Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Cop who hit Tomlinson has a suspected heart attack

Except mine goes to the whole thread, providing the necessary context, whereas your goes only to your original idiotic misunderstanding. Please thae this shit away from this thread - you've been banging on about it for weeks, starting threads, disruptuing threads and so on and it turns out you're actually being totally dishonest.

OK, I accept that
I was in fact giving it some "all knuckle-dragging sky-pixie brain donors" which you interpret as being specifically aimed at muslims. Admittedly, they are probably the most brainwashed and militant of all the knuckle-draggers out there, .
isn't a bigoted statement aimed at, with others, ALL Muslims.

You are right that it shouldn't be here so I'll shut up with the off topic stuff.
 
Yeah. I do feel a bit sorry for him in that i have seem far far worse many times over the years. But i do think it should be properly investigated and he should be charged. Really as you say on the basis of the message it will send out to other OB.

I strongly believe more than the one cop should be facing charges..
Some would even suggest a 'conspiracy', after all they they are now using 'conspiracy' charges against group of activists

Lets hope justice will be served, as yet there is no real indications that, that is the case..
 
so these unseen possibles mean you can find a justification for this case in point for beating a man to the point he loses his life?

can you ...

lets hear you mealy mouthed nonsense then...

I'm waiting DB your justifications for the action or your apology to urban for jumpin the gun assumign that this was another acab thread and for attempting to cast dispersions on a dead man and his potential actions which caused him to be beaten to death...

We'd all like to hear your justifications for what we have seen as clearly no one but you has the insider knowledge to be able to discern a situation where there would be justification for beating a man to death, but if you know of a jusification or hell break your unwritten rule of speculating on the behaviour of the police (just in the same manner you're speculatin on him asking for it in some way... funny how you'll never be drawn into speculating about your ex collugeges but are free and easy with your assumptions and jumping the gun about the victim. which in it's self is telling...).

Come on you piss poor excuse for a wreatch

JUSTIFY YOUR BULLSHIT COMMENTS.

but then you are far to much of a coward to even bother...

try match.com at least you'll get a near perpetual free extension... though i think this has a limit of 2 years...
 
it wasn't 'one bad apple'

there were loads of coppers everywhere, a guy got assaulted and none of them batted an eyelid cos the attacker was in a uniform
 
it wasn't 'one bad apple'

there were loads of coppers everywhere, a guy got assaulted and none of them batted an eyelid cos the attacker was in a uniform

Only at the protest for a while. Thought the OB were quite restrained. Worth going on youtube and looking at how the OB policed the Poll tax demo in 1999....Bit different....
 
Only at the protest for a while. Thought the OB were quite restrained. Worth going on youtube and looking at how the OB policed the Poll tax demo in 1999....Bit different....

my friend who went down to the protest said that most of the time they were just policing it but then for some reason on thursday they started kicking off
 
Only at the protest for a while. Thought the OB were quite restrained. Worth going on youtube and looking at how the OB policed the Poll tax demo in 1999....Bit different....

Not comparing it to the Poll Tax, but seriously, have you seen the Bishopsgate video? (f'starters...)
 
Worth going on youtube and looking at how the OB policed the Poll tax demo in 1999....Bit different....
Poll tax demo in 1990, or J18 in 1999? Either way it wasn't the policing that was different then, it was the punters.
 
This is just bullshit isn't it arrests aren't made on people until all the evidence is complied against them or until they have resonable suspiscion?

Did you man who lashed out with seemingly impunity obtain all the available evidence before striking out?

no of course not.

so why hold others to a standard that you yourself are incapable of reaching let alone maintaining and one which hasn't entered the mind of those gee'ed up and toting semis at the though to knocking heads...




yeah.
and.
so.
what.


really the officer being riled would ahve cause enough for a senior officer to say back in the van til you've cooled off lad but they didn't inferring that the action of a riled up officer was entirely what senior officers were expecting and they clearly (their overwhelming lack of help displays) also sanctioned the letting off of steam of riled colleguges by not stopping them...

someone moving at a pace not considered speedy enough for a police officer should either be moved on or arrested you cannot say it's a ligtimate tactic to beat people into moving on espcially when to move on would require the assulating officer moving out of the way to allow clear passage...

what kind of blame the victim bullshit game are you playing??

there is nothing he could have done which will justify the actions taken against him or indeed any of the protestors who were going about their legally entitle course of action by protesting.

nothing which will justify this.

nothing.

not one thing.

how much clearer can we make it.

nothing.

you might be able to find explainations as to why the action was taken even why the officer involved felt it was justified but cold light of day koshing anyone repeatdly on two seperate occasions, which undoubtly lead to his heart attack (possibly as a result of a weakended heart due to booze) isn't and can never be under civilised society.

you really need to check your the boys never dun bad attitude at the door...

cos they did bad, very bad.



and so these unseen possibles mean you can find a justification for this case in point for beating a man to the point he loses his life?

can you ...

lets hear you mealy mouthed nonsense then...

I'm waiting DB your justifications for the action or your apology to urban for jumpin the gun assumign that this was another acab thread and for attempting to cast dispersions on a dead man and his potential actions which caused him to be beaten to death...

We'd all like to hear your justifications for what we have seen as clearly no one but you has the insider knowledge to be able to discern a situation where there would be justification for beating a man to death, but if you know of a jusification or hell break your unwritten rule of speculating on the behaviour of the police (just in the same manner you're speculatin on him asking for it in some way... funny how you'll never be drawn into speculating about your ex collugeges but are free and easy with your assumptions and jumping the gun about the victim. which in it's self is telling...).

Come on you piss poor excuse for a wreatch

JUSTIFY YOUR BULLSHIT COMMENTS.

but then you are far to much of a coward to even bother...

try match.com at least you'll get a near perpetual free extension... though i think this has a limit of 2 years...

fucking coward...
 
I'm afraid he can't respond, Garfield.

His bullying and aggressive language doesn't work here so he can't browbeat us into submission.

On top of that, there is video evidence of police crime, manslaughter, I'd say.

What could he say?
 
did you guys see this one? about 3.30, a cop gives a woman a serious backhanded slap and then batons her when she remonstrates with them and none of his colleagues saw anything.

 
did you guys see this one? about 3.30, a cop gives a woman a serious backhanded slap and then batons her when she remonstrates with them and none of his colleagues saw anything.


and his number is conviniently covered up. He should be ID'd and then fucking sacked for that alone. And then put on a criminal charge for the assault. I bet he feels really fucking big and hard after that. CUNT.

You gonna defend this low life bit of shit aswell DB?
 
yeah theres a fantastic reason for the back hander which I have no doubt DB will be along to tell us that the sound track ont he tape is by no means conslusive as we can't see what's happening out of shot to justify putting on a harden plastic forearm protector for kendo and beating a woman in the face who was attempting to ask a copper something or for beating a clearly lost and somewaht confused forgine tourist pointing to somewhere on a map and asking how to get there... i mean welcome to london now fuck off...

come on DB justify the actions of you fwiends ...

awwrr police fwiends...
 
the sound track ont he tape is by no means conslusive as we can't see what's happening out of shot

The soundtrack may be from an different incident entirely, and may have been added to this video purely to make the police look bad. By an anarchist. A masked one I expect.
 
The soundtrack may be from an different incident entirely, and may have been added to this video purely to make the police look bad. By an anarchist. A masked one I expect.
innit or some such apologist bollicks....

awwrr police fwiends...
 
did you guys see this one? about 3.30, a cop gives a woman a serious backhanded slap and then batons her when she remonstrates with them and none of his colleagues saw anything.


Our police have turned into caricatures of some futuristic fascistic force...

...or have they?
 
Our police have turned into caricatures of some futuristic fascistic force...

...or have they?

they're just doing what they've been told to do. It's a taste of things to come for those who don't blindly follow the goverment without question. They know what's best for us all, dontchya know :)
 
Try "All of it (including their account / explanation)".

But their original account/explanation was that Mr Tomlinson died of natural causes. A load of old horseshit that turned out to be once the footage of the incident emerged.

Why should any further white washing by the boys in blue be fucking believed?

They act as they please then it's one huge ass covering exercise as per fucking usual.
 
The onus is now on the filth to prove anything they say is true. The default mode of Old Bill is to lie; when this fails, deny. The problem with DB is that he’s been returned to factory settings too often.
 
Really busy and can't read the whole thread sorry. :oops:

I'm thinking "too ill to be questioned, long term sick pay, early retirement, compenstion with no admission of liability, can't question main suspect any more, no criminal case to answer guv'nor" ???

Is that what it looks like?
 
They're now investigating the woman getting thumped.

I hear mobile phones are about to be declared illegal.
 
To be fair to the officer involved, if he's responsible for Mr Tomlinson's death, the guilt could be hitting him hard. If he's not a stone-cold psychopath, but an ordinary man who became hopped-up on adrenaline and media hype, a heart attack isn't out of the question. Most people aren't monsters. Back in the day, some murderers were relieved to be executed.

None of this is offering sympathy for the officer if he's guilty of manslaughter. Just an explanation for this beside a cover-up or malingering.
 
Our police have turned into caricatures of some futuristic fascistic force...

...or have they?

Nah, they're the spiritual descendants of the cunts who used to help the NF give a kicking to us anti-fascists on demos. Why be caricatures of a "future" force, when they've been fascistic (if not actually active fascists) all along? :)
 
Back
Top Bottom