Who actually said this, though?
Nobody. But then what’s the purpose of the thread then?
Who actually said this, though?
He called posters on this thread:
Silly
Beefwitted serial offence takers
Bonkers
Brainless
Of your 101 posts on this thread, the large majority are defending the company and/or spymaster. You, not unlike James Watt, just don’t seem to consider women at all.It would be encouraging if changes happened in Brewdog from the shop floor than tut-tutting on the internet through an organised workforce. That doesn’t make me a misogynist ffs.
Nobody. But then what’s the purpose of the thread then?
Those on the Brewdog "shop floor" have been trying to better their lot, only to face the kind of prolonged doubt that you show in recent posts.It would be encouraging if changes happened in Brewdog from the shop floor than tut-tutting on the internet through an organised workforce. That doesn’t make me a misogynist ffs.
If you're so interested in these other companies go and start a thread on them instead of derailing this one.Not at all. But there’s other companies who are worse from that perspective if that’s the focus.
Of your 101 posts on this thread, the large majority are defending the company and/or spymaster. You, not unlike James Watt, just don’t seem to consider women at all.
If you're so interested in these other companies go and start a thread on them instead of derailing this one.
I don't care if you think we're 'doing politics wrong' or being a silly tut tutting woman, thanks.
Oh just go away you patronising fuckwit.Oh I dunno, maybe street prostitution could be a more pressing matter than a beer label?
Oh I dunno, maybe street prostitution could be a more pressing matter than a beer label?
Those on the Brewdog "shop floor" have been trying to better their lot, only to face the kind of prolonged doubt that you show in recent posts.
Then go and post in those threads if you really think that, and aren't just engaging in whataboutery.
Well there aren’t any. Because all focus is here.
Well nothing has been stopping you from starting one since like, ever. Yet you clearly haven't done so, despite how important you claim to think it is.
i.e. you're engaging in whataboutery.
All the ones where you defended them from the accusations of sexism for starters. Has your memory gone?Which of those posts did I defend the company?
Yes the worst thing happening to women is a beer label.
All the ones where you defended them from the accusations of sexism for starters. Has your memory gone?
Your words, not mine. You fucking have a word with yourself. You're literally using the exploitation of women to distract from the point. Dick.
You start a thread then.
maybe street prostitution could be a more pressing matter than a beer label?
Are you a yoga teacher, because that's a stretch.What prolonged doubt have I expressed towards trades unionism?
I'm not the the one criticising the existence of this thread. You were the one who said:
Are you a yoga teacher, because that's a stretch.
What’s wrong with that comment?
The context in which it's being used. It's a desperate attempt by you to say "but look over there!" when you know your "argument" (such as it is) is cobblers.
What’s cobblers about my argument?
You know. Well-founded arguments don't need to be buttressed with fallacies like "well, X thing is worse, why don't you care about that?"
Well it kind of does if someone thinks a beer label is the worst thing going on.
Except that nobody thinks that. That's a fantasy you're engaging in.
How far back do I need to look through your posts to find your other concerns?