This thread speculating on the government's strategy is interesting (it is speculation, but looks like he's got it about right to me)
I cannot believe the UK government is saying they're fine with potentially half a million people dying. What utter scum.
This thread speculating on the government's strategy is interesting (it is speculation, but looks like he's got it about right to me)
Aren’t there quite a few diseases that you only have once and after that have an immunity to? Like chicken pox (though I’m aware that a few people do get it again)Has there ever been a virus where herd immunity has naturally occurred to remove the threat without there being a vaccine? Surely it only works with vaccination?
This thread speculating on the government's strategy is interesting (it is speculation, but looks like he's got it about right to me)
Yes but chicken pox is still around. Herd immunity has not worked for that.Aren’t there quite a few diseases that you only have once and after that have an immunity to? Like chicken pox (though I’m aware that a few people do get it again)
seizing on the pandemic as an opportunity to crash the NHS disruptor styleThe whole approach seems strange to me - I'd have thought you'd want as few people to get it as possible so as not to overload the NHS, until a vaccine/treatment is developed.
I'm in a neighbourhood/ward mutual aid group, and the Newcastle one. Both are less than than 10 hours old! At the moment the focus is on leafleting local houses and flats/contacting through social media people in the area who may want to join or think they may need help at some point. Labour party councillors are in the neighbourhood group. There is a call-out is for donations to a local foodbank - and community centres which get food donations to give away are encouraging people to ask neighbours if they want items picked up. More organised preparations could happen, or individuals may ask for help with shopping now (even if they are not symptomatic or officially isolating) - but we have only been going for a few hours, so its up to whats needed/what people feel they can do.These mutual aid groups look promising, not just the usual suspects, shop owners, self employed, all sorts really
however, they seem focused on when vunerable people are self isolating, not preparing, stock piling, etc
local labour parties don't seem to be doing anything.
Has there ever been a virus where herd immunity has naturally occurred to remove the threat without there being a vaccine? Surely it only works with vaccination?
Yes but chicken pox is still around. Herd immunity has not worked for that.
Here you gopaywall can you c&p?
Police will be able to detain infected people and schools could be forced to stay open under a package of powers being announced next week to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Emergency laws to help to limit the spread of the virus will be introduced after the number of people infected in Britain rose by 200 in 24 hours to 798. The measures, seen by The Times, will also let councils lower standards in care homes to deal with staff shortages.
The legislation, which ministers intend to push through parliament in two weeks, will equip the government to deal with the disease. Ministers believe that the virus will infect the majority of the population, and the laws will stay in place for two years.
The government will be given the power to halt “any vehicle, train, vessel or aircraft”. Ministers will be able to close ports if there are “insufficient resources” to retain border security through customs and immigration officers falling sick.
There are further measures to speed up cremations and burials. “In a reasonable worst-case scenario the death management industry will be rapidly overwhelmed,” the government said in a draft. “There is a significant gap in body storage requirements to ensure we are prepared for the reasonable worst-case scenario.”
Next week Boris Johnson will follow Scotland and Ireland by banning gatherings of more than 500 people, including football matches, concerts and festivals.
The move came less than 24 hours after the prime minister rejected the proposals. They are designed to reduce pressure on the health service and the police as the pandemic reaches its peak, rather than to slow Covid-19’s spread.
The emergency laws will enable police and immigration officers to detain people “for a limited period” if there are concerns that they could be infected. The government will have the power to direct schools and nurseries to stay open if they are closed unnecessarily by teachers and staff and to close them as the pandemic peaks. The care given to the elderly could also be stripped back. Local authorities will be able to offer reduced levels of care to people in their homes or in care homes as long as it does not lead to “serious neglect or harm”.
It could mean that people receive support with washing and cooking once a day rather than twice. The move is intended to protect local authorities from legal challenge for failing to fulfil their statutory duties.
The government stopped short of banning care home visitors despite concerns that there could be high fatality levels if elderly people caught the virus. Official estimates are that one in 12 people over 80 who catch the virus will die.
Next week’s legislation allows the government to relax registration requirements for doctors, social workers and pharmacists to enable those who have recently retired to return to the health service. Care workers who have almost finished their qualifications will also be allowed to register.
Doctors will be able to provide a medical certificate detailing the cause of death without seeing the body of the deceased. Senior health professionals other than doctors will be allowed to sign off death certificates, and the requirement for coroners to hold jury inquests will be lifted. Ministers will relax the terms of the Mental Health Act to require fewer doctors in clinics so they can be diverted to help hospitals.
The government has not declared an effective “state of emergency” by enacting powers under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, which would enable ministers to force through legal changes without parliamentary approval.
Tbh, it seems to me that the uks government approach is a combination of snmart arseness based on some very risjy assumptions about 'herd immunity' whilst trying to wing it. Im shocked at the lack of clear planning or advice. They are likely to be caught out by events. I cant see their plan surviving the (inevitable) big rise in cases and fatalities over the next few weeks.Re our gov's strategy i think it might be a bit like this:
There is no way for them to 'win' with this - if they were to go all out right now (close and cancel everything) and that works and so there isn't a disaster, people will think it was a pointless overreaction (see YK2) and resent it. If it doesn't work and people still die, so that everyone will still at least know someone who gets sick and probably a large proportion of us will still get sick all at the same time then thats even worse for the gov.
What I think they are probably trying to do (aside from prevent nhs being absolutely obviously overwhelmed if they can) is keep the impression that there is a plan unfolding and that they have a series of measures kept in reserve to employ one after the other and thereby keep a semblance of control which people may find reassuring, instead of 'using up' all the tools in the box now and then just having to stand there with nothing left to announce apart from frightening statistics.
If they were left like that at this early stage they'd have already lost everyones trust completely. Which would be properly dangerous for them not just politically but also law and order-wise, if thats not too alarmist.
Another bit that I think must be part of their thinking is bloody brexit. They were elected on that promise to Get It Done, and have said just yesterday that they do not intend to delay. Seems mad to me but it will be a factor - if they flatten that curve too much, this thing could roll on into next spring with their voters busy worrying about the virus and their sick relatives etc, which would be a disaster for Johnson and co.
I don't understand this.top doctors keeping off the trains View attachment 201620
Here you go
yes. that article is some kind of leak i think.terrifying