Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do potatoes count as a vegetable (for nutritional purposes)?

Do potatoes count as a vegetable for nutritional purposes?


  • Total voters
    47
They are a vegetable.

Though personally I would make Colcannon for it is truly the food of the Gods.

300px-Colcannon_recipe.jpg
 
ah interesting, regarding the fiber. Don't diss the potato! It's good for you!

In terms of nutrition, the potato is best known for its carbohydrate content (approximately 26 grams in a medium potato). The predominant form of this carbohydrate is starch. A small but significant portion of this starch is resistant to digestion by enzymes in the stomach and small intestine, and so reaches the large intestine essentially intact.

This resistant starch is considered to have similar physiological effects and health benefits as fiber: It provides bulk, offers protection against colon cancer, improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, lowers plasma cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, increases satiety, and possibly even reduces fat storage.

The amount of resistant starch in potatoes depends much on preparation methods. Cooking and then cooling potatoes significantly increased resistant starch. For example, cooked potato starch contains about 7% resistant starch, which increases to about 13% upon cooling.

wikipedia

Also I take advice from 'nutritionists' with a pinch of salt, a lot of them are faddists.
 
Even if spuds were nutritionally classed as a vegetable, sausage and a vegetable is not a nutritionally balanced meal

Yeah, this is rather the point. Talking about it being "classed" as a vegetable somehow implies that so long as you put the right label on it, you don't have to worry about the whole issue any more. The fact is that we need a balanced diet that includes a number of different things that will come from various elements of the "vegetable" class. Calling potatoes a vegetable won't mean that they suddenly have the things that green leafy veg has, for example.
 
so don't contribute to it then!

I prefer to advocate the more sensible version - 8-13 portions from a minimum of five different fruit and veg groups (incl nuts and seeds). Even the US deems its citizens capable of understanding that.

Now all they need to do is to define a "portion" Still a way to go there! :D
 
they do count, but they tell you they don't to stop the proles loading up on chips.
TRUTH.

as if there is just this ONE evil vegetable out of al the vegetables and fruit on the planet that isn't actually any good for you at all.

this is how those weird religious things about not eating certain foods start i bet.
 
Additional bonus question: If potatoes don't 'count', what about parsnips? They're quite carb-y, aren't they? Would sausage and parsnip be ok? :confused:
 
I recently heard a television interview of a fairly old very famous news reporter. Sorry I have forgotten her name. On being asked what she had thought of Reagan she said "horrible right-winger who said that ketchup counted as a vegetable in school dinners."

I always like to have a green vegetable on my plate. That will be broccoli or savoy cabbage for preference and strength of flavour - especially with bangers and mash. Onion gravy won't go amiss on sausages either. Also a tomato sliced in half and sizzled in the pan cut side down for not very long. I cook by colour. The tomato adds a dash of red to the plate and is the complementary colour to the green of the cabbage. Yellow mustard on the sausages is good and is a vegetable under the Ronald Reagan system.

Edited to add: a 'portion' in America where the whole 5 portions a day thing was invented by a large vegetable retailing company, is half a cup.
 
All vegetables are well carby. What you mean is that potatoes are starchy. As opposed to sugary, like a carrot.
 
No - don't understand, sorry :confused:
I reckon:
- sausage + potato = not nutritionally balanced
- sausage + proper veg (eg. carrots, kale, peas, broccoli, etc) = nutritionally balanced
You disagree with the latter?

You said sausage and mash or sausage and a vegetable (implying two items), sausage and one type of veg would not be nutritionally balanced no.
 
I think potatoes are often discounted when it comes to nutritional value.

Potato Council said:
Independent nutritionists and dietary researchers recommend potatoes as the perfect base for a balanced diet. Because potatoes are packed full of nutrients for your brain and body, they can make you look, feel and even think great!

Potato Nutrition

They can be good for you as part of a balanced diet.

Oh, I don't think Bangers and Mash would constitute a balanced healthy meal (on its own) :D
 
Well, no, I suppose not. Lettuce is pretty much water. Also see cucumber.

You Philistine, lettuces have lots of vitamin C in them and are as good as cabbage. I agree about cucumber, that is just cellulose and water and apparently has no food value at all. Water is of course a useful substance to take in though but lettuce will not supply it in much quantity.

Lettuce can be cooked and when it was first introduced that is how it was eaten.
 
Potatoes also have tonnes of vitamin C. Because you eat a lot of them at once, you're likely to get more vitamin C from potatoes than anywhere else.

Which would admittedly be more useful if we didn't all already overdose on vitamin C anyway, but there you go.
 
You Philistine, lettuces have lots of vitamin C in them and are as good as cabbage. I agree about cucumber, that is just cellulose and water and apparently has no food value at all. Water is of course a useful substance to take in though but lettuce will not supply it in much quantity.

Lettuce can be cooked and when it was first introduced that is how it was eaten.
Well, see above about vitamin C.

I thought lettuce and cabbage were good because of the various enzymes they contained, plus the roughage. Good nutrition is about a lot more than just the labelled vitamins, after all.
 
People who draw a distinction between vegetables and carbs make me laugh though.

Why? I find it a useful rule of thumb. Doesn't mean I think things really are that simple, of course, but I do think that a meal consisting of sausage + potato needs some veg adding to it. Ditto other carbs (pasta, rice etc): I always ask, 'where's the veg?'.
 
Weightwatchers give points for potatoes but not for most other veg btw. Probably using the same rationale as for 8115's mum.
 
Back
Top Bottom