Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

C4 will be privatised

Banks showing what a nasty little man he actually is:


Anyone coming late to this thread may be wondering why the tweet by the odious scumbag Banks is unavailable. I and I imagine a fair few other people reported the tweet. The report was upheld and Banks has now taken it down, still on Twitter alas.

E2a fortunately someone did a screenshot:

1649254643145.png
 
Last edited:
So, the government is pressing ahead with it's plans to sell off C-4 , despite little support amongst the public, even less amongst the rest of the UK media industry, all we can do is hope they don't find political support for it, which is probably only a slim possibly.

The government insists that the publicly owned channel needs to be sold off, but there are doubts over whether they have the political support required to pass the necessary legislation. Ministers will also finally publish the conclusions of a 60,000-strong public consultation on the sale, with most comments expected to be against privatisation.

On Wednesday the culture minister Julia Lopez told the House of Commons that the government has concluded Channel 4 needs private ownership in order to survive, even though almost the entire British media industry is publicly opposed to the plan.

Sir Peter Bottomley, the father of the house, told the House of Commons on Wednesday: “Channel 4 is in the best state it’s been creatively and financially for decades.”

The Tory MP suggested that ministers may have been offended by some of its news coverage – such as replacing Boris Johnson with a melting ice sculpture in a climate breakdown debate – and added that the “government could do best by leaving it alone”.

Damian Green, another former Tory minister, expressed “profound scepticism” about the government’s privatisation plans and said the media industry was united in “saying Channel 4 isn’t broke and doesn’t need fixing in this way”.

 
I thought Michelle Donelan was education secretary?

Also, how can you have a secretary of state for an adjective? Is it too much to ask that government departments are at least named by, if not actually run by, someone functionally literate?
 
I thought Michelle Donelan was education secretary?

Also, how can you have a secretary of state for an adjective? Is it too much to ask that government departments are at least named by, if not actually run by, someone functionally literate?
Misplaced comma. It should be Secretary of State for Digital Culture, Media and Sport.
 
you can blame Theresa May for adding the nonsensical "Digital, " as a noun to the department name.
even worse, the official acronym remained DCMS instead of becoming DDCMS to match.

could be worse though. before Blair it was the Dept of National Heritage which sounds like it would only be considered with the past and not legislate for anything operating in the present day.
 
Looks like it's off again


It has now been confirmed, according to Sky News.

ETA - and the BBC.

 
Statement from Channel 4 in response to a decision and statement by the Government
Category:News Release
Back to news
5 January 2023
We welcome the Government’s decision that Channel 4 will remain in public ownership. This decision provides a firm basis on which to establish the sustainable direction of Channel 4, safely in the hands of the British people.

DCMS having thoroughly examined the business case concluded that the privatisation of Channel 4 is not the best way to ensure its long term sustainability. Furthermore, its decision allows us to do even more to support creative jobs and skills across the UK, to inspire and develop the UK’s world-leading creative industries, and to continue opening up the sector for those aspiring to a career in TV and film.

For over 40 years Channel 4 has been a keystone of Britain’s universal, free, public service broadcasting architecture. We have spoken up for diverse and young audiences across the UK, nurtured new talent and held power to account. But standing still has never been an option for Channel 4 throughout our history. Indeed, our next stage of evolution is already well under way.

In more recent years we have extended a digital embrace to Britain’s young people. We have invested more in creative production companies in their own communities, the length and breadth of the UK. We have put record amounts into TV and film content, consistently showing original, relevant and challenging television.

In the future we will double our investment in 4Skills, training a new cohort of TV professionals from all places and all backgrounds. We are determined to make it true that neither where you live nor what your parents do are barriers to a career in our extraordinary industry.

The Government has declared its intention to legislate to remove the publisher-broadcaster requirement that currently applies to Channel 4. We welcome the Government's commitment to engage closely with the independent production sector about the potential impact of this proposal, and we await further detail. We will contribute constructively to these discussions.

Channel 4 is grateful to all those who have contributed to the debate about how best not just to preserve, but also to magnify our contribution to the industry, to local communities and to wider culture in Britain and abroad.

Distinctly British content for British audiences, and honest and impartial news, have never been more vital. The depth of our relationships with our production partners, and our unrivalled ability to discover new voices, gives Channel 4 a precious link to the British public. To this, we remain committed. We look forward to delighting audiences and supporting British creativity for the next four decades and beyond.
 
Back
Top Bottom