molesting because it involved felloe Prods) was that a criminal situation that involved some Proddie paramilitary groups and assorted sash-wearers was being considered by British intelligence as a mechanism through which to smear Ulster politicians who didn't tow the British line. Fling enough mud and it will stick, whether you're innocent or not.
 
"Scallywag" didn't break the Kincora story. It had been "out in the wild" for over 15 years before "Scallywag" picked it up, you tart.

Where to start eh? Neither i or Scallywag claimed they had broken the story.
But what they did was highlight a particular part of the scandal and publish it when others were probably too scared.
As for me being a Tart!!!! I try my best.
 
Every fortnight, have a subscription. Certainly gives a different perspective than mainstream media, seems much more realistic although some would probably say pessimistic.
 
Where to start eh? Neither i or Scallywag claimed they had broken the story.
But what they did was highlight a particular part of the scandal and publish it when others were probably too scared.
As for me being a Tart!!!! I try my best.

Why would any media outlet be "too scared" to re-publish a story that had passed without a writ way back in the mid and late 1970s, balders? All "Scallywag" ever wrote on Kincora was their take on events, pushing a line ("top politicians" being involved) that was also aired back in the mid and late 1970s.
 
Why would any media outlet be "too scared" to re-publish a story that had passed without a writ way back in the mid and late 1970s, balders? All "Scallywag" ever wrote on Kincora was their take on events, pushing a line ("top politicians" being involved) that was also aired back in the mid and late 1970s.

I think they were more specific about who though. At least thats how i remember it.
Did you read the articles in Scallywag? I dont remember reading anywhere else the link between procuring kids from kincora and the treasurer of the Tory party, Did you read it somewhere else?
 
people claimed all sorts were involved in Kincora, including Heath and Mountbatten! They are rather lacking in supporting evidence tho. Did Scallywag provide any? preferably of a better quality than their evidence for Diana being murdered.

I don't know, I never read it (from what I know of it it had an incredibly scattergun approach that would usually mean it came out with a lot of shite, and a few good hits), but you haven't done a very good job at defending it, or showing why it did anything really worthwhile.

It is true that PE is far less likely to publish some of the stories they would have in the past, fear of libel has weakened it to an extent. But that hardly makes it 'establishment'
 
many of their contributors have never been anywhere near oxbridge tho.

Well, some of them anyway.

And it was even more oxbridge before Hislop, yet had a much more anti-establishment image
 
No, them all being Oxbridge ex-public schoolboys does.
Surely all papers are owned by "establishment" interests though, unless you restrict your reading to badly photocopied anarchist newsletters handed out on street corners by bored looking youth and slightly suspicious looking beardy men ;)
 
These last two series of HIGNFY have been good for showing just what a reactionary prick he is. Fortunately that doesn't stop the magazine from publishing a lot of good stuff - and for those of us with the ability to read critically, it's quite easy to spot the bollocks and the bullshit that's there too.
 
I love the fact that I good friend of mines mum met her 2nd husband through the personal ads in Private Eye. :)
 
aah, you're ignoring the previous post I see. i wonder why.

Is it because you'd have to admit that you never even read Scallywag, which is why you can hardly remember anything about it?

You are such a clown.
I read every copy of Scallywag you said you read none.... Yet you feel qualified to tell me that i never read Scallywag on what basis?
 
Oooooh belboid you are so clever.......Go on give us some more of your awe inspiring analysis of the establishment.......

as soon as you respond to any of the actual points raised with anything other than pathetic personal insults.

i wont be holding my breath,
 
Back
Top Bottom