Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BREXIT Crunch time (part 38) WTF is going to happen next?

Brexit crunch - WTF happens next?


  • Total voters
    150
  • Poll closed .
No, he had a steak sandwich. It came with rocket, parmesan, and a horseradish mayonnaise, and chips. His wife/girlfriend/friend/work associate had the same.

They didn't have desert.
Did the woman with him look like SamCam?

Pictures? Plus I hope you followed them to the car park and recorded the number plate of their car(s). Otherwise stalker level = amateur.
 
Sounds like she really is having a 4th go - shittest Terminator ever. Once you've had a 4th go you are into mad territory. 'Yeah, well we had 3 goes at it, but did the sensible thing after and resigned' >>>>>> 'failed on number 4 eh? Ah well, may as well have a few more tries. At least until infinity'.
 
It's this sort of attitude, that will get the country sacked. Mrs May has been very patient with us.
She has indeed. Every day she has to go home to her money laundering husband and face the inevitable question: 'how did it go today dear?'
-
another fail, look I just don't want to talk about it. Factions everywhere!
'I know I know, it's very similar for me, dealing with the Colombian cartels'
 
She has indeed. Every day she has to go home to her money laundering husband and face the inevitable question: 'how did it go today dear?'
-
another fail, look I just don't want to talk about it. Factions everywhere!
'I know I know, it's very similar for me, dealing with the Colombian cartels'
Perhaps the cartel do a 2 for 1 offer in which couples can be immured in the same concrete pillar
 
She has indeed. Every day she has to go home to her money laundering husband and face the inevitable question: 'how did it go today dear?'
-
another fail, look I just don't want to talk about it. Factions everywhere!
'I know I know, it's very similar for me, dealing with the Colombian cartels'
and he still finds time to put the bins out.

GAWD BLESS THE PAIR OF EM
 
Let's say, for argument's sake, that one of the indicative votes gets a significant majority on Monday. Ken Clarke's amendment perhaps, or the put it to a referendum one, with a healthy 20 or 30 vote majority.

Theresa May says "no, stop getting it wrong and vote my deal through."

Who exactly is of sufficient authority to drag the deluded arsehole kicking and screaming out of the chamber?
 
Sounds like she really is having a 4th go - shittest Terminator ever. Once you've had a 4th go you are into mad territory. 'Yeah, well we had 3 goes at it, but did the sensible thing after and resigned' >>>>>> 'failed on number 4 eh? Ah well, may as well have a few more tries. At least until infinity'.
It's a bit rich calling it a meaningful vote when she just keeps bringing the damn thing back and asking them to vote again. If We now get a long extension she'll probably just use most of it to bring back her agreement every couple of weeks and try again.
 
Let's say, for argument's sake, that one of the indicative votes gets a significant majority on Monday. Ken Clarke's amendment perhaps, or the put it to a referendum one, with a healthy 20 or 30 vote majority.

Theresa May says "no, stop getting it wrong and vote my deal through."

Who exactly is of sufficient authority to drag the deluded arsehole kicking and screaming out of the chamber?
The queen's champion and standard bearer of england, francis dymoke
 
Let's say, for argument's sake, that one of the indicative votes gets a significant majority on Monday. Ken Clarke's amendment perhaps, or the put it to a referendum one, with a healthy 20 or 30 vote majority.

Theresa May says "no, stop getting it wrong and vote my deal through."

Who exactly is of sufficient authority to drag the deluded arsehole kicking and screaming out of the chamber?

The indicative votes have no legal authority (hence the name). However in theory Parliament could pass a bill requiring the chosen option to happen. If May didn’t support it she’d have to go.
 
The indicative votes have no legal authority (hence the name). However in theory Parliament could pass a bill requiring the chosen option to happen. If May didn’t support it she’d have to go.

I'm aware that the indicative votes are just that. But on the back of her "they've told us what they don't want, but not what they do want" speech, surely she could only get more blatant if she put her fingers in her ears and shouted "la la la la NOT LISTENING" as the results were read out.

She has to go, full stop. And without her version of Brexit, she's a PM leaving literally nothing as a legacy - even pig fucker could claim same sex marriage, May has absolutely nothing resembling an achievement. I'd almost feel sorry for her, if I didn't despise every fibre of her being.
 
I imagine that in practice the Speaker would give a lot of power to backbenchers and make things very difficult for May.

Agree with rest of your post :)
 
Let's say, for argument's sake, that one of the indicative votes gets a significant majority on Monday. Ken Clarke's amendment perhaps, or the put it to a referendum one, with a healthy 20 or 30 vote majority.

Theresa May says "no, stop getting it wrong and vote my deal through."

Who exactly is of sufficient authority to drag the deluded arsehole kicking and screaming out of the chamber?

Nobody, and therein lies the rub.
 
Back
Top Bottom