In what sense?
Concern.
In the sense that they are trolling with such deliberately divisive, bigoted views, there seems little need to speculate about matters apparently irrelevant to those. Personal view, and all that.
Still don't understand?
Did you really want to know if the poster was interested in fit young men?
Funny how things can "seem" if you take a very selective view of the issues...
TBF, I do think that our government is doing sterling work (rampant Covid-19, corruption, economic collapse, fucking Brexit) to make this country an unpleasant place to live. They're obviously playing the long game, and when they've thereby successfully stopped the tsunami of economic migrants coming here in their rubber boats for our bountiful benefits and free houses, we'll all be very grateful to them.
I assumed that the profile of the refugee mattered. Men typically fit the 'job stealing' or 'terrorist/criminal' demographic which a bigot might despise.
I think Pickman's model has a solution to this problem. One that is effectively described by the word "attrition"
I find it interesting that you know what £100m looks like when it's being used by the french govt to protect the border and you know for a fact that we aren't getting value for money. You must be an expert in these things, yes?
I see.
Looking back it was badly written
I took Badgers' post to be picking up on Bollox's bollox suggesting that all of the refugees were "fit young men". We know they're not, and we know why Bollocks wants to pretend that it's all about the (perceived) least-risk refugee group, but focusing on his apparent interest in the fitness and sex of these people is a good way to point up the idiocy of what he's claiming. Given that there's rarely any point having a sensible discussion with cunts like these: let's face it, the twat registered here with a username that hardly suggests he signed up in particularly good faith, he made a few efforts to try and blend in, and then - bosh - just as always, controversially-named New Member suddenly raises its skirts and reveals its cuntitude.
You made an obvious homophobic remark ffs.
Innit. The whole thing of leaving the EU was largely predicated (for many) on the idea that we wouldn't work with European partners on joint border control. That's exactly what's happening - France leaving it to the UK to police who can get into the UK. Yet those same people want/expect France to do it for us!
UK already has a bilateral arrangement with France, obviously it is a matter for the EU, but from what I can work out there must be some pressure to relook at Dublin agreement (and some pressure not to) Greece, Italy France will have a very different take on what to do about/with the people who turn up on their shores in a dinghy to say Finland for example. Might have something to do with sea temperature, who knows
Assuming I thought the remark was homophobic. Which I didn't.Lol.
If I’d have made similar homophobic remark we know too well you’d be hyperventilating with rage you disingenuous so and so
