Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BrewDog: yet another hip company using 'rebel' language to sell its stuff

This seems a bit back to front to me to be honest. I don't think anyone is saying anyone else has an obligation to buy from Brewdog, that would obviously be ridiculous. If you don't want to just don't, nobody cares.
Yes, that's what I said.
Seems to me the implication on this thread is more the other way - that someone who would buy their products shouldn't.
I agree
And I think that absolutely does lead down that path of whataboutery tbh.
Absolutely, and if you are aware of other companies that are just as bad don't buy from them either. . . (though this thread is only about Brewdog).

But that wasn't their point. They were saying my equation of 'does your need/desire for a product outweigh how much you care about how much of a shitbag you think the company is?' was "not as simple as that". . . They set up a scenario where they wanted a non alcoholic beer. . . but only Brewdog or Becks, so which one should they have? They knew Brewdog was bad, but maybe Becks was also bad so why single out Brewdog for a boycott? I said because I know Brewdog are shits. If Becks are shit too then don't buy from them either . . . unless your need for beer outweighs how much you think they are cunts. . . that's up to the consumer. Seems quite simple to me. What isn't simple about that?
 
Yes, that's what I said.

I agree

Absolutely, and if you are aware of other companies that are just as bad don't buy from them either. . . (though this thread is only about Brewdog).

But that wasn't their point. They were saying my equation of 'does your need/desire for a product outweigh how much you care about how much of a shitbag you think the company is?' was "not as simple as that". . . They set up a scenario where they wanted a non alcoholic beer. . . but only Brewdog or Becks, so which one should they have? They knew Brewdog was bad, but maybe Becks was also bad so why single out Brewdog for a boycott? I said because I know Brewdog are shits. If Becks are shit too then don't buy from them either . . . unless your need for beer outweighs how much you think they are cunts. . . that's up to the consumer. Seems quite simple to me. What isn't simple about that?

You seem confused.
 
Charles Wells’s main brewery is just down the road from my house. I’ve never heard anyone working for them say they are cunts. But they do use agency staff sometimes.


They now also brew the Youngs range.

That is all.
Wikipedia says this "In May 2017, the company announced that it was selling the brewery and wine business to Marston's Brewery together with the Bombardier and McEwan's brands and rights to the Young's brands. It said it would set up a separate brewery in Bedford to brew Charles Wells-branded beers"
 
Wikipedia says this "In May 2017, the company announced that it was selling the brewery and wine business to Marston's Brewery together with the Bombardier and McEwan's brands and rights to the Young's brands. It said it would set up a separate brewery in Bedford to brew Charles Wells-branded beers"

I’m not sure that happened in full cos Covid. They flogged some of their brands and the new bottling plant and re branded as Wells and Co - though no one calls them that , arround the Brew Point brand?
 
I’m not sure that happened in full cos Covid. They flogged some of their brands and the new bottling plant and re branded as Wells and Co - though no one calls them that , arround the Brew Point brand?
i dont think they brew youngs from what i can see

they used to have distribution rights to Red Stripe in the uk ages ago, vaguely interesting point
 
The behaviour of Watt is appalling. There's no excuse for it. I shall be asking for "explanations" and, as an absolute minimum, apologies. There is no excuse for this behaviour. We all know better.
It's disappointing that you just forgot about it, when an apology was supposed to be an absolute minimum.

This is an illustration of why Brewdog and other companies can just not bother too much about a lot of this bad press stuff. Most people simply aren't that bothered in the end.
 
i dont think they brew youngs from what i can see

they used to have distribution rights to Red Stripe in the uk ages ago, vaguely interesting point
They lost the Red Stripe licence a few years ago ( to Northampton?) . They replaced it with Kirin but you can’t get it in many places now…
 
Has this article been posted? Some wild stuff. Don't take cocaine, guys.

I've read this properly now :mad: :(

Why anyone!, on this thread/Urban generally/elsewhere, might? be inclined to defend the main man being discussed, is utterly beyond me! :confused:
 
I haven't read it yet, but from a prior discussion:

cheaper clothing = sweatshops
Sweatshops (Libertarians say) are progress of the free market (the workers go there entirely voluntarily because it is better for them).
 
I don’t know. Buying shares in them is kind of defending them. or at least saying yeah, I’d like to profit from this companies activities.
Cue boring obvious post about pension funds.
For sure it's staying yes I'm happy to profit from the company's activities. And owning shares is about as far as anyone on this thread has gone in active involvement with the company. At least, as far as anyone has owned up to.

It's a bit silly to say it amounts to "defending" the activities and behaviour of James Watt though.

Various posters have defended their own choices. No-one that I remember has tried to defend James Watt.
 
I don’t know. Buying shares in them is kind of defending them. or at least saying yeah, I’d like to profit from this companies activities.
Cue boring obvious post about pension funds.

For sure it's staying yes I'm happy to profit from the company's activities. And owning shares is about as far as anyone on this thread has gone in active involvement with the company. At least, as far as anyone has owned up to.

It's a bit silly to say it amounts to "defending" the activities and behaviour of James Watt though.

Various posters have defended their own choices. No-one that I remember has tried to defend James Watt.
I have shares, it's mentioned on this thread. I was subjected to a lot of abuse for it. Anyone else who is a shareholder is unlikely to admit it here if they saw what abuse I received. They would be wise not to.
 
Back
Top Bottom