Sorry, I was wrong earlier. This nonsense IS comical.
You fucking clown.
Ouch
Sorry, I was wrong earlier. This nonsense IS comical.
You fucking clown.
yeh, but you're having trouble defending them.
yeh, but you're having trouble defending them.
i don't think bf are growing
you have chosen a very strange thing to fight over and then introduced arguments which don't support the notion that you've given this much thoughtThe far right in Europe is growing.
you've been shown up you pathetic idiot, by several posters, go run away now, take your emoticons with youI know I’m on the right side of the debate if my opponents are Rutita, Ddraig and Andy Says.
you have chosen a very strange thing to fight over and then introduced arguments which don't support the notion that you've given this much thought
you've been shown up you pathetic idiot, by several posters, go run away now, take your emoticons with you
when you say 'the modern left' you're less than specific. do you mean the likes of the afn? of uaf? of the labour party? all of the modern left?As far as I can tell, the modern left do more to aid the far right than stunt it. This thread hasn’t convinced me that I’m wrong on that point.
The far right in Europe are growing. Perhaps now is the time to question what’s being done wrong?
*handing BF a propaganda victory is placed within the context above ^^
when you say 'the modern left' you're less than specific. do you mean the likes of the afn? of uaf? of the labour party? all of the modern left?
desperate stuff, flailing now, poor poor magnusI’d there actually any point to you?
desperate stuff, flailing now, poor poor magnus
you on your way to the court to support your mates against the terrible injustice they've suffered?Fantasy stuff.
you on your way to the court to support your mates against the terrible injustice they've suffered?
you are the one with a shitty agenda over many threads and here bleating about their unfair treatmentThey’re your mates. You liberals give them the best leg up.
I’m not ‘losing’ - I’ve made my points and I stand by them. I can leave it at that.
I become less arsed when it’s just some pile on with twats with an axe to grind. Enjoy your weekend.
I know I’m on the right side of the debate if my opponents are Rutita, Ddraig and Andy Says.
'idpol' is a particular set of political assumptions and behaviours. It is not the same thing as hate crime laws. HTH.The ones who are latching into this idpol crap - seemingly the majority along with plenty on here.
Is that it? Is that all you've got?
You've proved yourself to be a complete tit on this thread as well as others and the only good thing about this is more and more posters are now wise to this fucked up agenda you have developed over recent years.
Your arguments are all over the place and every time you get called on it you scream 'pile on/liberals/IDpolitickers'. You are doing fuck all other than arguing fash arguments and then getting all sulky, taking your ball home and blaming every one else when it's pointed out to you.
Utter depressing.
'idpol' is a particular set of political assumptions and behaviours. It is not the same thing as hate crime laws. HTH.
When I was young, a group of asian youths set on me and a mate for having the audacity of hanging round on a street corner waiting for the cinema to open. We're both white.Being a victim of racism is not about single isolated incidents, however unpleasant they may be. Racism is a constant presence, that impacts people's lives in a multitude of ways. I realised that while I (a white English person in Britain) could be a victim of a racially motivated attack, I cannot experience racism. There is a qualitative difference between the two
They’re unconnected to identity?
You can be against a form of politics that sees the world as merely a set of competing identities of varying privileges, and still believe in the need to fight racism and homophobia etc ffs.They’re unconnected to identity?
Identity isn't the same thing as identity politics.
You can be against a form of politics that sees the world as merely a set of competing identities of varying privileges, and still believe in the need to fight racism and homophobia etc ffs.
You are using the words identity politics to deny the legitimacy of any struggle involving a minority group and you do it in thread after thread. It's either sheer ignorance or something more sinister imo.
so in the case of regina v golding and fransen you think that regina is some sort of anti-racist?I don’t agree with using the state as a vehicle for anti-racism - and there ought not to be anything controversial about that position.
who is using the state as a vehicle for anti-racism? answers on a postcard pls.
Yes but these things don’t exist in a vacuum and it’s long been accepted that neoliberalism has co-opted identity politics as it’s able to dole out equality on that basis (whilst economic inequality widens).
You don't have to hold to ID politics to think that racism should be an aggravating factor in crime.
There’s a select few who think this and they are idpol/liberals. Funny coincidence ey?