some of the stories on that site - like the one about the censorship of poems, etc, are so unbelievable they're actually quite funny, and then you realise they're true
Is this for real?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7236648.stm
"The military's roadmap for democracy has been widely dismissed as a sham by observers."
I'm not surprised - so is this just a way to divide the opposition?
Shit. The slaying of a much-respected ethnic leader. Expect more targeted assassinations and a ratcheting up of repression as the transition to the 'disciplined democracy' gathers pace.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7244684.stm
Fixed the link.
Shit. The slaying of a much-respected ethnic leader. Expect more targeted assassinations and a ratcheting up of repression as the transition to the 'disciplined democracy' gathers pace.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7244684.stmhttp://
In a statement, the BBC said the guide book - one of 288 published by Lonely Planet - "provides information and lets readers decide for themselves".
...
BBC Worldwide says it has "carefully reviewed that position and has no plans to withdraw the guide".
"It provides information and lets readers decide for themselves."
It's a bit rich for the TUC to think they can speak for the entire people of Burma. 'The people' don't oppose tourism - quite the opposite. Many eke out a living through tourism as best they can. At least two MPs from Suu Kyi's party own some small guesthouses and hotels in various places around the country, and the debate is wide open within the party and other opposition groups, despite ASSK's views. I hope she'd only encourage debate.The TUC's international secretary, Owen Tudor, said Lonely Planet was being singled out because "The country's main trade union organisation and the people of Burma oppose tourism."
I've long been a defender of supporting careful, independent tourism to Burma. But I'm in agreement with you about the knee-jerk, ill-considered response of the BBC though, it's clear that they've given this no thought whatsoever.
It's a bit rich for the TUC to think they can speak for the entire people of Burma. 'The people' don't oppose tourism - quite the opposite. Many eke out a living through tourism as best they can. At least two MPs from Suu Kyi's party own some small guesthouses and hotels in various places around the country, and the debate is wide open within the party and other opposition groups, despite ASSK's views. I hope she'd only encourage debate.
What does put dollars into government coffers is the group trips organised by overseas firms who scour the country for the best hotel and transport deals. Those that can keep costs down enough to win these contracts are most likely to have connections to the junta, who permit them to pay little if any tax in return for support and services.
LP needs to pay careful attention to the hotels and companies featured in its Burma guide. All the information they need can be gleaned through careful investigation and talking to locals, as most locals would know which people had government connections. At the moment it pays no attention to this and there are 'highly recommended' hotels in there owned by total bastards.
It's all about the referendum on the new constitution, due to be held in May. The constitution will almost certainly be a sham, we know for sure that it gives 25% of the parliamentary seats to the military, and the future head of state must be a military figure. For the other 75%, they're making damn sure that any future election (due in 2010, even though the constitution hasn't been voted on) won't bring about any inconvenient results like 1990. There are 'recruitment drives' for the USDA - current membership 26 million - going on all around the country. It's likely that the USDA will 'help' members decide which party to vote for in a future election, and how to vote in the referendum.I'd be interested to know what the situation in Burma is now, given that I haven't heard anything about it for ages
And Gambari called this a 'significant step forward'. Barring a miracle, the future looks very bleak.Not even feigning an attempt at meeting international standards for free and fair polling, the laws specifically ban the public distribution of information related to the referendum as well as the delivery of public speeches. These offences are made punishable by either a prison sentence or fine.
OMG DESTRUCTIONISTS!!!!! crush them all ... bloody doctors and aids counsellors, trying to bring the end of the regimeirrawaddy said:Regime Restricts More NGO Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By VIOLET CHO Wednesday, March 26, 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT SIZE
Burma’s military regime has imposed further restrictions on international non-government organizations (NGOs) working in Burma, voicing concerns over their activities at grassroots levels in the run-up to the constitutional referendum in May.
According to one NGO source, earlier this month the authorities called a meeting with international organizations working in Burma and ordered every group to cease all activities at grassroots level in health education and counseling for HIV/AIDS patients, especially in rural areas.
Among the organizations that have been warned by authorities are Save the Children Fund, Population Services International (PSI), Marie Stopes International (MSI), Care International in Myanmar (Care-Myanmar) and World Vision.
According to an international NGO worker who asked not to be named for security reasons, NGOs can only carry out their projects if they allow staff from the official health department to oversee their activities.
“They [the authorities] allowed us to open our office, but now all the activities have to stop,” he said. “They also asked us to report every single thing we do in the field. It is very difficult to implement our project because we can only work when there is government staff with us.”
During the meeting between Burma’s Ministry of Health and UN special envoy Ibrahim Gambari on March 9, the minister of health, Dr Kyaw Myint, reportedly informed Gambari that the government was aware that some international NGOs were providing financial support to Burma’s main opposition party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), who, in turn, was distributing it at a grassroots level.
The NLD’s youth group, led by HIV/AIDS activist Phu Phu Thin, is known to provide health care, counseling and HIV/AIDS education in Rangoon.
In mid-January, Dr San Shwe Win, the deputy director general of the Public Health Department, called a meeting with international NGOs in Burma’s new capital, Naypyidaw. During the meeting, he informed the NGO heads that they had to report on all their activities and that they could only continue their work if they receive permission from the Public Health Department. Reportedly, the military authorities also strongly warned NGOs against fact-finding missions or research projects in the country.
There are more than 34 organizations that deal with HIV/AIDS issues in Burma. All of these health groups are registered with Burma’s Ministry of Health.
Just recently, a clinic known as the Drop-in Centre, which works on HIV/AIDS issues and provides counseling to patients, was ordered by authorities to halt their activities, according to a Burmese doctor close to international organizations in Rangoon.
Mandalay Health Department issued a letter earlier this month ordering the Drop-in Center to stop all their programs with grassroots people without giving any reason.