It’s utterly fucking mental.
Interesting first few lines by Johnson, explicitly rules out 'zero covid'.
We are going to be governed by data not dates
Here are the exact dates we will do things...
Then there’s all the 40, 50, 60 and 70 years olds breaking the rules too. Don’t just blame it on the young, AbeWhether they're licensed or not is besides the point - they won't be protected.
Kind of brings us back around to the argument of when we've vaccinated enough.
There is no need to wait until 20 and 30 year olds are fully vaccinated to restart life. Not that they'll be waiting anyway, you only need to go out into the park or stand about outside some student halls to know that.
Then there’s all the 40, 50, 60 and 70 years olds breaking the rules too. Don’t just blame it on the young, Abe
I've been very cautious, and generally have been very pro-restrictions and lockdowns over the last year, but I think this pace and order feels about right to me tbh. It's still months away for any significant indoor mixing, and there's the caveat that for things to change on those dates they have to fulfill the criteria mentioned.
On schools opening I'm not sure, I don't have a kid and I'm not a teacher so feels a bit not my area, but I can see both sides, and I do know plenty of parents that are desperate for schools to open now (not that I think that should dictate what happens) for some very good reasons.
I think some parents will be at breaking point by now depending on circumstances.I've been very cautious, and generally have been very pro-restrictions and lockdowns over the last year, but I think this pace and order feels about right to me tbh. It's still months away for any significant indoor mixing, and there's the caveat that for things to change on those dates they have to fulfill the criteria mentioned.
On schools opening I'm not sure, I don't have a kid and I'm not a teacher so feels a bit not my area, but I can see both sides, and I do know plenty of parents that are desperate for schools to open now (not that I think that should dictate what happens) for some very good reasons.
I've been very cautious, and generally have been very pro-restrictions and lockdowns over the last year, but I think this pace and order feels about right to me tbh. It's still months away for any significant indoor mixing, and there's the caveat that for things to change on those dates they have to fulfill the criteria mentioned.
On schools opening I'm not sure, I don't have a kid and I'm not a teacher so feels a bit not my area, but I can see both sides, and I do know plenty of parents that are desperate for schools to open now (not that I think that should dictate what happens) for some very good reasons.
There's lots in the last year that I've found very easy with lockdown, but even I'm feeling ready for some easing now, the chance to meet up with people and have some more social contact. And I can see in work (healthcare) that the people I come across are more mentally frayed and more (non-covid) unwell in the last month or so due to the complex issues the last year has caused, so it does feel with the newer data and vaccine roll-out people want and need some things to change.
Today's update -
First dose vaccinations now just under 17.6m - second doses are now just over 615k.
New cases - 9.834, overall a drop of 16.2% in the last week - we were seeing drops of around 25%, so it's worrying to see that drop going down.
New deaths - 215, which is down 43 on last Sunday's 258, that brings the 7-day average down to around 488 a day, a drop of 27.4% in the last week.
is it now? what do you believe it means?Today's update -
First dose vaccinations now just over 17.7m - second doses are now just over 625k - that's a very low increase on yesterday.
New cases - 10,641, overall a drop of 11.1% in the last week - that's another very low percentage drop, compared to the 25%+ we were seeing.
New deaths - 178, which is down 52 on last Monday's 230, that brings the 7-day average down to around 481 a day, a drop of 26.9% in the last week.
New cases - 10,641, overall a drop of 11.1% in the last week - that's another very low percentage drop, compared to the 25%+ we were seeing.
c4uAs I've been saying recently, I'm not sure its fair to even talk about it as dropping any more.
Listening to the rhetoric of recent days, do not be surprised if cases increase from the current level. But that government, after allowing for the lag between different measures, will actually turn this into a celebration of how the ratio of hospitalisations and deaths to cases is changing, and how some of those are still going down while cases rise.UnlessUntil of course something else goes wrong and that isnt what ends up being seen.
Starmer still goes on about solving the problem of school disruption due to high levels of teachers self-isolation by vaccinating teachers. But that is not the only key that would be necessary to unlock such possibilities, the rules would also need to be changed so that people with particular vaccination histories no longer need to follow the self-isolation rules. Or different changes to the self-isolation rules that would have the same effect. And I've not noticed Starmer acknowledging that bit.
Feels like fantasy!Step four, from no earlier than 21 June:
Oh man, I can't wait for this day.
- All legal limits on social contact removed with ambition to reopen final closed sectors of the economy such as nightclubs
- Hope to lift restrictions on large events and performances
- Hope to remove all limits on weddings and other "life events"
He has a point - without changing the isolation rules - if teachers were vaccinated they would (it seems from all the evidence) be less likely to catch it, and thus exhibit symptoms and/or test positive and have to isolate.
The next logical step (on this particular road) would be to vaccinate the people that school staff live with, to minimise the chance that they’d have to isolate second hand (again without changing the rules).
I just can't see step 4 happening in that time frame. I just can't?
Why not? The numbers game that caused this government to bring in strong restrictions contrary to its instincts and perceived economic interests is all about number of people hospitalised. If those equations are fundamentally changed by vaccines then the things proposed seem well possible within the proposed timescales.
Within a month we'll be in a situation where everyone who accepts the jab aged 50 or more will have a reasonable degree of protection whilst most of those under 50 won't. Of course the under 18s won't have any protection as they won't have the vaccine. I don't neglect the problem of kids being off school so long, but leaving it another fortnight or so might have allowed more under 50s to get some protection before the inevitable increase in virus circulation caused by the schools return.None of the "easing" stuff proposed would make a personal difference to me, but at least the only thing that might make things worse (so far anyway) is the schools opening. As Teaboy says there's not much real difference between the open air meetup proposals and what already happens now, which is already very low risk.
My immediate response is to say the schools will be a disaster, mostly because every time this govt relaxes measures it turns out to be too soon, badly done, or otherwise wrong. It's getting quite hard to separate that inductive reasoning from actually thinking about the pros and cons. Maybe I'm better off just not thinking about it at all because there is fuck all I can do anyway.