Have you ever actually tasted beer?This conversation is boring. Aren't there beer tasting clubs for this kind of thing.
You guys have clearly been tricked by multiple beer marketing departments into believing that there are significant differences between their products.
Quite probably there. There are clubs for most kinds of things.This conversation is boring. Aren't there beer tasting clubs for this kind of thing.
The first rule of beer tasting club is you talk and talk and talk about beer tasting club.
I think the answer to that one is that you need to become a cyclist?Ah, ok. Never been a huge fan of foamy head. Not in my beer anyway. It’s bubbles where beer should be.
The main trouble with ESB is that one pint can put you a bit too close to the drink driving limit and it’s hard to stop at one.
What "point" do you think was missed?Can you explain why the advert is "sexist, classist and body shaming"? Because it seems like someone's maybe missed the point a bit.
As far as I can see, the billboard is making fun of the kind of cliched beer advertising that such accusations could be levelled at.What "point" do you think was missed?
I can honestly say that AFAIK I've never drunk a beer that advertised like that.As far as I can see, the billboard is making fun of the kind of cliched beer advertising that such accusations could be levelled at.
It's tongue in cheek or just a witticism, I expect...I can't think of a beer I've ever seen advertised like that. Still, could've been worse: I expected the defence to be that all those -isms at once demonstrated admirable efficiency.
So can anyone explain to me what the twitter person meant by this, or not?Can you explain why the advert is "sexist, classist and body shaming"?
Yes. Do you really need an explanation or are you just trying to waste people's time?So can anyone explain to me what the twitter person meant by this, or not?
Yes, I need an explanation.Yes. Do you really need an explanation or are you just trying to waste people's time?
I was going to say this was tenuous nonsense, but I think it's pretty much straight up nonsense.OK, this is by no means comprehensive or the final say but just off the top of me head:
Sexist: assuming the male gaze, only men drink beer, women's role in relation to alcohol is for drunk men to have something to look at
Classist: assuming audience for ad is poor, and that the poor inevitably aspire to the naffest cliched trappings of the rich
Body shaming: knee-jerk association of size zero with desirability
Loads of advertising relies on sex/sexism. Not really a controversial point that it happens. That they are NOT doing that and having a jibe at it apparently makes them sexist.
The mind truly boggles.
I was going to say this was tenuous nonsense, but I think it's pretty much straight up nonsense.
It doesn't really seem worth it, but maybe tomorrow.And that releases you from any obligation to form an argument as to why it's nonsense? Convenient.
I'm searching their advertising history. Pink IPA seems inadvisable but doesn't contain scantily clad young women in the promos which is what they're having a jibe at.It bears repeating - yet again - that no-one's suggesting Brewdog is unique in this and that's why they're bad: it's the extent to which it's at odds with their wish to present themselves as full of punk attitude that riles people. A major facet of punk was the extent to which it aimed to be less obviously sexist than the music industry had hitherto been. (And yes, I know it failed at that again and again but nevertheless, women in the punk movement noted this fact too.)
I must be very unobservant because I’m really scratching my head here trying to recall beer being advertised in the recent past using images of “scantily clad young women”.