belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
In the way I said in 4938Am I? In what way?
In the way I said in 4938Am I? In what way?
She was sacked after two months.
In the way I said in 4938
Oh, your suppositions. Hardly proof that I'm wrong!In the way I said in 4938
Your claim that she was sacked for incompetent forecasting is wrong though, isn’t it? Because she’ll have been reporting on someone else’s forecast. In fact the very first person to mention incompetent forecasting was…. you! Making up an excuse on behalf of the boss.Oh, your suppositions. Hardly proof that I'm wrong!
Your claim that she was sacked for incompetent forecasting is wrong though, isn’t it? Because she’ll have been reporting on someone else’s forecast. In fact the very first person to mention incompetent forecasting was…. you! Making up an excuse on behalf of the boss.
Also, if it was just poor forecasting, why wait a week? And then do it the day after being informed of a serious family illness. Just a coincidence you think? You’re bloody naive if you do.
So it appears she was hired on a contract with a three month notice period (to be fair to Brewdog that's above the legal minimum) so when they terminated her contract (whether a fixed term or not) she is legally entitled to being paid her notice period (provided that Payment In Lieu Of Notice is in the contract). This payment is subject to income tax and nI deductions.Anyone fancy having a go at defending this bit? "She said the company “reluctantly” paid her threemonth notice period in March 2018 after she threatened legal action, leaving her without income for two months."
That doesn't matter though, we can just make it up!
As long as it's anti-BD it's unassailable, no matter how fabricated, and anything else is Daily Mail-esque
So it appears she was hired on a contract with a three month notice period (to be fair to Brewdog that's above the legal minimum) so when they terminated her contract (whether a fixed term or not) she is legally entitled to being paid her notice period (provided that Payment In Lieu Of Notice is in the contract). This payment is subject to income tax and nI deductions.
The fact that they tried to avoid paying it is in keeping with their shitty behaviour towards their employees.
In which case they wouldn't have paid her, would they. Honestly.Possibly. Or she could have been within a 3 month probationary period and they were under no obligation to pay it.
In which case they wouldn't have paid her, would they. Honestly.
She hired a lawyer to get the notice period money.Seriously? Have you honestly never known someone to be paid off if they caused enough nuisance?
It's perfectly possible. The article quoted doesn't give enough information either way.
She hired a lawyer to get the notice period money.
A lawyer would not have taken her case if it was without foundation.
Are you feeling alright, Spy?????This is a reasonable point.
Are you feeling alright, Spy?????
Oh well if that's what Brewdog say - you know, the company with a truly horrendous reputation for bullying, sexism and toxic workplace conditions - then it must be true!A spokesperson for BrewDog said:
"Ms Molyneux was on a fixed term contract which was bought to an end early, a decision taken by her line manger due to performance issues, totally independent of our CEO, as emails and other records show.
"At no point did he “scream” in this meeting – this allegation is utterly false as others in the meeting have confirmed. She was paid her full contractual entitlement on leaving.
You would do yourself more favours if you read more of this thread. This company cannot be trusted to tell the time of day.A spokesperson for BrewDog said:
"Ms Molyneux was on a fixed term contract which was bought to an end early, a decision taken by her line manger due to performance issues, totally independent of our CEO, as emails and other records show.
"At no point did he “scream” in this meeting – this allegation is utterly false as others in the meeting have confirmed. She was paid her full contractual entitlement on leaving.
Don't go dissing Status QuoVillage disco in 1977 was dominated by disco records, punk was a floor clearer, even less popular than rock (which meant Quo)
I am making no comment on the veracity or not of what they are saying. Merely reporting what was reported in the press.You would do yourself more favours if you read more of this thread. This company cannot be trusted to tell the time of day.
Merely Mon derriere.I am making no comment on the veracity or not of what they are saying. Merely reporting what was reported in the press.
Merely Mon derriere.
No, it's not punk enough for them.This is the name of BD's next IPA.
How about Mischief Brew? there's already a punk band. Cant be more punk than that surely?No, it's not punk enough for them.
"He DIDN'T scream did he? DID HE? I didn't hear him scream, so you didn't hear him scream, either.You would do yourself more favours if you read more of this thread. This company cannot be trusted to tell the time of day.
A mate worships quo and I didn't believe him when he told me that "Pictures of Matchstickmen" was by them . It just seemed so far from what I thought Quo did.Don't go dissing Status Quo
A much underated bandA mate worships quo and I didn't believe him when he told me that "Pictures of Matchstickmen" was by them . It just seemed so far from what I thought Quo did.