I regularly walk down that street. It's a small group of regular street users who gather there daily.
It's bad but it's not anything like as terrible as that article suggests. I lived in downtown Brixton for many years til 2012 when I moved up the Hill. When the Windrush Square development was going on the dealers and users moved from there into our street. We had dealers and users on our doorstep for a while.
There were plenty of incidents (including defecation, open daytime drug use, finding a dealers stash of rocks hidden in my front garden, and a kitchen knife) but nothing that made me feel personally besieged or attacked or in danger. Even when they quarreled outside my front door I didn't feel victimised. I just asked them to move and they did.
My point is that I really don't think it's worse than it was. I think the Brixton demographic has changed, expectations and attitudes have changed, and the way the area policed may have changed.
That crack down on crack houses thing led to several house raids and gun sieges in my street and nearby. Those were far more disruptive to my daily life than the drug stuff was.
I'm not defending the drug use stuff. But it's stupid to think that it will magically go away if there are more cops around.
Back then, I spoke to the cops pretty frequently. The drug stuff in the street did annoy me, because it was constant and there didn't seem to be any policing at all at all. They told me they couldn't do anything because
- It was the busiest ward in the UK, with not enough police or funding
-arresting rarely led to conviction and even when it did, they were back on the street in no time, using&dealing exactly as before.
They said they policed the ward like a clock face: this section got attention for a while, then the next section, then the next til they were back at the beginning again. It gave each area a break for a while. And the street crime just moved on to the next patch, just as the cops did, round the same circuit.
No idea if this was true, or if so if it's still the case.
Street users and dealers are part of our society and our community. Until/unless the problems and issues are sorted out at the grass roots level they'll always be with us. That's a far deeper more fundamental issue than just policing the way it impacts on homeowners. Once again, property is the thing that motivates action.
And incidentally, whenever I've had reason to interact with these users (either on Rushcroft Rd or on Windrush Sq or round the back of the St Matthew's church : it's the same people) they've been polite and not problematic at all.
I'm not romanticising or downplaying it. It's not great, and when I had to deal with it I didn't like it. I'm saying it's not the dire dreadful disaster suggested in that article.