Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Conservative UKIP merger

lol, why would the electoral system matter in this equation? Surely that only serves to narrow the number of examples?
 
Silas Loom said:
They haven't emerged yet, though, have they?

You could say that of any existing pact. Any pact is proof that a pact is actually a merger. They haven't emrged yet though have they !!!

?
 
It's going to happen, isn't it? The Con Home email this morning was all about ways and means of collaborating in shire county coalitions, and electoral pacts for 2015. Local pacts, as with the SDP and Liberals, become alliances, and alliances back into mergers. There just isn't space under FPTP for parties that cannibalise each other.

So the "detoxification" of the Tory party, already knocked by economic conditions which the small-staters could exploit, should be reversed in its entirety over the next couple of years.

It's not. There may a couple of MPs that might defect but there'll be no merger. It's more likely that that the Cameroons and LibDems orange bookers splinter and create a new Liberal Conservative Party than UKIP and the Tory merging...
 
lol, why would the electoral system matter in this equation? Surely that only serves to narrow the number of examples?

In a transferable vote system, a pact wouldn't involve the same level of horsetrading over territory, and so effectively merged decision-making on candidate selection.

Also, the electoral system defines the shape and scale of parties. A pact is more significant if you're a potential challenger or winner than if you're a fringe party whose only hope is to win deals on a single issue.
 
It's not. There may a couple of MPs that might defect but there'll be no merger. It's more likely that that the Cameroons and LibDems orange bookers splinter and create a new Liberal Conservative Party than UKIP and the Tory merging...
That's not going to happen either. The tory party doesn't split. It eats up individual members of other parties. A few leading lib-dems will join the tories - that doesn't require a new party.
 
The Tories are not going to leave the EU. Whilst a number of their party are anti-EU the majority of Tories are pro-Europe for economic reasons. It would cost their backers way too much to leave Europe and would fuck our economy if we did. A merger or coalition with UKIP would be pointless to UKIP.
 
The farage quote is quite spectacular. It lays down dumping the Libs, the Tory leadership and holding a hasty referendum, as a precondition for a pact. Any Tory party that actually delivered may as well serve UKIP it's balls on a plate. He's merely taking a slap at Clegg and the wets
 
The farage quote is quite spectacular. It lays down dumping the Libs, the Tory leadership and holding a hasty referendum, as a precondition for a pact. Any Tory party that actually delivered may as well serve UKIP it's balls on a plate. He's merely taking a slap at Clegg and the wets

Yes, but much of the Tory grassroots would consider all these actions as being a reclaiming of balls.
 
If every party is so convinced they want to be in Europe, then hold a referendum and let the people decide - simple really. Puts it to bed once and for all.

Right. Shall we do that for hanging, as well? And for whether there should be additional bank holidays?
 
Of course we should have a referendum but no party would give us one not even (perhaps especially not) UKIP.
 
Back
Top Bottom