Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Britain First

share the address

IMG_20180309_WA0000.jpg
 
Arrests over racist chants at university

NTU has suspended the "suspected perpetrators" pending inquiries.

Two 18-year-old men have been arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated public order offences.

The nonsense on this thread argues that these arseholes should just be reprimanded for singing out of tune in an intimidating way lest we have to endure the wrath of other racist fuckwits because how very dare the state/society recognise racism as a influencing factor of abuse/harrassment.
 
Arrests over racist chants at university
The nonsense on this thread argues that these arseholes should just be reprimanded for singing out of tune in an intimidating way lest we have to endure the wrath of other racist fuckwits because how very dare the state/society recognise racism as a influencing factor of abuse/harrassment.

Oh Ruti come on they weren't even racist. Just stupid first years playing up!
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't 9 months a kinda special sentence i.e. it allows a judge to ensure max time served with minimum chance of early release ? I know this was the case years ago when a 9'er was rather less welcomed than an 12'er

I don't think so. This may have been the case in the early days of releases on tag, but the guidelines now are that release on a tag is available for sentences of between 3 months and 4 years - so in theory, a 36 week sentence means you'll be eligible for such after 9 weeks, rather than after 3 months for a 12 month sentence.

Without a tag release, you'll be released on probation at the 50% point of your sentence (for relatively short determinate sentences like these). Sentences of 12 months+ are served on license with active supervisation by the Parole Service, while those under 12 months aren't actively supervised. So, a 36 week sentence in this situation not only means an earlier release, but less subsequent grief dealing with probation.
 
So they got off lightly, in effect. Why am I not surprised?
It was dealt with in a Magistrates' Court, meaning a max sentence of 6 months (per charge - Fransen's longer sentence is due to the 3 convictions not being treated as a single offence). With the aggravating factor, it could have been sent to Crown Court for trial, where the maximum would be 2 years per charge. So, it does seem that the CPS were happy to aim for sentences at the lower end of the potential scale, for whatever reason.
 
It was dealt with in a Magistrates' Court, meaning a max sentence of 6 months (per charge - Fransen's longer sentence is due to the 3 convictions not being treated as a single offence). With the aggravating factor, it could have been sent to Crown Court for trial, where the maximum would be 2 years per charge. So, it does seem that the CPS were happy to aim for sentences at the lower end of the potential scale, for whatever reason.

Avoids the trouble/risk of a jury trial which would be unlikely to end in a greater sentence on conviction in any case.
 
The defendants wouldn't have opted for a Crown Court trial because of the greater sentencing powers but the CPS aren't going to risk a not guilty jury verdict on the hope of a mildly longer sentence.
 
It was dealt with in a Magistrates' Court, meaning a max sentence of 6 months (per charge - Fransen's longer sentence is due to the 3 convictions not being treated as a single offence). With the aggravating factor, it could have been sent to Crown Court for trial, where the maximum would be 2 years per charge. So, it does seem that the CPS were happy to aim for sentences at the lower end of the potential scale, for whatever reason.
iirc magistrates can refer to crown court for sentencing if they feel they can't impose a suitable sentence: i await confirmation/correction
 
Britain First leader has 'nose broken' in prison attack

The leader of the the far-right group Britain First has been attacked in prison less than a week after being jailed for abusing Muslims .

Paul Golding , 36, was beaten up in HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent on Wednesday by two inmates who are believed to have left him with a suspected broken nose.

Police are now understood to be investigating the alleged attack.
 
Britain First leader has 'nose broken' in prison attack

The leader of the the far-right group Britain First has been attacked in prison less than a week after being jailed for abusing Muslims .

Paul Golding , 36, was beaten up in HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent on Wednesday by two inmates who are believed to have left him with a suspected broken nose.

Police are now understood to be investigating the alleged attack.
 

Attachments

  • 2fb1f0ff1589fb03ffa4814f3aef0929.jpg
    2fb1f0ff1589fb03ffa4814f3aef0929.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 8
iirc magistrates can refer to crown court for sentencing if they feel they can't impose a suitable sentence: i await confirmation/correction

Yes, you're right - "either way" offences can be dealt with at either magistrates' or Crown court, depending on the specifics, but will start with an appearance at a magistrates' court. If the defendant pleads guilty at this appearance, the magistrate can decide to commit to Crown Court for sentencing if they believe the offence warrants a stiffer sentence than they can impose.
 
Britain First leader has 'nose broken' in prison attack less than a week after being jailed for racist abuse

Paul Golding, 36, was beaten up in HMP Elmley on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent on Wednesday by two inmates
 
Back
Top Bottom