ruffneck23
front left
funny that, on bbc newswatch this morning a commentator said just thatAnd doing so right by a bbc office. Almost as if Mann's main intention was to get on the telly.
funny that, on bbc newswatch this morning a commentator said just thatAnd doing so right by a bbc office. Almost as if Mann's main intention was to get on the telly.
the comment make for some quite sickening reading as per...Littlejohn's having a field day in the Mail, basically calling the left of the Labour party fascists:
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN on Labour's Jew-baiting lunatic fringe
Isn't Littlecock now residing in Florida? He's still a cunt.Littlejohn's having a field day in the Mail, basically calling the left of the Labour party fascists:
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN on Labour's Jew-baiting lunatic fringe
Sadiq Khan and the Standard really belong together
View attachment 86504
Sadiq Khan: Corbyn must 'get a grip' on Labour's anti-Semitism crisis
Richards said:Never-ending headlines about Naz Shah and Ken Livingstone are damaging, but this is hysteria based on flimsy evidence
Sadiq Khan doesnt really want anything from Corbyn - he is trying his best to score "im my own man" points by "distancing" (aka elbowing sharply in the ribs) Corbyn whenever he feels the need.I'm sure I'm not the first to wonder : what else do 'they' wan't Corbyn to do?
There's stuff in this Steve Richards article that I disagree with (e.g. that sentence about Blair at the start is rubbish ), but in general he at least offers some half way sensible perspective.
Innit. Most of the people I know (admittedly not representative) voted for Khan either because he wasn't Zac Goldsmith, or because they wanted to boost Corbyn. So he should have a little more humility.I thought it a bit rich that Khan was saying "I" won the election. All on his own then, no help from any Labour party members.
Ungrateful sod. He was elected as Labour candidate while Corbyn was leader of the Labour party, and Corbyn's won the odd couple of elections himself as an MP.
Exactly the same i think. Give or take a few. That's where they are and would be regardless of leader - hard right or hard left. It's the cycle and they were at the height of elections won last stage in the cycle. So you expect to lose some in that round.You have to wonder how Labour would have done in the local elections if half the fucking party hadn't been briefing against Corbyn.
You sort of expect it from the media but unforgivable from Labour MPs not to give him a chance after he'd been elected (oooh there was another election he won wasn't it?).
Are you organising?Labour MP suggests Jeremy Corbyn could face leadership challenge next month
reading this makes me wonder if he is ousted how many people will leave the labour party, I certainly would, he is the only reason ive ever joined a political paty
He wont be ousted, not next month anyway. There wont be any challenge.Labour MP suggests Jeremy Corbyn could face leadership challenge next month
reading this makes me wonder if he is ousted how many people will leave the labour party, I certainly would, he is the only reason ive ever joined a political paty
The thing that it says might lead to a challenge won't happen either. This is getting ridiculous. This jumped up little oxbridge shit just begging these journos to quote her.He wont be ousted, not next month anyway. There wont be any challenge.
What difference will it make if you stay or go, if you aren't organising? Same with all those other people who joined last year who've done nothing but make dark threats to leave ever since. So what?nah I'm too lazy , but I think its crazy since Jezza got in the number of memebers has really risen ( in my own , not very well educated , opinion admittedly ) that what do the blairites think is going to happen to people like me who joined, if for only one reason he seems far more for the people than them, fuck off ?
Could be wrong and no one leaves but i cant see it
Yep. I asked the same question last week and had no reply whatsoever. Months and months of it last year but now...What difference will it make if you stay or go, if you aren't organising? Same with all those other people who joined last year who've done nothing but make dark threats to leave ever since. So what?
That has happened here (albeit for other reasons). The new members aren't really involved with the party though, as far as I can tell.In the old days, CLPs had some say - she's be called back to general commtee meeting and told to shut up or something - have they no power to do anything anymore?
■Third, on the military front. Some may think that a military component has no place in an ethical response to Syria. We completely disagree. It is not ethical to wish away the barrel bombs from the Syrian government when you have the capacity to stop them. The deaths and fear generated by these indiscriminate air attacks are the main drivers of the refugee crisis in Europe. Nor is it ethical to watch when villages are overrun by Isis fighters who make sex slaves of children and slaughter their fellow Muslims, when we have the capability to hold them back.
British forces could help achieve an ethical solution in Syria | Andrew Mitchell and Jo Cox
How? You're in the party - make an effort to organise and change the structures or put in place structures to defend what you joined the party to support.im not that important obviously, but 1000's of us non important people may well be
eta, if i did organise something would you join me or are you just spouting for the sake of it ?
to be honest its a bit difficult for me to organise directly as im not living in england at the moment but im still paying my subsThat has happened here (albeit for other reasons). The new members aren't really involved with the party though, as far as I can tell.