Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BrewDog: yet another hip company using 'rebel' language to sell its stuff

I don't know why you're posting on this thread, you're not adding anything to the debate, just making a suggestion that people like me simply love the bullying and are doing it for attention.

Have a word with yourself.
It's how they get their jollies, here and vegan thread, sadly
Throwing in the odd reasonable looking post to make it look like they're not for a bit then back to trolling
 
Last edited:
Not all of the producers are women. Similarly not all of Brewdog’s executives are men.
Not sure what point or comparison you're trying to prove here.

The show was originally broadcast from Norwich, then Manchester, before moving to London, and focuses on a panel of four female presenters who interview celebrities, talk about aspects of their lives, and discuss topical issues ranging from politics and current affairs to celebrity gossip and entertainment news.


Executive producerEmma Gormley
ProducersEdd Benjamin Eleanor Cotter Mattie Jameson Helen Stuart Harriet Thurley Laura Hills (planning; head) Joey Cella (showbiz; head) Annabel Zammit (celebrity)
EditorsSally Shelford (Editor) Tom Sage (Deputy Editor) Yiljan Nevzat (Deputy Editor)
 
I am old enough to not much care about snide-y insinuating shite...but my 10 year old grand-daughter is enveloped in a fucking tidal wave of gendered, grotesquely skewed and impossible aspirations...and I swear, I am angry, sick of it and depressed, all at the same time. I don't relish getting shouty at posters on here - it's just not me...but I am sincerely asking for recognition that being joke-y, light-hearted, ironic doesn't somehow mitigate the really unpleasant, damaging effects of slippery nastiness...and tbh, I can't see anything commendable with producers using this sort of shitty marketing. Being slyly complicit with this sort of sniggery-pokery is...a bit rubbish.
 
Not sure what point or comparison you're trying to prove here.




Executive producerEmma Gormley
ProducersEdd Benjamin Eleanor Cotter Mattie Jameson Helen Stuart Harriet Thurley Laura Hills (planning; head) Joey Cella (showbiz; head) Annabel Zammit (celebrity)
EditorsSally Shelford (Editor) Tom Sage (Deputy Editor) Yiljan Nevzat (Deputy Editor)

So there’s an Edd a Mattie and a Joey credited as producers. So seems pretty mixed to me.
 
Why the fuck are you going on and on about an all-women hosted TV show when we're talking about misogyny in the brewing industry? What point are you trying to make?

On and on. Two posts.

I was pointing out another example of a sexist pejorative in branding. Which is what was being discussed earlier in the thread.
 
Yet again, it's not a cycling thread. It's a thread specifically (and admittedly) set up by Teuchter to create a ruck. There are plenty of other cycling thread that no "edgelords" go anywhere near, for you to have your jollies on. Personally I couldn't care less if the 'Car Prop' thread is binned.
Just to go back to this - what about the veggie threads and the other threads in which you and your fellow provocateurs like to misbehave on? it's not just that thread. you treat this place like a gladiatorial arena - it's all about the shit flinging - you and the others display very little interest in having a constructive conversation. You don't seem to realise that many of are earnest in their efforts to share their opinions and learn from discussing where they differ with others.
 
On and on. Two posts.

I was pointing out another example of a sexist pejorative in branding. Which is what was being discussed earlier in the thread.
I don't agree that an all woman TV show headed up by a female executive producer has sexist branding, not that it has anything to do with Brewdog.

Are you suggesting that the women are happy to go along with a 'sexist pejorative in branding' - or that they're too stupid to realise it?

Or perhaps they know exactly what's going on and are happy to have reclaimed the phrase on national TV?
 
Your point being what, Magnus McGinty ? I would not presume to speak on behalf of women or stuff like that...but I feel totally able to state how demeaning I find some language to be. It isn't even a clear or logical case either (and I can see why you are tempted by pointing out the inconsistencies implicit in various circumstances)...but it HAS been brought to your attention, that specifically, Brewdog, with their knowing, cynical sly disrespect and contempt, is particularly upsetting to these posters (including myself, although mostly from a solidarity POV)...so why not be a decent person and have some empathy?
 
I don't agree that an all woman TV show headed up by a female executive producer has sexist branding, not that it has anything to do with Brewdog.

Are you suggesting that the women are happy to go along with a 'sexist pejorative in branding' - or that they're too stupid to realise it?

Or perhaps they know exactly what's going on and are happy to have reclaimed the phrase on national TV?

Just strikes me as odd to be simultaneously against that sort of branding yet equally for it.
 
It's not really odd is it? The reclaiming of sexist / racist / homophobic etc slurs by the groups they're targeted at has such a long and widely known history that I can only imagine you're pretending not to understand what the difference is.

So where does that leave the female executives at Brewdog?
 
Just to go back to this - what about the veggie threads and the other threads in which you and your fellow provocateurs like to misbehave on? it's not just that thread. you treat this place like a gladiatorial arena - it's all about the shit flinging - you and the others display very little interest in having a constructive conversation. You don't seem to realise that many of are earnest in their efforts to share their opinions and learn from discussing where they differ with others.

I'm pretty sure it's only one veggie thread that's like that now and that too was set-up with a provocative, finger-wagging, title and OP. And when you say me and my fellow provocateurs, you seem to ignore the fact that most of the other contributors to that thread are fighting about it too! If threads are set-up like that, they're going to attract confrontation. There are other veggie threads that don't get touched by any "provocateurs". Cycling ones too.
 
So where does that leave the female executives at Brewdog?
Several people - reasonable, thoughtful posters - on this thread on a left wing messageboard which is apparently so left wing that we're totally removed from what normal people think, have said they don't get involved with discussions on feminism here because it's like banging their heads against a wall. Here, in one of the most ludicrously right-one spaces on the internet. Imagine what it must be like elsewhere. Imagine the adjustments & compromises many women must have to make to be able to get out of bed every the morning without stabbing you.
 
I'm pretty sure it's only one veggie thread that's like that now and that too was set-up with a provocative, finger-wagging, title and OP. And when you say me and my fellow provocateurs, you seem to ignore the fact that most of the other contributors to that thread are fighting about it too! If threads are set-up like that, they're going to attract confrontation. There are other veggie threads that don't get touched by any "provocateurs". Cycling ones too.
it doesn't matter that there are other threads that people behave themselves on - I'm talking about the ones in which people behave disgracefully and make posters not want to be here anymore.
It's all very well telling people to ignore certain threads and certain posters, but we'll still be aware that the rot is still there - it just has a veil across it. As I said earlier, some threads need to be gone cos they exist purely to whip up conflict
 
Back
Top Bottom