Saul Goodman
It's all good, man
They have enough time on their hands to work out who the worst offenders are.which factories do you propose they picket?
They have enough time on their hands to work out who the worst offenders are.which factories do you propose they picket?
They're welcome.No, they've clearly seen the error of their ways after reading the well argued posts of Saul Goodman and others.
Any political action that stands a chance of actually doing something will annoy people on the way to work. It's inevitable.
The worst offenders at... not insulating the existing housing stock of the UK? Well, they could picket my workplace I suppose, we don't do any of that at all.They have enough time on their hands to work out who the worst offenders are.
Worst polluters.The worst offenders at... not insulating the existing housing stock of the UK? Well, they could picket my workplace I suppose, we don't do any of that at all.
They aren't demanding less pollution though, they're demanding the government insulate the housing stock of the country?Worst polluters.
Then by your reasoning, they should organise loft sit-ins, which I'm fine with.They aren't demanding less pollution though, they're demanding the government insulate the housing stock of the country?
They aren't demanding less pollution though, they're demanding the government insulate the housing stock of the country?
They don't have to achieve those demands to achieve something though do they? If insulating the housing stock of the UK is pushed up the political agenda - and it's certainly something a lot more people are aware of now - then they've achieved something. a lot more than they'd have been able to achieve by going and waving some placards outside downing street.
sounds like just the kind of action that will get your campaign on the evening news bulletins.Then by your reasoning, they should organise loft sit-ins, which I'm fine with.
Yes, because nobody has ever heard of loft insulation. We need to make people aware of its existence!sounds like just the kind of action that will get your campaign on the evening news bulletins.
Bit early to make strong claims about what will happen to private cars, I have no prediction just yet. Also your particular claim is dependent on when the lifetimes you mention actually end.Their demands are totally unrealistic, and could never be achieved in the time frame they set out, they live in the same fantasy world as all the numbnuts calling on private cars being banned, which is never going to happen in our lifetimes.
Bit early to make strong claims about what will happen to private cars, I have no prediction just yet. Also your particular claim is dependent on when the lifetimes you mention actually end.
Sounds like you've got entirely the wrong impression about this century and the magnitude of the transition that looks likely.The lifetime of those posting on here.
If anyone seriously thinks a government is going to ban private cars in the next 30-50 years at least, they need medical help.
One is tempted to wonder what they would have achieved in terms of awareness and support by buying a load of twitter and Facebook adverts...
They are pushing at an open door - I can make your house warmer, and cost you less in heating bills - and it's not really as if there's a huge cohort of the electorate unaware of climate change.
They aren't pushing something that no one has heard of, they are simply pushing for a fairly technical change that will inconvenience no one - it might be expensive and pain to do - but that is broadly in line with wide(ish) public opinion.
Well, it was until they started this idiocy...
They are pushing at an open door, I agree - but I don't think insulation has been a very substantial part of this debate until now. I think most people have been kind of resigned to having shitly insulated houses, as the means to sort it out is beyond them. It is now. And it's not something that people are going to be against just because of the way it's been brought to their attention - it's one of those rare things, a proposal about combating climate change which would also benefit them: it's not saying drive less, don't fly places, give things up - it's saying pay less in bills and have a warmer home.One is tempted to wonder what they would have achieved in terms of awareness and support by buying a load of twitter and Facebook adverts...
They are pushing at an open door - I can make your house warmer, and cost you less in heating bills - and it's not really as if there's a huge cohort of the electorate unaware of climate change.
They aren't pushing something that no one has heard of, they are simply pushing for a fairly technical change that will inconvenience no one - it might be expensive and pain to do - but that is broadly in line with wide(ish) public opinion.
Well, it was until they started this idiocy...
I don't think you thinkYou’re not arguing with me, you’re arguing with what you think I think.
Yeh a pig-headed refusal to face the facts, as I saidAre you two even talking about the same thing? He was just saying we shouldn't give in to abject defeatism wasn't he?
Sounds like you've got entirely the wrong impression about this century and the magnitude of the transition that looks likely.
This is not the same as me making a confident claim about when such a ban would be sure to happen. But I am loudly suggesting that to demonstrate such certainty about what will be normal in 30-50 years is incredibly stupid.
Um. Wasn't there a great push to diesel not that long ago, encouraged by the government? So there is a precedent for them doing er a u-turnAnd, I would suggest anyone that thinks a government that pushes people to electric vehicles over the next 10-25 years, will then ban those a few years later, are incredibly fucking stupid.
Um. Wasn't there a great push to diesel not that long ago, encouraged by the government? So there is a precedent for them doing er a u-turn
Oh I dont know, there have been subsidised insulation programmes on occasions in this country this century and work was done on some of the houses I can see out of my window as a result (external cladding).They are pushing at an open door, I agree - but I don't think insulation has been a very substantial part of this debate until now. I think most people have been kind of resigned to having shitly insulated houses, as the means to sort it out is beyond them. It is now. And it's not something that people are going to be against just because of the way it's been brought to their attention - it's one of those rare things, a proposal about combating climate change which would also benefit them: it's not saying drive less, don't fly places, give things up - it's saying pay less in bills and have a warmer home.
They will continue to push whatever creates more revenue. When (if?) the next generation of batteries is invented, cars using the current (no pun) batteries will be taxed into oblivion, just to sell more cars.Um. Wasn't there a great push to diesel not that long ago, encouraged by the government? So there is a precedent for them doing er a u-turn
Yeh a pig-headed refusal to face the facts, as I said
And, I would suggest anyone that thinks a government that pushes people to electric vehicles over the next 10-25 years, will then ban those a few years later, are incredibly fucking stupid.
Insulating the housing stock sounds like the sort of policy that all mainstream political parties should be advocating for.
I fully expect that it will be pinched by the Tories, Johnson to be featured in a “hilarious” photo call attempting to roll out a bundle of loft insulation and falling through the ceiling plaster. The implementation will then be farmed out to Dido Harding and a bloke Kwasi Kwarteng played The Wall Game with at Eton and naturally be a total disaster.