editor
hiraethified
It serves as a reminder of the true mindset of the people behind Brewdog. Useful to take into account when you're judging their latest advertising wheezes.Yes, it's horrible. Why?
It serves as a reminder of the true mindset of the people behind Brewdog. Useful to take into account when you're judging their latest advertising wheezes.Yes, it's horrible. Why?
Perhaps you missed the fact that they're holding the product in their hands. You know, advertising it.i dont think thats an advert is it?
It serves as a reminder of the true mindset of the people behind Brewdog. Useful to take into account when you're judging their latest advertising wheeze
We didn't yet get your explanation of why the billboard advert is body shaming, classist and sexist.The kids on "Knightmare" did less side-stepping than some on this thread.
It suggests with anyone with half a brain that they shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to sexism.Does that explain why that billboard is considered by some here to be sexist and body shaming? Because I can't think why else it would be.
I think is the most literal interpretation you have a valid point. That said, the advert appears as a pretty shoddy example of hypocritical virtue signalling.We didn't yet get your explanation of why the billboard advert is body shaming, classist and sexist.
So you DO have thoughts about the billboard!It suggests with anyone with half a brain that they shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to sexism.
Personally, I've no thoughts about the billboard. It's just more of the same shallow bullshit to be swallowed up whole by fanboys who don't mind the company's appalling record on their own workers, their casual sexism or laughing at sex workers.
time to move on, eh?You think people and companies should always be judged on their past, not their present?
I think it's a valid question. Can't people/institutions change?time to move on, eh?
Sounds familiar
Is this your way of saying that it's OK for grown men to employ sexism in their advertising just because it happened a few years ago. And they should never be held to account over it? Riiiight.So you DO have thoughts about the billboard!
You think people and companies should always be judged on their past, not their present?
Very much; they can get worse.I think it's a valid question. Can't people/institutions change?
LOL. Your attempts to make excuses for this awful company are becoming embarrassing now.I think it's a valid question. Can't people/institutions change?
Brewdog’s ascent from “punk” brewery to billion pound “punk” brewery has been marked by a series of risible publicity stunts and infantile advertising that has tipped into discrimination. It has frequently incorporated casual sexism, casual sexism based on “beer porn,” and one occasion implicit, if perhaps mistaken endorsement of Donald Trump into its version of whatever “punk” is supposed to be. Now, days before a revealing documentary, Brewdog appears to have stayed true to form.
No.Is this your way of saying that it's OK for grown men to employ sexism in their advertising just because it happened a few years ago. And they should never be held to account over it? Riiiight.
Can't you fucking read? I just said: "Personally, I've no thoughts about the billboard."No.
I'm not saying that. Please don't put words in my mouth. It's very annoying, and dishonest.
So .. how is the billboard sexist and body shaming?
I haven't made excuses for anyone.LOL. Your attempts to make excuses for this awful company are becoming embarrassing now.
Union and Former Staff Accuse Brewdog of Getting Ahead of Workplace Documentary by ‘Intimidating’ Workers
A union has described chief executive James Watt’s posts regarding an upcoming report on the "toxic workplace" at the company as "efforts by a multimillionaire to silence" workerslondon.eater.com
And then you gave your thoughts about it.Can't you fucking read? I just said: "Personally, I've no thoughts about the billboard."
Once again: I've no idea if the billboard is sexist and body shaming. I don't care. It's just more of their desperately shit attempts to be all edgelord and controversial and get people like you going on about it.And then you gave your thoughts about it.
Yes, I can read !
Yet again, I haven't made any excuses for them.Once again: I've no idea if the billboard is sexist and body shaming. I don't care. It's just more of their desperately shit attempts to be all edgelord and controversial and get people like you going on about it.
Given their appalling treatment on workers, why aren't you condemning the company out of hand instead of coming up with endless convoluted apologies and excuses for their conduct?
i think it was more of a press release tbhPerhaps you missed the fact that they're holding the product in their hands. You know, advertising it.
Virtue signalling is basically what advertising is.I think is the most literal interpretation you have a valid point. That said, the advert appears as a pretty shoddy example of hypocritical virtue signalling.
So in order to clarify matters your thoughts are...It suggests with anyone with half a brain that they shouldn't be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to sexism.
Personally, I've no thoughts about the billboard. It's just more of the same shallow bullshit to be swallowed up whole by fanboys who don't mind the company's appalling record on their own workers, their casual sexism or laughing at sex workers.
It's just more of the same shallow bullshit to be swallowed up whole by fanboys who don't mind the company's appalling record on their own workers, their casual sexism or laughing at sex workers.
I don't know; the more I 'engage my brain' and re-read the advert the more I'm coming round to the idea that by deliberately highlighting the very notion of advertising with body shaming, sexist and classist tropes to (hypocritically) virtue signal their own brand, they are attempting to benefit from body shaming, sexism and classism.Virtue signalling is basically what advertising is.
It wouldn't be unreasonable to argue this advert is hypocritical.
But this is a different charge to the ones in the original tweet though, which several people seem to have jumped on board with, without engaging any brain cells.
What's your thoughts on their sexism and their appalling treatment of workers?So in order to clarify matters your thoughts are...
They hired in half-naked sexy models, one with ripped stockings and the other looking in a bra like she's about to take off her jacket. The two holding the product are trying to take off the clothes of the besuited bosses of Brewdog. Are you OK with that kind of imagery being targeted at men?i think it was more of a press release tbh
I think you may have nailed it.I don't know; the more I 'engage my brain' and re-read the advert the more I'm coming round to the idea that by deliberately highlighting the very notion of advertising with body shaming, sexist and classist tropes to (hypocritically) virtue signal their own brand, they are attempting to benefit from body shaming, sexism and classism.
View attachment 322428
Would you reject the idea that they are attempting (hypocritically or otherwise) to benefit from associating themselves with a rejection of body shaming, classist and sexist tropes?I don't know; the more I 'engage my brain' and re-read the advert the more I'm coming round to the idea that by deliberately highlighting the very notion of advertising with body shaming, sexist and classist tropes to (hypocritically) virtue signal their own brand, they are attempting to benefit from body shaming, sexism and classism.
View attachment 322428
Any business wanting to associate themselves with a rejection of such tropes should be able to do in practice, by example without the need to make that explicit. There's a reason why BD can't do that.Would you reject the idea that they are attempting (hypocritically or otherwise) to benefit from associating themselves with a rejection of body shaming, classist and sexist tropes?