Fedayn
Well-Known Member
I think it would be very hard to prove any politician used their family for political gain, when it seems it is the media (society?), rather than the politicians who dictate that a political leader needs to be a 'family' man.
If Cameron was the only politician to 'use' the media, then fair point, but he isn't. The fact his son had an illness, can hardly be seen as seeking advantage can it? The reverse would be to have 'hidden' his son away somewhere. It's hardly on a media spinning par with wearing a baseball cap at carnival is it..?
No-one said he used his childs illness anywhere here. His webCameron youtube broadcast included his children, it was pretty well directed and there's no other reason to include them, other than show him being the family man etc etc.. Neither did anyone say he was the only politician to 'use his family, they nearly all do it. That's not the issue here.