chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
That's not really your motivation though is it?It came on the TV when I was on my break.
That's not really your motivation though is it?It came on the TV when I was on my break.
I expected a reasonable discussion ...
That's not really your motivation though is it?
I joined at the beginning of last year after lurking for a few weeks. Never been a member before that.Are you genuinely new or a returner?
I joined at the beginning of last year after lurking for a few weeks. Never been a member before that.
Well ordinarily, I post things here to generate discussion. As that what here is for. What’s your motivation for posting here?
On this thread, right now, to add my voice to those saying that the sexist shit deployed by Brewdog, and supported by some posters, isn't ok.
Good. I'm just not sure what benefit your intervention has. It reads - to me at least - as whataboutery, whether that was intended or not.Well you be pleased to learn I haven’t supported Brewdog either.
that's not how I remember it at all.No you didn't.
You , me, and others had "discussed" many times before, your fondness for sit-down pissing. It had become a board joke and ultimately we agreed to leave it because you were getting cross.
Then you posted that thread!
You couldn't possibly have expected it to go any other way unless you're a total moron.
Good. I'm just not sure what benefit your intervention has. It reads - to me at least - as whataboutery, whether that was intended or not.
It's contested whether it's a good thing within marginalised communities, for sure. I'm not totally into it myself, but it's not really my call.You got me. Although isn’t the jury still out on the whole reclaiming of words thing?
I'm unconvinced there's very many people who are actually confused by it tbh, just lots of dickheads who say they are cause they want a licence to say racist things etc.I’ve often been of the view that this whole ‘something is or isn’t sexist/racist/etc depending on who is saying it’ just further confuses the layman.
I'm unconvinced there's very many people who are actually confused by it tbh, just lots of dickheads who say they are cause they want a licence to say racist things etc.
Sort it out ffsI disagree. For example coloured people bad but people of colour good. It’s basically the same words in a different order.
I’ve often been of the view that this whole ‘something is or isn’t sexist/racist/etc depending on who is saying it’ just further confuses the layman. Plus there doesn’t appear to be a consensus on it. I’ll admit mischief by throwing it in the mix. But it shouldn’t be off bounds to discuss.
that's not what we're talking about here though? We're talking about marginalised communities reclaiming words that have been used as slurs against them. Can't see what relevance this has to that?I disagree. For example coloured people bad but people of colour good. It’s basically the same words in a different order.
There’s a lot of older people who use outdated terminology (coloured v poc v bame etc) with no malice intendedI'm unconvinced there's very many people who are actually confused by it tbh, just lots of dickheads who say they are cause they want a licence to say racist things etc.
that's not what we're talking about here though? We're talking about marginalised communities reclaiming words that have been used as slurs against them. Can't see what relevance this has to that?
There’s a lot of older people who use outdated terminology (coloured v poc v bame etc) with no malice intended
Sort it out ffs
e2a - YOU digress, who knows why, to take some heat off the "sound" poster maybe, but it's YOU digressing
What falls into acceptable language or not, in whose eyes etc. The continuation of some disallowed language by restructuring it.
...but to return to topic, what Brewdog have done here is the opposite of that.
They have knowingly taken what would be a generally inoffensive term in context (Growler as beer container) and linked that with it's offensive use as misogynist slur via their shitty "fnar fnar" branding campaign.
...but to return to topic, what Brewdog have done here is the opposite of that.
They have knowingly taken what would be a generally inoffensive term in context (Growler as beer container) and linked that with it's offensive use as misogynist slur via their shitty "fnar fnar" branding campaign.
These things are not always going to be easy to unpick, but I reckon if you listen to people and are prepared to back down when you fuck up you can usually find a way through without too much trouble. I think maybe if you feel something goes too far or is difficult to understand there's probably ways of opening up discussion into it that don't make you look like some twitter edgelord too.What falls into acceptable language or not, in whose eyes etc. The continuation of some disallowed language by restructuring it.
Is it? Personally, I find it utterly shite.I didn’t know that was a sexist term until this thread. I suppose the Northern version would be Slapper, although many women refer to each other as such. I don’t agree with sexism as a marketing device. Reclaimed words or not, you can’t deny that Loose Women are employing the same tactic. What makes it ‘acceptable’ on here is that the show is seen as empowering to women.
it isn't, he made that bit upIs it? Personally, I find it utterly shite.