I think perhaps you have just mistaken a sardonic remark for an earnest oneComments questioning if it can be transmitted to humans from animals completely baffle me, either you've not being attention or have really fucking short memories
Nope, definitely not the first; someone I know had a very poorly dog during the main 2020 Lockdown. They had it and then, just before they began to recover, the dog caught it [and they were both tested]. The local vets told me about it, because our dog had been 'friends' with the dog in question.
Yeah Im no expert on these details but I've tended to assume that this and a few other things are why, when trying to judge new epidemics and pandemics, they never think the attack rate is going to be 100%.I've been wondering why or how mdk1 have not managed to get covid despite me working in a patient facing role and mdk1 had been working in a tiny kitchen with young unvaccinated colleagues. This might be the answer?
People testing negative for Covid-19 despite exposure may have ‘immune memory’
Study says some individuals clear virus rapidly due to a strong immune response from existing T-cells, meaning tests record negative resultwww.theguardian.com
I wish my first reaction wasn't 'Is that all?'Another subscription article that I cant read but where the headline is probably enough for now anyway.
NHS expecting covid negligence claims totalling over £800m
The NHS is expecting to receive compensation claims totalling over £800m over its handling of covid-19, HSJ can reveal.www.hsj.co.uk
They generally 'look after' their owners when they're ill, I find.Our cat was poorly when me and the Mrs had it in January. Could have been covid, could have been a coincidence. Cats always seem to act weird around ill people anyway.
Second item, post #1376, vaccines thread.I've been wondering why or how mdk1 have not managed to get covid despite me working in a patient facing role and mdk1 had been working in a tiny kitchen with young unvaccinated colleagues. This might be the answer?
People testing negative for Covid-19 despite exposure may have ‘immune memory’
Study says some individuals clear virus rapidly due to a strong immune response from existing T-cells, meaning tests record negative resultwww.theguardian.com
There's little they can do bar watch anyway. It is very highly likely that SARS-CoV-2 zoonosis and reverse zoonosis has been underway for many months now (post #10152, worldwide thread) and over a range of mammalian species.Its a misleading headline because there is no way its the first dog in the UK to catch Covid, its just the first one they've formally detected and then gone on about.
In terms of doing something about it, this country couldnt be bothered to deal with a variety of human-human vectors of transmission so the authorities arent likely to bother with anything on the human-animal or animal-human front unless it was demonstrated to be a main vector of transmission, and even then they would probably just shrug and offer meaningless reassurances.
They've been finding antibodies in Deer for some time, one study had 40% of the sample show positiveAny reported Covid bovids?
Not stronger. Just cross-reactive populations of T cells possibly from earlier exposures to other human coronaviridae (a number of epitopes, eg in ORF1ab and S2, are preserved across that family) and perhaps associated with prior repeated occupational exposure to low viral loads.I nearly understood bits of that
Do we know why they had stronger T-cells - because they'd actually half caught it but were asymptomatic, and the tests were after this?
Well, as I understand it my vaccine will have lost its oomph some by some time in January, so it might make sense to boost the 40 somethings who will be vulnerable again in the middle of winter I suppose. I'll not be that bothered if they don't though.
Speculation that under 50s could get a booster jab.
They're pinning it all on the vaccine and stoking hesitancy - I suppose they couldn't come out and admit that everyone needs to wear a mask and stay away from people for as long as it takes ..
The plan would involve the winding down of the Covid testing regime, which requires people to get a free test if they have any of the three main symptoms: cough, temperature and loss of smell or taste.
Testing would instead be paid for and left to the private marketplace, despite concerns about some of the companies offering tests. The Competition and Markets Authority are investigating a number of them over misleading claims.
Proposal to end free PCR tests