Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

BrewDog: yet another hip company using 'rebel' language to sell its stuff

Oh ok, I didn't realise complaints about misogyny had to be accompanied by an essay on why exactly I find it offensive.

I find it offensive because growlercan be used as a particular vulgar word for female genitalia and Brewdog have a history of using sexist and misogynistic language and imagery for gain, regardless of any offensiveness.

No-one has to ever explain why they find something offensive, here or in real life. You demanding an explanation just comes across as arrogant and that you know better than anyone else what is offensive and what isn't.

Whether or not you personally are familiar with the word 'growler' isn't the issue - it's been explained to you more than once that Brewdog are a shady company with no ethical compass and yet you see nothing wrong with their behaviour.
As someone who enjoys most of the beers, and as a shareholder it would be rather hypocritical if I did.

But to return to your point about the offensiveness of the word. If all you, or indeed anyone, states something is offensive it is usually a good idea to explain why. Had this been done I would have learned something and would have changed my position on this. Now I know that growler can be offensive, and why, I can modify my attitude to it. Without this knowledge why would I bother?
 
I had certainly never heard the term “rush the growler” before, but Googling it leads to a lot of hits and background on US drinking culture.
 
<tries to imagine the reaction if Brewdog had a beer called Bishops Finger…> :hmm:
They'd have faced legal action because that trademark brand was made in 1958 and describes the (Kentish) signposts that originally directed the pilgrims of Thomas a Becket travelling to Canterbury.

The signage is still shown on the bottle label:

1641766245562.png

Avery decent, good value strong beer.:thumbs:

The brewers are tory cunts, of course...like most brewers.
 
I had certainly never heard the term “rush the growler” before, but Googling it leads to a lot of hits and background on US drinking culture.
That article proves that Brewdog were perfectly aware of potential UK connotations back in 2011.

However, as discussed on this thread, a couple of weeks back an official report was published that confirms they have grown up and changed their ways now.

Each time someone criticises Brewdog for a past crime - while knowing they've now been officially proven to have improved themselves - it sends out a very negative message: don't ever work to improve your corporate culture because you'll just keep on getting put down for things you did in the past.

A very irresponsible message to send out to companies because it will just discourage any of them from doing things better.

For this reason the thread should be closed now. In fact it should be binned.
 
Back
Top Bottom