J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
Is this the most pathetic behaviour of the Labour Right yet?
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
Is this the most pathetic behaviour of the Labour Right yet?
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
Is this the most pathetic behaviour of the Labour Right yet?
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
Another Labour MP said: "What are we saying to McDonald's employees and the millions of people who eat there? Are we saying they're wrong because Jeremy doesn't support their employment practices?"
Jesus, that's pathetic.Is this the most pathetic behaviour of the Labour Right yet?
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
Labour MP Wes Streeting said the ban revealed a "snobby attitude" among some in the party towards those who work and eat in McDonald's.
Another Labour MP said: "What are we saying to McDonald's employees and the millions of people who eat there? Are we saying they're wrong because Jeremy doesn't support their employment practices?"
Fury erupted when it emerged the business board of the party's ruling National Executive Committee had turned down a £30,000 deal with the fast food giant.
This website revealed yesterday that the decision was taken in protest at the company's refusal to recognise trade unions and use zero hours contracts.
I've just tweeted Streeting, who will probably accuse me of "harrassing him". Thin-skinned little prick.
They should thank their lucky stars they weren't MPs in the 1950s, 60s and 70s.It's odd how holding public servants to account for their public utterances has morphed into being "harassment", isn't it?
Is this the most pathetic behaviour of the Labour Right yet?
Labour chiefs vow to overturn McDonald's party conference ban
It's odd how holding public servants to account for their public utterances has morphed into being "harassment", isn't it?
“It is simply no longer possible to be disabled and a Tory, says angry activist,” was the Guardian’s headline about Graeme Ellis, who ran the Conservative Disability Group website until March’s budget, when he closed it down and denounced Osborne’s cuts to disability benefits. He has now applied to join the Labour Party.
How ‘liberal’ should Labour be?
we've had a year now of the labour big wigs (former) all proclaiming that the only way to appeal to tory voters is by being nearly as cuntish as the tories, so this can't possibly be genuine.... alternatively they're as wrong about that as they are about most other things.Yet another long term Tory joins Labour, baffling in some ways, but Corbyn and Co are very approachable. etc.
Yet, Labour right-wingers get up in arms about socialists wanting to join the party. FFS.Yet another long term Tory joins Labour, baffling in some ways, but Corbyn and Co are very approachable. etc.
Or that there's little difference between the parties but a minor one that a long-term tory activist with their own tory needs finds important. Did you join yet?we've had a year now of the labour big wigs (former) all proclaiming that the only way to appeal to tory voters is by being nearly as cuntish as the tories, so this can't possibly be genuine.... alternatively they're as wrong about that as they are about most other things.
Livingstone has given the fuckers gold...
Of course...but LivingstoneThe usual suspects.
Far too many instances.He should be drummed out just for being a total fucking liability.
The creepy Iain Martin just tweeted this.Of course...but Livingstone
The creepy Iain Martin just tweeted this.
The thing is, Livingstone is correct about Hitler: he did want the Jews to move to another country.
No, but Hitler wanted German Jews out of the country. The Centre Party handed Hitler the Chancellorship.hitler didn't win an election in 1932, he came second to von hindenburg in the german presidential election. and of course he wasn't going to say then 'let's kill all the jews' - he'd have come a poor third behind thalmann
not in 1932 they didn't.No, but Hitler wanted German Jews out of the country. The Centre Party handed Hitler the Chancellorship.
The creepy Iain Martin just tweeted this.
The thing is, Livingstone is correct about Hitler: he did want the Jews to move to another country (Palestine). In that desire, he was little different to the Zionists - especially Jabotinsky's Revisionist Zionists.
1933not in 1932 they didn't.
I know, but what an utter bell-end to wade in with that today.
what a difference a year makes1933
Hitler didn't want to move the Jews to Israel in 1932 as suggested in the nutty tweet. It was not created until 1948 by which time Hitler was dead or living in Argentina depending on your sources.No, but Hitler wanted German Jews out of the country. The Centre Party handed Hitler the Chancellorship.
yes, i hoped a pedant would pop up and say that: and lo and beholdHitler didn't want to move the Jews to Israel in 1932. It was not created until 1948 by which time Hitler was dead or living in Argentina depending on your sources.