That would kill innovation and discourage kit sponsorship. Competitors' income would be reduced, giving an even bigger advantage to squads which have state funding.
Meh. Much of the advantage of state fundings come from the spending power in R&D.
That would kill innovation and discourage kit sponsorship. Competitors' income would be reduced, giving an even bigger advantage to squads which have state funding.
Just read his wiki page. Sad story.
Worth reading his book. Not an easy or settling read tho...
I think velodromes and coaches and athletes not needing a day job makes rather more of a difference than a tiny improvement in the aerodynamics of the kit.Meh. Much of the advantage of state fundings come from the spending power in R&D.
I think velodromes and coaches and athletes not needing a day job makes rather more of a difference than a tiny improvement in the aerodynamics of the kit.
At the risk of getting involved in argument that has nothing to do with me, the velodrome is largely a commonwealth dominion. The French (for example) have a strong history in sprinting, but they don't have a full track program to the same extent as for eg GB, Aus etc. Gather things may be changing, but road has always been the main focus.
That may well be true - however the (flawed) assertion is 'big track programme = big medal haul' in the rest of the world- hasn't happened. The original point is who is a threat to GB at this Olympics....the answer is nobody, but I don't see Aus running them a close second across the board (as may be said of the Track Worlds and Cup).
The film is also not bad, but the book is better. I'll lend it to you if you want!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...n-the-bath-and-made-from-an-old-saucepan.html
Not that sad. He held the hour record, seems to have overcome some of his demons and is much more OK with himself these days.
He's a total hero.
My stepping in was less to support the assertion that it would only be Aus and GB winning medals, and more that they are the two (in particular) who focus on the track.
Thats valid, but its a not what the argument was about!
The film is also not bad, but the book is better. I'll lend it to you if you want!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...n-the-bath-and-made-from-an-old-saucepan.html
The film, and the mid 90s documentary are his rivalry with Boardman aren't a patch on the book. Flying Scotsman is a jaw dropping read, the film sanitised the story and took all the edges off. He was of course totally stitched up by the UCI in the end when his superman position was adopted en masse by the top pursuiters...then banned. His achievement in cycling is like Dagenham and Redbridge winning the champions league.
No doubt. Although the Australians are having a bit of a mare all round these Olympics.
The ignominy of their gold medal count has been too much - so the Aussies have invented the rogue nation of "Aus Zealand".
For the first time since the 1912 Olympics in Stockholm, where the trans-Tasman rivals joined forces as Australasia, the countries are united again - at least according to Sydney's Daily Telegraph newspaper.
Jason Kenny into the sprint final with Bauge, should be an exciting one.
Kenny will take it easily. I will get annoyed. Until I remember that Bauge served a ban for three failed whereabout-a-ma-bobs.
Did the commentator just say that the leading woman was competing with 'the whore of Belgium'??!!
Did he? I don't know much about him but he looks like a bit of a beast, I get the impression he was always going to be Kenny's nearest competitor
Yeah. One of those cases that dragged out for months through CAS. Was stripped of a WC as a result.
Funnily enough, I think it's because of him that Kenny got the nod ahead of Hoy.