Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Britain First

Why? How on earth is it doing them favours? You think it acts as a recruiting sergeant for BF or something daft like that? The only people getting up in arms about this are dickheads like them.

You are basically advocating that racism, as an element of other crimes, should go unpunished. Bonkers.

I’m not saying it should go unpunished. In fact I’m not going to repeat myself. I made my points up thread.
 
i don't know about you but i was pleased when charlie sargent out of c18 was put away for murder. i don't see taking some pleasure from the jailing of fascists as bad. it doesn't mean you support the whole state structure, it means taking pleasure in bad things happening to bad people.

I suppose the liberals will sleep sounder under the illusion that the state will protect them from fascism.
 
I read that Britain Furst have stupidly printed the prison address for their beloved leader. Should be interesting when she gets tons of hate mail. :cool:
 
I’ve made my points. I’m not playing merry-go-rounds with you.
You haven't made any points, dude. Not coherent ones anyway. You've said that banging them up for longer because of the hate element is doing them a favour but you haven't said why, and (I think) you've said that racism should be punished but argued the exact opposite. Can you see why I'm confused? :hmm:
 
You haven't made any points, dude. Not coherent ones anyway. You've said that banging them up for longer because of the hate element is doing them a favour but you haven't said why, and (I think) you've said that racism should be punished but argued the exact opposite. Can you see why I'm confused? :hmm:

I covered it in post #655. You didn’t pull me then so I can only assume you joined the thread late and haven’t read previous points.
 
I covered it in post #655. You didn’t pull me then so I can only assume you joined the thread late and haven’t read previous points.
Post #655 isn't really clear at all. Are you arguing against the very notion of racially aggravated crime being a legal concept with harsher sentences, or simply saying that it shouldn't have been applied in this particular case because the political context might help boost Britain First?
 
Post #655 isn't really clear at all. Are you arguing against the very notion of racially aggravated crime being a legal concept with harsher sentences, or simply saying that it shouldn't have been applied in this particular case because the political context might help boost Britain First?

I’m making a political/antifascist argument that it’s counter productive to make them martyrs / play into their narrative.
 
I covered it in post #655. You didn’t pull me then so I can only assume you joined the thread late and haven’t read previous points.

They could simply have had their collars felt for harassment. What has happened is they’ve had aggravating factors bolted on which plays right into their narrative of minorities getting special treatment which helps their organisations grow. All being cheered on by you.

The "aggravating factor" being racism.

That doesn't cover anything though does it. The only narrative of minorities getting special treatment is by dickheads for dickheads. It's not going to convince anyone remotely reasonable.

Seriously. Right here you are arguing that the racism in this case shouldn't be punished. Absolutely slap-bang, that's what you're saying.
 
I’m making a political/antifascist argument that it’s counter productive to make them martyrs / play into their narrative.

You are arguing that the racist element of their crimes be ignored so we don't upset them, other racists or would be racists. Not very socialist/antifacist of you at all.

FFS, they got weeks not years!! Martyrs? Have a word with yourself.
 
The "aggravating factor" being racism.

That doesn't cover anything though does it. The only narrative of minorities getting special treatment is by dickheads for dickheads. It's not going to convince anyone remotely reasonable.

Seriously. Right here you are arguing that the racism in this case shouldn't be punished. Absolutely slap-bang, that's what you're saying.

Looking over at places like Austria, Italy, France, Hungary, I feel a growing unease at how the far right are developing. This is all under the European liberal consensus.
So pardon me if me if challenging some shibboleths causes offence.
 
Looking over at places like Austria, Italy, France, Hungary, I feel a growing unease at how the far right are developing. This is all under the European liberal consensus.
So pardon me if me if challenging some shibboleths causes offence.
not sure how you got here from where you were
 
Looking over at places like Austria, Italy, France, Hungary, I feel a growing unease at how the far right are developing. This is all under the European liberal consensus.
So pardon me if me if challenging some shibboleths causes offence.

So because you are scared you are arguing nonsense about ignoring racism as an element of hate crime because racists will be upset and recruit more racists!?!?!? Right you are.
 
Back
Top Bottom