Brainaddict
slight system overdrive
When are you off there anyway DOUF?
revol68 said:oh doUsAfuckingFavour and try to understand the world is alot more complicated than your piss poor analysis. Perhaps you should begin by tryng to decipher how the people in Nepal fee about the issue.
revol68 said:oh yeah cos the Maoists are th eonly ones struggling for a decent existance. Do you really see the world in such fucking black and white terms?
DoUsAFavour said:Change by violent, revolutionary means was tried (for a decade), it even went all the way having over ten thousand peeps killed (the majority by the royalists), but it didn't mean fuck all as the poor people get fucked over doubly now - Royalists AND Maoists.
So 'revol68' as violent and revolutionary means of change have been exhausted (everyone pretty much agrees the "war" is unwinnable and it certainly no longer garners much suppport from the masses), how do you realistically think radical and positive socio-economic change can come about?
Ask the rebel commanders and their violent do-sayers nicely over a cuppa and biccy?
revol68 said:Perhaps you should begin by tryng to decipher how the people in Nepal fee about the issue...".
GEFONT said:July 19, 2005
GEFONT condemns bombing in Reliance Spinning Mills
CPN(Maoist) has caused heavy damage & loss by bombing the Reliance Spinning Mills, which is the largest spinning mills of the country providing employment to thousands of workers. GEFONT Condemns this destructive behavious of maoists.
This act of maoists is against humane values which has pushed more than 10 thlousand peoples from families of workers to the street by explosion in the mill in a situation where country is in heavy unrest with fast declining employment opportunities. We are of the opinin - whoever is involved in such an inhumane & criminal activity should be punished.
We strongly demand for the guarrantee of employment to the workers who have now become unemployed as a result of irresponsible & destructive activity directly damaging the livelihood of the working people. We also ask the Maoists not to repeat such inhumane and terorrist activity in days to come.
Mukunda Neupane
Chairperson, GEFONT-Nepal
blazzers said:(though some of the facts seem a bit dubious - not sure that more than half the population are dalits, but anyway):
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GI20Df01.html
butchersapron said:Maybe a march on the capital?
butchersapron said:(You've actually gone backwards since you've been on here - and you were pretty bloody crude to begin with).
DoUsAFavour said:Are you talking about a peaceful march or a violent one?
DoUsAFavour said:Well lets just say the level of arguement on here has been of the "but commies are bad!! *stamps foot*" variety.
Macabre said:No, the arguement has been the nepali maoists are just as bad as the monarchy with an explanation of first hand experiences and information from nepali people rather than questionable internet sources.
DoUsAFavour said:I disagree, what the king has proposed is a continuation of the current situation, where the majority of the population live without the very basics we hold dear.
The ruling castes are milking the country dry of all it's resources.
The CPN (Maoist) have set forth a forty point set of demands that will take the power and resources of the king and the ruling elite away and put it in the hands of the people.
I have seen no alternative on this thread from anybody who has derided the communists in Nepal on how to tackle the corruption and the inequality of this country.
Bigdavalad said:A question for someone who actually knows a bit about this - how are the Maoists treating the families of Gurkhas in the areas they currently occupy? I'd imagine they might not be that popular with them (tools of the capitalists and all that), but are they being treated any different because a member of their family is a Gurkha? Got a few Gurkha mates, but I don't really want to ask them about it all, for obvious reasons.
Macabre said:just because the Maoists say they will change it doesnt mean they will make the country any better, especially when they have been just a corrupt and brutal as the king.
DoUsAFavour said:Reports have been that many ex-officers have been training the fighters.
JoePolitix said:In addition it seems the Maoists have issued a death threat to the president of the Nepal Teachers Union who happens to be a member of the maoist Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist):
http://www.ahrchk.net/ua/mainfile.php/2005/1130/
JoePolitix said:And here lies the problem for the Maoists. Whilst they have a mass base among the peasantry and popularity in the countryside their dogmatic Staliniod politics, outlook and strategies effectively mean that they will only ever alienate the urban proletariat, a vital ally in the transformation of Nepalese society.
DoUsAFavour said:From what well research papers I have been reading the royal army has been responsible for most of the murders.
In addition to that, the majority of the killings carried out by the maoist have been of police and army.
So where is your credible evidence that the maosits are as 'corrupt and brutal as the King'?
BTW don't bother with the neoliberal propaganda.
Macabre said:No one is saying the military hasnt killed anyone, and whos killed more isnt the point at this stage.
Macabre said:woopdy doo, you've read some papers. All highly impartial and accurate im sure.
DoUsAFavour said:When you claim that the Maoists are as "corrupt and brutal as the king" you need to back it with more than supposed claims from your 5 week holiday.
...I went on holiday in the Himilayas for a few months a few years ago and met some Nepalis who were there for the work not because of persecution.
DoUsAFavour said:Written by respected peer reviewed academics who are verifiable unlike some random anonymous character on t'internet such as your good self.
Macabre said:Like I said, its not about whos killed who but who will actually deliver their promise of a better future for the Nepali's.
KATHMANDU, 16 Sep 2005 (IRIN) - Torture and ill-treatment were still systematically practiced in various detention centres in Nepal run by the police and the Royal Nepal Army (RNA), concluded Manfred Nowak, the Special Rapporteur on Torture of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, who ended a seven-day visit to the country on Friday.
"There was repeated and frank admission by senior and military officials that torture was acceptable in some instances," said Nowak, who was deeply concerned about the prevailing culture of impunity for those responsible.
Maoist rebels have been waging a nine-year rebellion against the state. Many civilians who have been arrested on suspicion of being Maoists have been severely tortured, according to hundreds of credible reports from human rights organisations.
Many were arrested and detained under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Control & Punishment) Act (TADA), introduced in 2002. The act gives special powers to the authorities to arrest any suspect without a warrant.
The TADA was replaced by a new Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Control and Punishment) Ordinance (TADO) in 2004, which increased provision for detention without charge or trial for up to one year. Nowak remarked that such an act effectively provides the police and military with sweeping powers to detain suspects for preventive reasons.
During his visits to victims and detainees, Nowak was told that the methods of torture included beatings with bamboo poles and plastic pipes, kicking, electric shock to the ears, jumping on thighs and legs, as well as hanging detainees upside down and beating the feet.
An army official told Nowak during his interview at a barracks near Nepalganj, 500 km west of Nepal, that they often tortured prisoners to get them to admit they were Maoists.
revol68 said:sorry but that UN report doesn't tell us anything we don't know.
I could paste up a fucking report about Saddam Hussein but it doesn't justify the US and Britains death campaign. LIkewise I could post up stuff about what loyalists have done but it hardly exonorates republican atrocities, does it?
Padma Ratna Tuladhar, a noted human-rights activist and mediator of last year’s government-Maoist peace talks, scoffs at such characterizations. “They are not terrorists. They have been fighting for a cause. But the government has virtually failed to address their problems in a right way.” Gautam agrees: “Given Nepal’s history, if the Maoists hadn’t emerged, somebody else would have.”