Ive had a look at the Planning Statement on the long list of documents on the Lambeth planning portal. Its the best to look at first to get overview of the planning considerations. Unfortunately it has no pictures.
The scheme has plus and minuses.
The weakest part of the application is the height and affect on the adjacent Brixton Conservation Area ( BCA). It is as Brixton Buzz article shows a visible intrusion on the local Conservation Area streetscape. The site the proposed building is on is just outside the BCA. If it was inside I doubt it would get through planning.
Throughout the document and likely at planning committee the applicant is pushing the idea that this is a "new local landmark". So a positive contribution to Brixton townscape.
I do think in opposing the application this is the weak link in the application.
To argue its a "New Local Landmark" is pushing it a bit. The applicant is saying its ( in applicants view) high quality design by famous architects company justifies this "Landmark" building.
The plus points in application.
- At ground level the public realm will fit in with existing covered markets / Popes road and improve the space. The applicant is offering to demolish the existing toilet block and reprovision in ( says toilets will be free to use) in the development thus freeing up space for improved public realm.
- Hondo say they will do a deal with Impact Brixton to rehouse them to manage the affordable office space. If this is not to be watered down at later stage it should imo be written into a Section 106 agreement. Planning guidelines mean that a development of this size will be required to have a small percentage of affordable office space. Impact Brixton are one of the Councils favourite projects. Its clever move by Hondo to dangle this large carrot in front of Council. Brixton BID are likely to be falling over themselves to support this application partly due to this. Hondo spend a lot of time going on about this.
- Its going to be office space not a hotel. Office space is needed.
I had a look at Energy and Carbon footprint in the Planning Document. Its going to be BREEAM excellent. However I notice its not going to be able to be retrofitted to be part of decentralised enegy supply. Nor is it going to be carbon neutral. Its going to fulfill planning obligations and no more than that.
As with a lot of new planned developments its not cutting edge architecture to meet challenge of climate change.
I do feel that it should be capable of being linked up to decentralised energy supply in the future. As this is one aspect of moving to zero carbon future. It also was one of the better ideas in the Brixton Masterplan.
So trying to be dispassionate about Hondo, the company that trying to evict Nour Cash and Carry, this application is a mixed bag.
Its the height and imposition on the BCA that is the problem. As
CH1 says its overdevelopment of a small site. Like the Hero of Switzerland site in LJ the developer is trying to maximise the profit they could get out of the site by building high.
Im also wondering if it will really improve things for Brixton Village. Will it improve footfall? Or will the new food court and retail space in the ground level of the new development be more competition for Brixton Village existing traders?
There is also little that Ive seen yet ( perhaps someone else looking at docs might put me right) on how public the public space will be. Ive seen on large developments in the City and West End that "public" space on new developments is heavily policed by onsite security. With lists of rules. The question is will this new public space indirectly discriminate against the less fortunate locals who hang about central Brixton?
A further point is that the applicant is making big claims about improving Popes Road but I wonder what will become of the street traders now operating in Popes road? I can see them being displaced by this development.