no, a new system introduced in the future MAY HAVE a huge amount of implications, some of them pretty unsavoury. being as it is a hypothetical thing no one knows what it would be or what implications it might have.
Winners thou
still hurting
billbond can't spell whiner
thinking beautiful thoughts no doubt
people with marketing degrees are perhaps differently educated. certainly not better.
Were they working their way to your cycling proficiency class?
that doesn't follow at all
Union of the crowns was in 1603.
My mum's a Scottish history teacher. Don't tell her please.
the acts of union (scotland with england, 1706, england with scotland, 1707) which put into effect the treaty of union which maomao refers to but which everyone else has forgotten, these also made the queens - NOT the kings - of england and scotland queen of the united kingdom: queen anne being on the throne/s at the time.
Union of parliaments 1707, but James VI of Scotland also became James I of England in 1603 after the English Queen Elizabeth died.
Fair enough; we're still a kingdom 311 years later
tbf it was the tutorial level for Grand theft planet not that any of the regimes the evil empire conquered were proto workers states or anything they were just worse at the game of thrones
If the nationality of the monarch is what matters then we've been living variously in France, Holland and Germany all along.
Fuck. Although good too know the semi literate knob that wrote that sign was also presumably too scared of heights to go to the middle of the bridge to tie it on.
It's clearly a simile. It's a call that there must be no "Irish Nogay".
