Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BrewDog: yet another hip company using 'rebel' language to sell its stuff

The big brewers that have numerous different lines in their portfolio will. They will shift a lot more.

In which case BD's success over such brands isn't isn't down to supermarket distribution.

You can't have it both ways. Either it's all about distribution, or there's something else in play.
 
Why would supermarkets stock a brand that they don't consider to be effectively marketed?
30-aldi-and-lidl-knock-off-brands.jpg

What do you think the marketing budget for Crownfield, Harvest Morn or Snackrite is?
 
Supermarkets don't reproduce any corporate branding next to the products they sell, do they? Unless it's a special promotion they just stick the products on the shelves
I've seen them do promotions of BD stuff, but not using BD imagery. I've seen other promotions that have used the brand's imagery. Maybe they don't regarding alcohol? Though I'm sure I've Carling (for example) promoted heavily in store using Carling brand identity.

It's not a key point anyway, was just a passing observation.
 
If the product is not well marketed, the supermarkets won't be so keen to have it on their shelves.

Supermarkets don't reproduce any corporate branding next to the products they sell, do they? Unless it's a special promotion they just stick the products on the shelves
Supermarkets are sometimes paid to take the product, and pay for the shelf placing.

A few years ago I worked with a European marketing director, and an international marketing manager, both of whom were in FMCG. They both placed products in Tesco, and other large European supermarkets. It was very interesting to hear how much time, effort, and money were spent getting products onto productive shelves.
 
Watt has a well rehearsed bit of patter that he was inspired by Sierra Nevada. He was just incapable of making it till Dickie learnt how whilst at thornbridge.
They both did a degree in brewing and distilling, so he should have been mostly capable.
 
Why is it that some people are so resistant to the notion that Brewdog's marketing strategy is highly effective?
Because they conflate the marketing with the other sides of the business. They don't understand that there's a difference. Whether you like the product, whether you like the perceived message, etc, the marketing is successful.

Unfortunately the zealots here cannot differentiate the appalling behaviour of Watt from the actual marketing, and often the product.

Watt comes across very badly as a person. Although he undoubtedly has input into the marketing the probability is that the marketing is done through a team. This team will make the decisions on the campaigns, branding etc. It's how these things work.
 
Because they conflate the marketing with the other sides of the business. They don't understand that there's a difference. Whether you like the product, whether you like the perceived message, etc, the marketing is successful.

Unfortunately the zealots here cannot differentiate the appalling behaviour of Watt from the actual marketing, and often the product.

Watt comes across very badly as a person. Although he undoubtedly has input into the marketing the probability is that the marketing is done through a team. This team will make the decisions on the campaigns, branding etc. It's how these things work.
You have yet to explain how the actions of the person are separate from the marketing, when both are misogynistic.

There's no way, the marketing team came up with a campaign that he didn't sign off on.

Have you had your apology from Brewdog yet?
 
Because they conflate the marketing with the other sides of the business. They don't understand that there's a difference. Whether you like the product, whether you like the perceived message, etc, the marketing is successful.

Unfortunately the zealots here cannot differentiate the appalling behaviour of Watt from the actual marketing, and often the product.

Watt comes across very badly as a person. Although he undoubtedly has input into the marketing the probability is that the marketing is done through a team. This team will make the decisions on the campaigns, branding etc. It's how these things work.
“Everything is marketing” - Watts mantra. His persona is the marketing and the marketing is his persona.

Yours is the kind of argument you’d get from some bloke who claimed he went to Hooters ‘for the food’
 
I think everyone knows that it is, and always has been.

It's just become the point that can't be conceded on this thread! :D
I don't think anyone denies that BD have generated huge profits for their owners (not the likes of you dessiato just the actual owners!) and that their marketing has contributed to that.

...but is making a profit really people's bottom line for determining whether something is 'good' or not?
 
I don't think anyone denies that BD have generated huge profits for their owners (not the likes of you dessiato just the actual owners!) and that their marketing has contributed to that.

...but is making a profit really people's bottom line for determining whether something is 'good' or not?
No. But it's a pretty good indicator of whether a company's marketing strategy has been successful!
 
Nobody denies that their marketing strategy was successful. Whether it will come back to bite them in the arse once it’s connection with bullying and misogyny is a different one.
 
Nobody denies that their marketing strategy was successful. Whether it will come back to bite them in the arse once it’s connection with bullying and misogyny is a different one.

I doubt it will in any significant way. JW might end up moving on to his next venture but even that's a long shot.

My guess is that BD will turn this into a marketing opportunity, "We've Learnt From Our Mistakes" style.
 
Back
Top Bottom